Jump to content
IGNORED

The Formula One Thread


Tipps69

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Maltshoveller said:

As you just said The best person in those events win but none are relying on having the best equipment to help them win

I get you hate Hamilton and it’s cool, but that’s not what this discussion about whether you think he doesn’t deserve to win or Max did, it’s the way the race ended that’s the controversy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The uproar about this shows how unusual it is, there were lots of other incidents, eg Verstappen overtake and Hamilton retaining 1st (driven off by MV or gaining an advantage?), the virtual safety car after some terrible parking by Giovinazzi allowing MV a cheap pitstop, Perez being a far better wingman than Bottas. All of which fans accept as tough racing or good/bad luck, whereas how it ended was WWE writ large. 

One thing that’s increasingly clear is the disadvantages of being first when lots of safety cars. Whoever’s in 2nd gets to decide what to do, wonder if they’ll look at stopping tyre changes under a yellow flag. 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JamesBCFC said:

not even him, more been trolls on twitter, but anyone who trolls is a worthless *** regardless of where they do it

 

add in that the moderators here do **** all about trolling, but i got a week ban for calling robbored one.

 

this place is falling to shit and scum like Super are why

You should probably calm down a bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Super said:

I think it's the greatest lap of driving ever.

I thought Lewis Hamilton’s driving was far superior , he was doing a second a lap on max the whole time but still lost the race ?! It’s like being 2-0 up in football and then told to start at 0-0 at 90 mins , don’t really understand it 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LoyalRed said:

I thought Lewis Hamilton’s driving was far superior , he was doing a second a lap on max the whole time but still lost the race ?! It’s like being 2-0 up in football and then told to start at 0-0 at 90 mins , don’t really understand it 

Yep, if F1 - and it appears they have - can convince themselves that the end of that race is what should be expected, with a crash 5 or so laps from the end, then think they’ll have a serious credibility issue. Hamilton was on the same tyres (a few laps older due to Verstappen getting a cheap pitstop during the virtual safety car) as MV, with an 11/12 second lead before the safety car. At the end of the safety car, due to no great/terrible driving or dubious tactics by either, MV was on new soft tyres and right behind LH, but with no sign of Sainz being allowed to be in MV’s rear view mirrors, due to Masi picking and choosing who he let through. A massive net loss for LH that had nothing to do with the performance of him or MV and well beyond luck/racing incident/“let them race”. 

Think Mercedes need to push the appeal to the limit to try and sort things out for next season if nothing else, as based on today, no one can have a clue what rules will be applied when in future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
27 minutes ago, The Swan and Cemetery said:

Yep, if F1 - and it appears they have - can convince themselves that the end of that race is what should be expected, with a crash 5 or so laps from the end, then think they’ll have a serious credibility issue. Hamilton was on the same tyres (a few laps older due to Verstappen getting a cheap pitstop during the virtual safety car) as MV, with an 11/12 second lead before the safety car. At the end of the safety car, due to no great/terrible driving or dubious tactics by either, MV was on new soft tyres and right behind LH, but with no sign of Sainz being allowed to be in MV’s rear view mirrors, due to Masi picking and choosing who he let through. A massive net loss for LH that had nothing to do with the performance of him or MV and well beyond luck/racing incident/“let them race”. 

Think Mercedes need to push the appeal to the limit to try and sort things out for next season if nothing else, as based on today, no one can have a clue what rules will be applied when in future. 

Safety cars are part and parcel, it appears this one was cocked up, but it realistically affected the placings lower down the order.  Silverstone 2 years ago…..

 

FE02D558-FE8A-4887-9428-AC075984A627.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JamesBCFC said:

****  off you pathetic ***

how ******* shit is your life that you troll on a forum?

If Max had got ahead during the race, then I'd have no issue. It's the fact Masi broke FIA regs to manufacture the end of the race which gifted the win.

It isnt even a Hamilton thing, I'd be angry with this regardless of who the drivers are. Like Robbo I support McLaren and Norris.

 

You still havent answered why you keep lying about Hamilton though.

(you're completely right tbf)

Edited by ZiderEyed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to the radio is so dodgy, Horner telling the stewards ‘we only need one more racing lap’, and then the stewards just engineer that situation for him, that has never happened before and looks about as contrived a situation as you can possibly imagine. 

This is going to the FIA and then CAS and to be quite honest I think Mercedes have a case. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JamesBCFC said:

****  off you pathetic ***

how ******* shit is your life that you troll on a forum?

If Max had got ahead during the race, then I'd have no issue. It's the fact Masi broke FIA regs to manufacture the end of the race which gifted the win.

It isnt even a Hamilton thing, I'd be angry with this regardless of who the drivers are. Like Robbo I support McLaren and Norris.

 

You still havent answered why you keep lying about Hamilton though.

You do seem angry. Did you lose money?!

Edited by Super
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
9 hours ago, TomF said:

We could also talk about the farce of Spa this year and safety cars 

I think the FIA and the teams need to get to gather over the winter and thrash out a set of rules so that a situation like this never happens again.  Maybe if there is a accident that requires car recovery within the last - say 8 laps- it should be an immediate red flag and restart.  Either that or the gap between the cars before the safety car came out has to be maintained, shouldn’t be impossible given the technology available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Maesknoll Red said:

I think the FIA and the teams need to get to gather over the winter and thrash out a set of rules so that a situation like this never happens again.  Maybe if there is a accident that requires car recovery within the last - say 8 laps- it should be an immediate red flag and restart.  Either that or the gap between the cars before the safety car came out has to be maintained, shouldn’t be impossible given the technology available.

Protocols around the safety car need a big rethink. It hands a massive and unfair advantage to chasing cars, who in many cases would not be anywhere near the lead car. As with yesterday, Max was a fair distance behind, and had Latifi not crashed Hamilton would have cruised it. The crash, safety car, tyre change and then all that nonsense from Masi at the end handed it to Verstappen. Not his driving skill. He just got lucky and if you are Mercedes who spend many millions on the sport, you would be within your rights to say sod this. That isn't sport.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair I don't mind the idea of SC's, it does create a bit more randomness which generates excitement, even if it isn't 100% fair. The problem is that in this case the rules have allowed the race director to create the exact situation that he wants. That shouldn't be possible and the rules need tightening up for sure.

I think the verdict from Masi asks the question that Merc will be asking in court. He says in allowing the lapped cars to overtake the SC, he interpreted that as 'removing the cars that would intervene with the leaders of the race'. So why did he interpret 'leaders of the race' as simply the cars between Lewis and Max? Surely Sainz, in third and a podium spot, should also count here? Why were the cars removed for Max but not Sainz? It literally created the perfect scenario where Max had no one blocking him in front and cars blocking the third place driver behind. There is no precedent for a) releasing just the right number of cars for a particular driver and b) bringing the SC in immediately as a consequence. Not doing either of those would certainly have given Lewis the Championship, it's an absolute farce.

Again, completely manufactured and artificial, and it happened either through incompetence or corruption. If F1 fail to acknowledge it as the former then it's going to look like it was the latter.

Edited by nebristolred
  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nebristolred said:

Again, completely manufactured and artificial, and it happened either through incompetence or corruption. If F1 fail to acknowledge it as the former then it's going to look like it was the latter.

You are 100% correct. I hope the FIA have deep pockets, because Mercedes will sue. I know they won the constructors, but how many people including LH will have been on a bonus linked to the drivers championship? It really is one of the biggest steals in sport ive ever seen tbh

Edited by TonyTonyTony
LH not LJ !
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Super said:

You do seem angry. Did you lose money?!

You raise an interesting point, i assume millions have been bet on the outcome of this race and of the championship. With the result being manipulated and manufactured in the way it has i wonder if there’s going to be any comeback from the betting companies or whether they’ll try and void it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, East Londoner said:

You raise an interesting point, i assume millions have been bet on the outcome of this race and of the championship. With the result being manipulated and manufactured in the way it has i wonder if there’s going to be any comeback from the betting companies or whether they’ll try and void it 

Paddy Power did one of their "Justice payouts" for people who did single bets on Max and Lewis to win the race and also to become World Champion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Maltshoveller said:

As you just said The best person in those events win but none are relying on having the best equipment to help them win

Mercedes have the best and fastest car but I guess their argument is they have the best car but there's still regulations which limit what they can/ can't do to try and make it competitive. 

In the same way that Man City have the best training facilities, best stadium, most money to splash on players etc but their argument will be they do it within the FFP regulations. 

In every sport teams or individuals will have an advantage that's relatable to Hamilton & Mercedes having the fastest car. That's why we love random events.

It was yesterday's random event that made the last lap so exciting to watch, not that I necessarily agree with the actions taken by Masi/ FIA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What will be interesting over the coming days is the fact that publicly - we've only heard from Red Bull about all this, as they were the only ones willing to talk to the press after.

Mercedes were silent. We haven't heard from the other teams. They and their sponsors add up to a lot more than Red Bull and Honda. We were talking billions in sponsorship and many of those sponsors will be concerned, to put it politely. 

I suspect the FIA will today be under immense pressure from everyone except Red Bull/Honda about the absolute farce of yesterday.

Money talks and integrity, at least on the face of it, is important too. We'll see, but big sponsors or manufacturers pulling out, which is possible, is not a good look for the F1 - so they're facing a political, financial and legal fight right now. Masi and the stewards may make choices on the day, but more powerful people call the shots behind the scenes so I don't think this is going away anytime soon. 

Edited by Alessandro
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TonyTonyTony said:

Interesting article here on taking it to the court

Unfortunately whoever ‘wins’ the title it’s now tainted as it was either won using rules made up on the spot or in the courtroom. I think Lewis has already realised that 

Suddenly the last race finishing under the safety car doesn’t seem so bad after all. As this is the last thing the sport needed and was entirely avoidable 

Red Bull would’ve been screaming from the rooftops had roles been reversed and Horner as usual has shown a healthy amount of hypocrisy 

The worry now is the damage it’s done to the sport as a whole, as we now have two camps the core support who want sporting integrity and the newer support who want entertainment 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TomF said:

Like you say its not Max/Red Bulls fault as such although would Masi have let them race if Horner wasn't in his ear constantly? 

Lewis may well have retired if he won yesterday

Have to admit he has taken it very well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...