Jump to content
IGNORED

Derby again!


Greedo

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, downendcity said:

Wayne Rooney is obviously feeling hard done by. 

What man wouldn't be if, when alone in a hotel room with 3 attractive and scantily clad women, the only thing he can manage is to fall asleep! 

Would you say the same to a girl in a hotel room with 3 attractive men?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MarcusX said:

Such an odd statement

It was a cheap dig at one of the most right wing, racist media outlets in the country....they need very little to twist things and make something the fault of the non-white English. Ergo, blackmail to black male isn't such a leap for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shaun Taylor said:

Things are on a knife edge and that's just at Derby....

IMG_3851.PNG

Derby will take tough action and sack Richard Keogh again as he's obviously the guilty party here. Don't see why the fact that he is at Blackpool should make any difference. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, chinapig said:

Derby will take tough action and sack Richard Keogh again as he's obviously the guilty party here. Don't see why the fact that he is at Blackpool should make any difference. ?

It wouldn't be Wayne Rooney's  Derby County  if they didn't sack Richard Keogh again?

IMG_3852.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marco the red said:

Can derby afford to sack him.....or is he being paid by that betting firm.

If in breach of something….and they can rightly sack him, should cost them nothing.  That’s what they tried to do win Keogh…but expect the lawsuit to follow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/07/2021 at 12:29, Wiltshire robin said:

Find it hard to feel sorry for his wife after she keeps taking him back , surely comes a point where you think I look like a right mug staying with him

Yes there is.

It’s the point just before you have another look at his bank balance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CodeRed said:

He prefers this though 

image.thumb.png.04bdafd2e879ab253b2465fd5833dc50.png

 

And only £45 a pop.....who could resist! ?

I’m surprised she was prepared to pay Rooney that much! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Bard said:

Forgot that detail.  

 

They really are ****ed aren't they 

IIRC the betting company increased their sponsorship deal with Derby by the amount of Rooney’s wages - rumoured to be about £5m pa. - on the basis that it was worth it to them to have a player of Rooney’s standing wearing their name on the Derby shirt.

I think I‘m right in saying the betting company could not pay Rooney directly, as this would have repercussions around ffp and quite obviously Derby wouldn't want to tarnish their standing by breaching ffp rules, would they?! In view of this it would be interesting to know whether their is any wording on the sponsorship agreement that addresses a reduction in the sponsorship amount should Rooney no longer be employed by the club. If there was/is then would it be close to being third party ownership?  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...