Jump to content
IGNORED

48%


Bs4Red

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Kibs said:

It’s a vicious circle. They are playing so badly that they don’t want the ball. They don’t move and they hide making every pass more and more difficult.

When they do get it, they can’t get rid of it quickly enough!!! If there’s no immediate option, you don’t see any composure, it’s just shear panic, get rid and smash it up pitch. 

We are not a team in any sense of the word. It’s like watching 11 strangers. No partnerships anywhere on the pitch, the defensive, midfield and attacking units don’t work together either. 

Ive honestly never seen anything like it whilst watching City.

City have been low possession and not high accuracy for a significant period = I wouldn't expect to see composure. 

City looked to play forward quickly and long. There was an onus on not keeping the ball. There is a vicious circle because the base of possession they work from is not secure. Too much change creates uncertainty. Passing patterns cannot be internalised, this includes movement. Add Barnsley pushing right up squeezing the space and poor decision (stress) making follows. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Monkeh said:

It's like they aren't training together at all

Back in the 80's (1880's) I've played in better Sunday football sides...

And that's after working all week,,,no chance to train,,,playing a decent standard of football on a Saturday afternoon,,,getting pissed up/kebab'd up,,,then kick off at 10.30 next morning...

Maybe our lot shouldn't train together at all & get steaming as a group of blokes the night before every game...

We wouldn't be any worse for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cowshed said:

City have been low possession and not high accuracy for a significant period = I wouldn't expect to see composure. 

City looked to play forward quickly and long. There was an onus on not keeping the ball. There is a vicious circle because the base of possession they work from is not secure. Too much change creates uncertainty. Passing patterns cannot be internalised, this includes movement. Add Barnsley pushing right up squeezing the space and poor decision (stress) making follows. 

 

Which is fine if there is then an emphasis on winning the drop downs, winning the ball back quickly, high up the pitch and forcing the opposition into mistakes.....

 But that doesn’t seem to be part of the “plan”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Kibs said:

It’s a vicious circle. They are playing so badly that they don’t want the ball. They don’t move and they hide making every pass more and more difficult.

When they do get it, they can’t get rid of it quickly enough!!! If there’s no immediate option, you don’t see any composure, it’s just shear panic, get rid and smash it up pitch. 

We are not a team in any sense of the word. It’s like watching 11 strangers. No partnerships anywhere on the pitch, the defensive, midfield and attacking units don’t work together either. 

Ive honestly never seen anything like it whilst watching City.

Good analysis, totally agree with you.  The only one who showed a bit of composure and didn’t try to get rid immediately was Palmer who was too composed and consistently lost the ball and Bakinson when he came on who tried to find teammates but they were hiding.  Bristol Post published this stat and those of individual players - Jack Hunt came out worst but that doesn’t tell the whole story  even though he was terrible because whenever he got it he had no options.  Was the masterpiece of these world class coaches to play route one Sunday league football because that’s what it looked like to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Silvio Dante said:

Lansburys percentage in isolation may be even lower than that.

Every time he had the ball he smacked it first time, aimlessly and out of play. It was commentated on as “looking for the early through ball”, whereas in reality it was a welt.

Still, nice hipster beard.

Depends how much was him and how much tactics.

Against Reading we were as direct as I've seen, Yesterday we did it from Bentley.
How many times have people said that Fam isn't a real target man? Yet we still try. A team that struggle with  possession, so we go long. 50/50 chance of winning the first ball, that probably goes down for 2nd ball. We have managed to make sides that don't play possession football, look like Man City. That is over the last 2 years, it's not a recent thing. I remember defending Lee Tomlin as he was the only one looking for the ball, we've somehow managed to take that problem to a whole new level. 

If we don't have the ball, we are defending. We get the ball , punt it, it doesn't stick and so we lose possession, vicious circle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...