Jump to content
IGNORED

Bournemouth sack Tindall


harvey54

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

At least he’ll have time to top up his tan now. He was looking far too pale for my liking

EEAD91CE-3571-4F17-BC31-ADB9EA3A81B8.jpeg

Bournemouth closer to the equator than Bristol, so I would imagine a decent tan without the need to relocate is certainly achievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

And he’s not the only one. At the risk of this turning into a Holden out thread, the commonality between him and Tindall is not one other club at our level or the level below would have appointed them. In the summer, DH was in the betting for one other job - Southend.

Poor decision from both clubs considering other candidates

@Silvio Dante

I won't rule out City making a change at the end of the season with regards to the Head coach. Your views?

It's a 12 month rolling contract, and MA wouldn't be drawn on extending it.

With so many players OOC; it would be a good time for a new coach to come in, and reshape the team for the 21-22 season.

Interesting to see that PS & KD, both signed 3 year contracts though. They're not stupid when it comes to knowing that they'll be gone in 12 months; and will want a decent payout.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncnsbcfc said:

@Silvio Dante

I won't rule out City making a change at the end of the season with regards to the Head coach. Your views?

It's a 12 month rolling contract, and MA wouldn't be drawn on extending it.

With so many players OOC; it would be a good time for a new coach to come in, and reshape the team for the 21-22 season.

 

That’s the annoying thing tho, why wait until then - a new manager would get a free hit for a little while. 

I feel bad suggesting that we replace Holden, but someone else would do a better job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fordy62 said:

That’s the annoying thing tho, why wait until then - a new manager would get a free hit for a little while. 

I feel bad suggesting that we replace Holden, but someone else would do a better job. 

@Fordy62

I know what you mean, I want to get behind DH, but the football at the moment is pitiful; and as others have said it's lucky the team don't have live fans to get on their backs as well.

The 21-22 season is absolutely key for the next 3 years, as its an opportunity to completely refocus the playing staff.

If we have the wrong person in charge, then it won't be long before we're back in L1 again unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ncnsbcfc said:

@Silvio Dante

I won't rule out City making a change at the end of the season with regards to the Head coach. Your views?

It's a 12 month rolling contract, and MA wouldn't be drawn on extending it.

With so many players OOC; it would be a good time for a new coach to come in, and reshape the team for the 21-22 season.

Interesting to see that PS & KD, both signed 3 year contracts though. They're not stupid when it comes to knowing that they'll be gone in 12 months; and will want a decent payout.

 

Well I did say this wouldn’t be a Holden out thread but as you asked...!

I think you’re probably right in your reading. SL/MA don’t pull the trigger quickly in normal circumstances, and they won’t while the playoffs are attainable (which was minimum target). It’s a technicality for me that they’re attainable as they are mathematically but I would challenge anyone to say that they expect us to do it based on how we’re playing.

Add in here the Covid factor - we don’t know when fans are back, to what extent and how many will be able to financially. I do think it would be quite toxic if fans were there so DH is benefitting, but I also have sympathy for the theory that games seem more boring with no atmosphere!

Summary: Yeah, end of season I think he’s gone barring a miracle. The injury excuses are gone, he’s been backed in the market and he’s had a year to stamp an identity in the team - while theoretically knowing what needed to improve. If we’re not in the playoffs or very close to and still playing in the same style, I don’t see a way back. 
 

The kicker will be season ticket sales. The club will anticipate a reduction due to Covid finances/concerns, but it’s how far below that bar they fall. I’ll be renewing regardless, but I would think many won’t and that will be the feedback they act on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

Well I did say this wouldn’t be a Holden out thread but as you asked...!

I think you’re probably right in your reading. SL/MA don’t pull the trigger quickly in normal circumstances, and they won’t while the playoffs are attainable (which was minimum target). It’s a technicality for me that they’re attainable as they are mathematically but I would challenge anyone to say that they expect us to do it based on how we’re playing.

Add in here the Covid factor - we don’t know when fans are back, to what extent and how many will be able to financially. I do think it would be quite toxic if fans were there so DH is benefitting, but I also have sympathy for the theory that games seem more boring with no atmosphere!

Summary: Yeah, end of season I think he’s gone barring a miracle. The injury excuses are gone, he’s been backed in the market and he’s had a year to stamp an identity in the team - while theoretically knowing what needed to improve. If we’re not in the playoffs or very close to and still playing in the same style, I don’t see a way back. 
 

The kicker will be season ticket sales. The club will anticipate a reduction due to Covid finances/concerns, but it’s how far below that bar they fall. I’ll be renewing regardless, but I would think many won’t and that will be the feedback they act on

I don't see any point DH leaving now as you say.

We are, where we are this season. The championship is generally very poor, and potentially yet again it's a missed opportunity to get into the playoffs.

I'm sure however that there are a lot of clubs that feel the same.

The bizarre things about the whole appointment was the two England coaches coming in to support him. Collectively their wages, must be on a par; if not larger than DHs. It's also a bit of an acknowledgement that the new coach is inexperienced, and needs help.

Just like in normal life, no-one knows what's going to happen after all the government support for businesses end. I'm just lucky that i'm in the same business as @Fordy62; and my wife's a Uni lecturer. So both public sector thankfully.

With regards to the salary cap. They still haven't explained what's going to happen with the clubs coming down from the PL. If existing contracts from their time in the PL are excluded; then the disparity in squad wages will be even more acute.

I'm guessing that, on that basis; MA will struggle to sell the concept to a number of clubs. Who will feel that arguably the most unequal financially competition in world football will become even worse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stakes are much higher in Bournemouth's case. They've kept many of their players for the moment, but how many of them are going to hang around for another season of Championship football if they don't go up this year, especially if the external environment improves and the summer transfer window is more normal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Red Army 75 said:

Paul Cook IMO could do a decent job at Bournemouth 

Paul Cook could do a decent job at a lot of clubs, but his image might not be right for Bournemouth.  I imagine they'll go for someone a bit more exotic. He course, of course, change his name to Paulo Cookazoo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Silvio Dante said:

And he’s not the only one. At the risk of this turning into a Holden out thread, the commonality between him and Tindall is not one other club at our level or the level below would have appointed them. In the summer, DH was in the betting for one other job - Southend.

Poor decision from both clubs considering other candidates

Commonality. Good word. Had to google it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, pongo88 said:

Paul Cook could do a decent job at a lot of clubs, but his image might not be right for Bournemouth.  I imagine they'll go for someone a bit more exotic. He course, of course, change his name to Paulo Cookazoo

I don't think Bournemouth has ever had a foreign manager before, aside from Sean O'Driscoll? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Major Isewater said:

Fair play to Bournemouth for giving a chance to the number two from a failed season and equally acting quickly to try to resolve the problem of a stuttering campaign.

Will it work ? 
 

No one can tell but it is a brave move and sends out a statement of intent from the club.

 

Or just another basket case of a club destined for the lower leagues? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Phileas Fogg said:

Not glamorous enough for them. I wonder whether he wasn’t ‘glamorous’ enough for us.. in that he wanted to do things his own way. Think he’d have been an excellent choice for us.

Can 100% see that.

True. Do you think we should apply the same logic if/when Playoffs look unlikely?

Why would they want a glamorous manager? What the **** is glamorous about Bournemouth? The town is bang average and its other part Boscombe is a dump. 

The ground is pretty ordinary, like the park it sits in. The club found some new money and had a little success but they have no given right for that to continue. Eddie Howe,  their most successful manager in recent history, could hardly be described as glamorous either. 

If they have any sense a manager like Cook is exactly who they should appoint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ncnsbcfc said:

It's a 12 month rolling contract, and MA wouldn't be drawn on extending it.

A 12 month rolling contract means that   there is always twelve months of work ahead .

The advantage for the club is that in the event of a rupture there would only be twelve months compensation due ( as I understand it ) .

For the coach , he has perpetually a year’s job security.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Major Isewater said:

A 12 month rolling contract means that   there is always twelve months of work ahead .

The advantage for the club is that in the event of a rupture there would only be twelve months compensation due ( as I understand it ) .

For the coach , he has perpetually a year’s job security.

 

No it doesn’t 

I think it was @Davefevs that posted an explanation from a specialist lawyer on here re rolling contracts

He explains that there will be a set date , by which both parties have to state their intentions (To renew or not) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember rightly Bournemouth are on the hook for £80m in unpaid transfers fees as they splayed the cash in the 19/20 season to stay up, it failed and the equal instalments mean the parachute money is completely taken up whilst they did (last year) have a £109m Wage Bill.

Ergo; if they don’t go up this year they are royally ******.

 I see you’ve still got your No.2 in charge, it’s all very much the same, as you all know my best mate is a City fan and for years we’ve both been saying decent manager = decent chance.

There is really no point spending money on players if you have a poor manager, those players by themselves will not be enough to get you up so it doesn’t make sense.

When you think that as a club you’ve sold more than you’ve bought (probably because Lansdown can’t be arsed to continue funding the football side of sport Bristol) it makes no sense you’d be happy to spend £8m on a Kalas or £7m on a Massengo and have no one decent to coach them?

It confuses me, he made his money in investment, so why can’t he see the BIGGEST investment should be in the manager, no point having fast cars if you’ve got no one who knows how to drive them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
8 minutes ago, Sheltons Army said:

No it doesn’t 

I think it was @Davefevs that posted an explanation from a specialist lawyer on here re rolling contracts

He explains that there will be a set date , by which both parties have to state their intentions (To renew or not) 

I stand to be corrected but I always believed a rolling 12 month contract basically meant it was an open ended contract, but if the Manager is to be let go they have a 12 month period to be paid off.

The whole point of it being "rolling" is that there are no fixed dates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...