Jump to content
IGNORED

all premier league to be shown until October


Never to the dark side

Recommended Posts

  • The title was changed to all premier league to be shown until crowds return
Just now, elhombrecito said:

No, but fans of Premier League teams will likely require a subscription to Sky Sports, BT Sport and Amazon to watch all their games in September.

Would wager a lot would have Sky Sports already, amazon can probably get around with a free trial by creating a new email so just BT sport who don't have many games per month as it is. Point being on top of a stupidly huge amount they all receive per month as a club through tv money their fans get the games made as accessible as possible to them often likely at no extra cost if they already have Sky sports/Amazon prime etc whereas non premier league fans have to pay £10 a game for less quality. Just shows how shite the last tv deal was negotiated, if it was fairer perhaps champ clubs wouldn't be desperate for the £10 a game and lower league clubs would also get bigger portions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Match Round 1

Saturday 12 September

12:30 Fulham vs. Arsenal (live on BT Sport)

15:00 Crystal Palace vs. Southampton (live on BT Sport)

17:30 Liverpool vs. Leeds United (live on Sky Sports)

20:00 West Ham United vs. Newcastle United (live on Sky Sports)

Sunday 13 September

14:00 West Bromwich Albion vs. Leicester City (live on Sky Sports)

16:30 Tottenham Hotspur vs. Everton (live on Sky Sports)

Monday 14 September

18:00 Sheffield United vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers (live on Sky Sports)

20:15 Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Chelsea (live on Sky Sports)

Match Round 2

Saturday 19 September

12:30 Everton vs. West Bromwich Albion (live on BT Sport)

15:00 Leeds United vs. Fulham (live on BT Sport)

17:30 Manchester United vs. Crystal Palace (live on Sky Sports)

20:00 Arsenal vs. West Ham United (live on Sky Sports)

Sunday 20 September

12:00 Southampton vs. Tottenham Hotspur (live on BT Sport)

14:00 Newcastle United vs. Brighton & Hove Albion (live on Sky Sports)

16:30 Chelsea vs. Liverpool (live on Sky Sports)

19:00 Leicester City vs. Burnley (live on BBC Sport)

Monday 21 September

18:00 Aston Villa vs. Sheffield United (live on Sky Sports)

20:15 Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Manchester City (live on Sky Sports)

Match Round 3* (confirmation of broadcast selections will follow imminently)

Saturday 26 September

12:30 Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Manchester United (live on BT Sport)

15:00 Burnley vs. Southampton (TBC)

15:00 Crystal Palace vs. Everton (TBC)

15:00 Tottenham Hotspur vs. Newcastle United (TBC)

15:00 West Ham United vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers (TBC)

17:30 West Bromwich Albion vs. Chelsea (live on Sky Sports)

Sunday 27 September

12:00 Sheffield United vs. Leeds United (live on BT Sport)

14:00 Fulham vs. Aston Villa (live on Sky Sports)

16:30 Manchester City vs. Leicester City (live on Sky Sports)

Monday 28 September

20:00 Liverpool vs. Arsenal (live on Sky Sports)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Possibly a change on the horizon?

I expect the Premier league sides are seeing the benefits of iFollow and see the opportunity to make a few quid....

TAKEN FROM: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54229967

Premier League clubs are considering ways of letting season ticket holders access matches not due to be broadcast live on television following the Government's decision to scrap the idea of letting fans back into stadiums at the beginning of next month.

Similar discussions took place before the Premier League decided to make all of September's fixtures available for broadcast by its partners in the UK.

It is understood substantive talks between the Premier League executive and the 20 clubs are yet to take place over how to proceed given Prime Minister Boris Johnson suggested it could be up to six months before fans were allowed into stadiums.

The Premier League believes it is capable of hosting matches in front of socially-distanced crowds now but realises it is not an argument they can win in the short term, even if their lobbying of Government will continue.

However, the clubs are wary about repeating last season's policy of letting every match be shown live on TV as it dilutes the product to rights holders.

There is also the continuing financial burden of having no fans in stadiums for an extended period.

The clubs feel making all matches available to season ticket holders is a way round this problem, although there is no guarantee the idea will be adopted.

Football League clubs are using the iFollow service to stream its matches that are not shown on Sky TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to all premier league to be shown until October
6 hours ago, phantom said:

Possibly a change on the horizon?

I expect the Premier league sides are seeing the benefits of iFollow and see the opportunity to make a few quid....

TAKEN FROM: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54229967

Premier League clubs are considering ways of letting season ticket holders access matches not due to be broadcast live on television following the Government's decision to scrap the idea of letting fans back into stadiums at the beginning of next month.

Similar discussions took place before the Premier League decided to make all of September's fixtures available for broadcast by its partners in the UK.

It is understood substantive talks between the Premier League executive and the 20 clubs are yet to take place over how to proceed given Prime Minister Boris Johnson suggested it could be up to six months before fans were allowed into stadiums.

The Premier League believes it is capable of hosting matches in front of socially-distanced crowds now but realises it is not an argument they can win in the short term, even if their lobbying of Government will continue.

However, the clubs are wary about repeating last season's policy of letting every match be shown live on TV as it dilutes the product to rights holders.

There is also the continuing financial burden of having no fans in stadiums for an extended period.

The clubs feel making all matches available to season ticket holders is a way round this problem, although there is no guarantee the idea will be adopted.

Football League clubs are using the iFollow service to stream its matches that are not shown on Sky TV.

The next logical step for the PL has, for a long time, been the creation of it's own streaming service. Centrally hosted with all matches streamed live across the weekend it could be an enormous revenue spinner whilst allowing the PL to retain complete control of its product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

The next logical step for the PL has, for a long time, been the creation of it's own streaming service. Centrally hosted with all matches streamed live across the weekend it could be an enormous revenue spinner whilst allowing the PL to retain complete control of its product.

Was it you who posted this before?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Never to the dark side said:

On the assumption that this also applies to tomorrow's 7:45pm cup ties, even without extra time is it not cutting it fine if showing one of the fixtures in a pub?  What happens if both halves have significant injury time then an elongated penalty shoot out afterwards, its not beyond possibility that it could run well after 10pm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ronnie Sinclair said:

On the assumption that this also applies to tomorrow's 7:45pm cup ties, even without extra time is it not cutting it fine if showing one of the fixtures in a pub?  What happens if both halves have significant injury time then an elongated penalty shoot out afterwards, its not beyond possibility that it could run well after 10pm?

My guess a couple of games will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ExiledAjax said:

Yeh probably. They make a compelling argument if you're a PL exec searching for some £££. They are doing fag packet maths without full knowledge of the finances involved, but it is compelling.

If you kept the same % paid into lower league football could really help lower league clubs as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 hour ago, Ronnie Sinclair said:

On the assumption that this also applies to tomorrow's 7:45pm cup ties, even without extra time is it not cutting it fine if showing one of the fixtures in a pub?  What happens if both halves have significant injury time then an elongated penalty shoot out afterwards, its not beyond possibility that it could run well after 10pm?

Wouldn't think so, but only on the basis that Sky are using 8pm kick offs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, phantom said:

The start of English TV contracts going like they do in Spain 

Would that fit with Competition laws then? I recall a while ago Sky's monopoly was called into question.

Interesting you should mention Spain, they have a much more centralised approach than 10 years ago- still not as equal as ours but more than it was! Sure it's helped the competitive balance there- 10 years ago there were enormous gaps in La Liga between the big 2 and the rest- not that Spain didn't have other good sides but so much cash went to the big 2 that it was a bit of a monopoly if anything- the Barcelona and Real Madrid squads 10 years ago were ridiculous however- albeit the first more organic, had more from academy etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, The Wild Bunch said:

I have NFL Gamepass which allows me to stream every live game.  You can also watch games from previous seasons at a press of a button.  One way the Premier League could go with the next TV contract.

Got to agree GamePass is worth every penny. My team are West Coast so home games end after midnight. Too late for work. I can eatch the entire game next day without adverts. Love it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

How would Premflix or whatever we want to call it, fit with UK competition laws?

Been a decade or so since I studied competition law in the UK (or EU competition law as it was then). Essentially I would imagine that as the Prem would be selling it's own product there would likely be an exemption or way around it. Similar to how Bristol City doesn't need to worry about competition law when streaming Bristol City games. Competition law is generally only concerned with multiple entities providing the same service and how their relationships (be it co-operative or antagonistic) work to fix or influence a market to the detriment of the consumer.

In the case of "Premflix" you'd have a single product, being "manufactured" and sold by a single entity. I'm really not sure competition law would apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...