Jump to content
IGNORED

Lansbury


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Kid in the Riot said:

So you say yourself he wasn't signed for his ability, he wasn't signed for PR, so why the hell was he signed?

Shits and giggles and a brown envelope? 

He was signed because they were desperate - and coudnt get any one else to join Deans Circus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Roger Red Hat said:

I think DH got Lansbury from his mate Dean Smith at Villa.

Nice mate..

55 minutes ago, Moments of Pleasure said:

The lads call him "Angela," says it all, really 

Bit harsh, Angela at 95 has a bit more pace than our Henri

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, formerly known as ivan said:

Why oh why??? What a waste of a wage. Looks so clear off the pace of games it’s unreal. Almost like someone walked over to the park, found a drunk asleep on a bench and gave him a kit.

Good player a few years ago but way too much time spent out of first team action.

Hopefully we won’t see him many more times in a city shirt.

Pretty sure Pearson made the sub (could be wrong)... unless someone saw Ashton or Jon Lansdown down there? 

Pearson chose to bring him on and not HNM so why are we bashing Lansbury?

The new scapegoat for uneducated BristolCity fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, formerly known as ivan said:

Why oh why??? What a waste of a wage. Looks so clear off the pace of games it’s unreal. Almost like someone walked over to the park, found a drunk asleep on a bench and gave him a kit.

Good player a few years ago but way too much time spent out of first team action.

Hopefully we won’t see him many more times in a city shirt.

Lansbury-Dinning!

Hes not showing me anything i didnt expect from seeing him against us several times. 
Huge ego. Lazy. Living off of his ‘name’ and Arsenal connections. 
Another in our long list of financial cluster####s! 
Yes he might be unfit but this is the epitomy of wage stealing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Sorry, do you want the names of the left backs Ashton identified? There was 3 of them, if that helps.

The Lansdowns love a PR signing and Lansbury fitted that bill. Simple as that. 

That has to be nonsense.

A PR signing? Maybe 5 years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Bristol_Badger said:

Pretty sure Pearson made the sub (could be wrong)... unless someone saw Ashton or Jon Lansdown down there? 

Pearson chose to bring him on and not HNM so why are we bashing Lansbury?

The new scapegoat for uneducated BristolCity fans.

That’s ok then. Managers decision to bring me on so he can take the blame for my woeful contribution!

We are bashing Lansbury as tonight was another one of many underwhelming performances. Hopefully Pearson has seen enough of Lansbury already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Sorry, do you want the names of the left backs Ashton identified? There was 3 of them, if that helps.

The Lansdowns love a PR signing and Lansbury fitted that bill. Simple as that. 

Yes please. 

So you’re saying this is Jons version of David (his previous game was at the World Cup) James ? 

So Holden had no say what so ever? 

Also, How the hell is he perceived to be a good PR exercise? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, formerly known as ivan said:

Why oh why??? What a waste of a wage. Looks so clear off the pace of games it’s unreal. Almost like someone walked over to the park, found a drunk asleep on a bench and gave him a kit.

Good player a few years ago but way too much time spent out of first team action.

Hopefully we won’t see him many more times in a city shirt.

He's like King Midas in reverse. Everything he touches turns to shit.

And I'm only saying this because it's true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Clevedon Red said:

 

That says a lot. Could not find a pass if his life depended on it. Utter dross at the moment and we all know it including him and the gaffer. 
 

However form is temporary. Although Dean Smith would think he hasn’t shown any of that for three years. Feels like a Dinning signing without the good bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Henri Lansbury wasn't signed cus he's a name.

Also, Lansbury thread has 1.5k views and 58 replies and counting in one hour, more activity than any other post-match thread.

:phone:

And more activity than Henri Lansbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Henri Lansbury wasn't signed cus he's a name.

Also, Lansbury thread has 1.5k views and 58 replies and counting in one hour, more activity than any other post-match thread.

:phone:

Because he is a needlessly pointless signing that looks trash. 

I dont think this is the "PR" the club had in mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...