dREDful Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 (edited) No. Course not FFS. A knackered Wells was so much more useful as a focal point than COD. Could see the equaliser coming a mile off once that happened. Ball just kept coming back. EDIT - because this is going over some heads. I don't believe COD made the tactical decision, so I don't blame him for the stupidity. Edited October 19, 2021 by dREDful 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onlyotib Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 3 minutes ago, dREDful said: No. Course not FFS. A knackered Wells was so much more useful as a focal point than COD. Could see the equaliser coming a mile off once that happened. Ball just kept coming back. Totally agree and he’s still robbing a living but I’m sure we will all see a video on Instagram tomorrow of him doing something world class for 5 seconds to put him on the bench for next week but we will all never see him actually produce it In a match. Please get rid ASAP 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firstdivision Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 The ball came back pretty much all second half. At least, it did in the game I was watching. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexhill reds Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, dREDful said: No. Course not FFS. A knackered Wells was so much more useful as a focal point than COD. Could see the equaliser coming a mile off once that happened. Ball just kept coming back. Nope, but on soggy pitch with tired defenders, O’Dowda running at pace with balls over the top and down channels made perfect sense, Wells was knackered. Our problem was they looked for O’Dowda as the target man to win and hold up rather than chase down.. not defending the player, but the idea made sense with the alternatives they had. Edited October 19, 2021 by bexhill reds 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richyy66 Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 Odowda was not at fault for the last few mminutes of madness. I agree i think he should be moved on but to blame him for the defeat is a little harsh. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firstdivision Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 minute ago, richyy66 said: Odowda was not at fault for the last few mminutes of madness. I agree i think he should be moved on but to blame him for the defeat is a little harsh. Not only harsh, it’s utterly ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dREDful Posted October 19, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 Sorry, should state I'm not having a pop at COD for this. It wasn't his mental idea to make this tactical blunder. 2 minutes ago, richyy66 said: Odowda was not at fault for the last few mminutes of madness. I agree i think he should be moved on but to blame him for the defeat is a little harsh. Just now, firstdivision said: Not only harsh, it’s utterly ridiculous. See above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 Always a way to blame COD it seems. Scapegoat 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigAl&Toby Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 5 minutes ago, bexhill reds said: Nope, but on soggy pitch with tired defenders, O’Dowda running at pace with balls over the top and down channels made perfect sense, Wells was knackered. Our problem was they looked for O’Dowda as the target man to win and hold up rather than chase down.. not defending the player, but the idea made sense with the alternatives they had. It made absolutely no ******* sense. What would have made sense would have been for Captain Dan to realise his constant lumping it down the middle wasn’t working and to have tried something different. But oh no. If at first you don’t succeed then just keep trying it. Again and again….. Christ if it didn’t work with Martin on the pitch it sure as hell wasn’t going to work with him off it… 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDOXO Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 4 minutes ago, bexhill reds said: Nope, but on soggy pitch with tired defenders, O’Dowda running at pace with balls over the top and down channels made perfect sense, Wells was knackered. Our problem was they looked for O’Dowda as the target man to win and hold up rather than chase down.. not defending the player, but the idea made sense with the alternatives they had. Sigh. Yes instead of retaining possession we pumped long high aimless balls for ODowda to jump for rather than long high aimless balls for Odwda to chase into the corners.. We did one or both because we could not string three passes together anywhere on the pitch in front of the defence. WE looked leggy, because as someone said on radio Brizz we were chasing out of possession the entire game and they were all knackered by 70minutes. AS PER USUAL AT HOME! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big dosser Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 im not a cod fan but come on you cant blame him for the last 3 mins of bloody comical defending 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Williams Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 minute ago, big dosser said: im not a cod fan but come on you cant blame him for the last 3 mins of bloody comical defending No but him being a suitable replacement for Wells is debatable when his contribution is largely total pish 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexhill reds Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 (edited) 8 minutes ago, BigAl&Toby said: It made absolutely no ******* sense. What would have made sense would have been for Captain Dan to realise his constant lumping it down the middle wasn’t working and to have tried something different. But oh no. If at first you don’t succeed then just keep trying it. Again and again….. Christ if it didn’t work with Martin on the pitch it sure as hell wasn’t going to work with him off it… Right so trying to get pace on the pitch was a bad idea? Agreed that lumping the ball at him was not going to work, but getting him running into the corners as an outlet surely makes sense, especially against tired defenders even if only to stretch the pitch out a bit, I’d argue that this was the best option with what was on the bench, just a poorly executed. Especially when the remaining bench options were Simpson, Pring and Bakinson. Edited October 19, 2021 by bexhill reds 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dREDful Posted October 19, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 minute ago, bexhill reds said: Right so trying to get pace on the pitch was a bad idea? Agreed that lumping the ball at him was not going to work, but getting him running into the corners as an outlet surely makes sense, especially against tired defenders even if only to stretch the pitch out a bit, I’d argue that this was the best option with what was on the bench, just a poorly executed. We knocked it into the corners for him twice and he was flat footed and staring the ball passing him. Again, not on him. It's on the manager. He shouldn't be asked to the job he was asked to at such an important time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big dosser Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 Just now, Feral Williams said: No but him being a suitable replacement for Wells is debatable when his contribution is largely total pish i agree with that but there's only one man that choose to do that and that is big nige.as much as i want big nige to succeed i am starting to worry about some of his tactics and for me cod should be nowhere near this side 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dREDful Posted October 19, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 minute ago, big dosser said: i agree with that but there's only one man that choose to do that and that is big nige.as much as i want big nige to succeed i am starting to worry about some of his tactics and for me cod should be nowhere near this side Which was my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexhill reds Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 Just now, dREDful said: We knocked it into the corners for him twice and he was flat footed and staring the ball passing him. Again, not on him. It's on the manager. He shouldn't be asked to the job he was asked to at such an important time. But what options did Pearson have, Bakinson - worse than O’Dowda, and two full backs at a time where we needed to have the ball at the other end of the pitch… I don’t think O’Dowda is the answer to many questions as a rule, but he was the best answer to the one of Wells going off knackered, with the options available on the bench at the time… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t_b Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 Wells pressed no one and let their keeper set up their attacks with the ball at his feet just outside the centre circle. He was done. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, bexhill reds said: But what options did Pearson have, Bakinson - worse than O’Dowda, and two full backs at a time where we needed to have the ball at the other end of the pitch… I don’t think O’Dowda is the answer to many questions as a rule, but he was the best answer to the one of Wells going off knackered, with the options available on the bench at the time… Bell and Janneh were with the team but didn’t make the squad, Bell the extra sub Incase of injury I believe as well. Edited October 19, 2021 by Lrrr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexhill reds Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 25 minutes ago, firstdivision said: The ball came back pretty much all second half. At least, it did in the game I was watching. The only way they’re going to solve that is with the chequebook or from proceeds from selling Bentley or Kalas. None of the front three tonight can hold the ball up, we’ve never replaced Wilbraham. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexhill reds Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 2 minutes ago, Lrrr said: Bell and Janneh were with the team but didn’t make the squad, Bell the extra sub Incase of injury I believe as well. You could make a case for Janneh over O’Dowda right now, but wether they’ve gone for experience over rawness or by what they’ve seen in training, we won’t know. Janneh is a good shout though… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswood Robin Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 If O'Dowda is the answer, what on earth is the question?! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernard Lerring Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 Using cod and palmer to protect a lead is like using a rizla as flood protection 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexhill reds Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 6 minutes ago, Kingswood Robin said: If O'Dowda is the answer, what on earth is the question?! Who would you replace your knackered striker with when you have 2 full backs, a lazy midfielder and a goal keeper on the bench…. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswood Robin Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 2 minutes ago, bexhill reds said: Who would you replace your knackered striker with when you have 2 full backs, a lazy midfielder and a goal keeper on the bench…. I was talking generally. Pearson is slowly making changes, but we have assembled some crap, as you've somewhat alluded to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bexhill reds Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 minute ago, Kingswood Robin said: I was talking generally. Pearson is slowly making changes, but we have assembled some crap, as you've somewhat alluded to. Agreed, that was the only question where O’Dowda is a positive answer. I’m not sure he’s done anything else of note since that Norwich goal. Time to see what Janneh can do…. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 57 minutes ago, richyy66 said: Odowda was not at fault for the last few mminutes of madness. I agree i think he should be moved on but to blame him for the defeat is a little harsh. 55 minutes ago, firstdivision said: Not only harsh, it’s utterly ridiculous. Yep, not his fault tonight at all. Wells knackered. Someone on another post said Bakinson should’ve been brought on to see out the game….jeez. Its always easy to blame the subs when points are dropped. With the options available: Massengo on for a tired Martin made sense, swapping Weimann to play upfront. Scott, tiring, on a yellow (desperate not to trip their player bursting beyond him) needed taking off. Bakinson or Palmer? Palmer for me, he tackles, doesn’t stroll around. Wells tired, put in a great shift tonight, who else? O’Dowda for his legs…had logic. The problem with tonight was more the shape in reaction to Forest’s changes than the personnel per se. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted October 20, 2021 Report Share Posted October 20, 2021 I think the answer to our striking problems is a player we don’t have. A Diedhiou type player would have given the defence some protection and given them something to worry about. We don’t have too many players who give the opposition any concern. It’s too easy to come here and dominate. That has to be addressed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Horse With No Name Posted October 20, 2021 Report Share Posted October 20, 2021 5 hours ago, Davefevs said: Yep, not his fault tonight at all. Wells knackered. Someone on another post said Bakinson should’ve been brought on to see out the game….jeez. Its always easy to blame the subs when points are dropped. With the options available: Massengo on for a tired Martin made sense, swapping Weimann to play upfront. Scott, tiring, on a yellow (desperate not to trip their player bursting beyond him) needed taking off. Bakinson or Palmer? Palmer for me, he tackles, doesn’t stroll around. Wells tired, put in a great shift tonight, who else? O’Dowda for his legs…had logic. The problem with tonight was more the shape in reaction to Forest’s changes than the personnel per se. Funny how none of our opposition players ever look " tired " though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Team Posted October 20, 2021 Report Share Posted October 20, 2021 5 hours ago, Kingswood Robin said: If O'Dowda is the answer, what on earth is the question?! Who is the best player to be in the stands with the fans not on the pitch? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.