Riaz Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Didnt go today, but this post is looking at the bigger picture. City have played 59 games now in this division and have done well. About half of those games Dele Adebola has played. If we rewind to last season, we played the first 29 games without a target man or much phyiscal presence up front. But we were still right up there..... in fact we were joint top League Table after 29 games At the time, there was alot of pressure on the manager to make a signing, so we could make a sustained "push" for the Premier League.... At first glance the signing of Dele Adebola, was uninspired to some - but it provided us with some much needed physical presence...... or so it seemed But since then, we have turned into a long ball team. I've no problem with that if we were winning just as much. But our players (apart from dele) just arent suited to that style of play. One positive point I should make, is that Dele Adebola is very hardworking and wins alot in the air. But having said that If players were picked on hardwork/commitment alone, I'd be city captain, Bas Savage would still be here, and city would be plummeting down to non league football! don't get me wrong, Dele is good at what he does. he's a good target man at this level. I just don't think he suits our side and our side does not suit long ball. I think Dele would be very sucessful in a Neil Warnock side, for example. But does the stats back-up my opinion?? that we have not been the same since we signed our big target man? Our record before we signed Dele in the championship Pld 29 Won 14 Dr 9 Lost 6 Points 51 Points per game: 1.76 Since Dele has signed and played in every game: Pld 30 Won 11 Dr 9 Lost 10 Points 40 points per game 1.33 We've gone from a promotion pushing side, to an average side, since we signed the AND changed our style of play. I will still support Dele Adebola whilst he's wearing the red shirt, but I don't think we will get promotion with him in our side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 That's it then, get rid of Dele and watch us roar up the table, I'll just give GJ a call.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Think you will find In the first 29 games we played most of them with a 5 man midfield Just like we did to get into the championship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Think you will find In the first 29 games we played most of them with a 5 man midfield Just like we did to get into the championship I wouldn't mind seeing a return to a 5 man midfield if I'm honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riaz Posted October 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Think you will find In the first 29 games we played most of them with a 5 man midfield Just like we did to get into the championship yeah okay....what was wrong with that and why change our style of play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daisybcfc Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 That's it then, get rid of Dele and watch us roar up the table, I'll just give GJ a call.......... thats not what RIAZ is saying so what is the point of posting, its not helping anyone posting sarcastic remarks. I do understand where RIAZ is coming from though, I think playing with Dele up top makes us very 2D and boring. We played such amazing football at points last season and most of the time we played with someone supporting a lone striker. I think we should go back to this by having either Trundle or Noble behind either Maynard or Brooker. Thats how we play the best football, the sooner we get back to that, the sooner we get back on the winning end of matches... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 I do understand where RIAZ is coming from though, I think playing with Dele up top makes us very 2D and boring. We played such amazing football at points last season and most of the time we played with someone supporting a lone striker. I think we should go back to this by having either Trundle or Noble behind either Maynard or Brooker. Thats how we play the best football, the sooner we get back to that, the sooner we get back on the winning end of matches... Brooker? What are we going to do, ask to play a game every couple of months, then? You also cannot seriously believe Maynard who is small and not the most robust, would be able to play the lone striker role at this level. I believe Adebola is still worth a place but can understand the argument for saying we should play 2 other strikers, but an injury plagued one or a small youngster on their own up top? No way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lack of Action Man Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Sell him in January and use Akinde who has the chance to be far better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fka dagest Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 I generally agree that with Dele's presence we have become a rather predictable long ball side. However, there's no reason why we still l can't play a decent passing game with people putting over crosses from the wings rather than down the middle. In short, Adebola isn't the problem it's the system. I can't help but think that GJ might have been impressed by the Stoke system that got them up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daisybcfc Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Brooker? What are we going to do, ask to play a game every couple of months, then? You also cannot seriously believe Maynard who is small and not the most robust, would be able to play the lone striker role at this level. I believe Adebola is still worth a place but can understand the argument for saying we should play 2 other strikers, but an injury plagued one or a small youngster on their own up top? No way. I know Brooker is injury prone but when he is fit he's our best striker by far. I think Maynard could play well with a midfield of Sproule...Elliott...Noble...McIndoe ....Trundle...... ...Maynard..... With those players around him I think he'll turn into the player we all want him to be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 thats not what RIAZ is saying so what is the point of posting, its not helping anyone posting sarcastic remarks. I do understand where RIAZ is coming from though, I think playing with Dele up top makes us very 2D and boring. We played such amazing football at points last season and most of the time we played with someone supporting a lone striker. I think we should go back to this by having either Trundle or Noble behind either Maynard or Brooker. Thats how we play the best football, the sooner we get back to that, the sooner we get back on the winning end of matches... I'm not being sarcastic. Its being suggested that we play wooooosh-ball because Dele's in the side. I believe Dele is in the side on merit but we woosh it because there's not enough quality in the side, and its set up at the moment, not to play through the midfield. We need to get the talent back on the pitch(DN, LT etc) and maybe revert to a lone striker. Brooker cant play more than twice in a row and I don't think Nicky Maynard at the moment looks strong enough to play the loan striker role. Dele, however is strong/experienced enough and there is more to his game than being 'a big bloke up front'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riaz Posted October 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 I'm not being sarcastic. Its being suggested that we play wooooosh-ball because Dele's in the side. I believe Dele is in the side on merit but we woosh it because there's not enough quality in the side, and its set up at the moment, not to play through the midfield. We need to get the talent back on the pitch(DN, LT etc) and maybe revert to a lone striker. Brooker cant play more than twice in a row and I don't think Nicky Maynard at the moment looks strong enough to play the loan striker role. Dele, however is strong/experienced enough and there is more to his game than being 'a big bloke up front'. how can this be? we got the same personnell at the back and in midfield. Where has this quality gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keepers Ball Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 With Adebola the side are forever trying to hit the ball to him.One dimensional and predictable.As much as i appreciate his work rate I find him too slow, clumsy and doesnt win as many headers as I'd like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 how can this be? we got the same personnell at the back and in midfield. Where has this quality gone? Well, DN and LT have gone to the bench, Marv's just returning, and NC(like him or not, he could run at teams with the ball at his feet) has gone to Colin. I should also like to add that I'm one of the people that thinks we should've added more quality to the team in the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 With Adebola the side are forever trying to hit the ball to him.One dimensional and predictable.As much as i appreciate his work rate I find him too slow, clumsy and doesnt win as many headers as I'd like. Very good reason not to woooosh it to him all the time then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 yeah okay....what was wrong with that and why change our style of play? The only thing wrong with that imo was we didt have a player who could play up front on his own I'm sure adebola could do a job SO i would be more than happy to go 4-5-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mightyreds89 Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 I'm not saying GJ job is easy but to me it's simple when Nobes and Trundle play we retain the ball in the opposition half and get the ball out to the wingers. Something we have only done once this season and when was this when Noble and Trunds were on 2nd half V's Plymouth. Midfield should be Sproule Noble Elliott McIndoe With Trundle just behind Maynard I have been saying since Dele arrived we have chnaged our game and our football was at it's best mid to end of 2007, and only been the same once or twice since ie Crystal Palace home and away plays and even though we lost last year at Sheff Utd away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almondsbury_red Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Didnt go today, but this post is looking at the bigger picture. City have played 59 games now in this division and have done well. About half of those games Dele Adebola has played. If we rewind to last season, we played the first 29 games without a target man or much phyiscal presence up front. But we were still right up there..... in fact we were joint top League Table after 29 games At the time, there was alot of pressure on the manager to make a signing, so we could make a sustained "push" for the Premier League.... At first glance the signing of Dele Adebola, was uninspired to some - but it provided us with some much needed physical presence...... or so it seemed But since then, we have turned into a long ball team. I've no problem with that if we were winning just as much. But our players (apart from dele) just arent suited to that style of play. One positive point I should make, is that Dele Adebola is very hardworking and wins alot in the air. But having said that If players were picked on hardwork/commitment alone, I'd be city captain, Bas Savage would still be here, and city would be plummeting down to non league football! don't get me wrong, Dele is good at what he does. he's a good target man at this level. I just don't think he suits our side and our side does not suit long ball. I think Dele would be very sucessful in a Neil Warnock side, for example. But does the stats back-up my opinion?? that we have not been the same since we signed our big target man? Our record before we signed Dele in the championship Pld 29 Won 14 Dr 9 Lost 6 Points 51 Points per game: 1.76 Since Dele has signed and played in every game: Pld 30 Won 11 Dr 9 Lost 10 Points 40 points per game 1.33 We've gone from a promotion pushing side, to an average side, since we signed the AND changed our style of play. I will still support Dele Adebola whilst he's wearing the red shirt, but I don't think we will get promotion with him in our side. i couldn't agree more with you mate. whenever he's in the team we just lump the ball to him and he very rarely wins the ball in the air and flicks it anywere near anyone in a red shirt. he runs around but just doesn't have the quality too be in a team who want too challenge for promotion. i'd much sooner see maynard/akinde/trundle or brooker playing ahead of him. most of our best performances have come when he's not in the side. having him in he team is just an excuse too lump the ball forwards and not pass it on the floor which is terrible too watch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 With Adebola the side are forever trying to hit the ball to him.One dimensional and predictable.As much as i appreciate his work rate I find him too slow, clumsy and doesnt win as many headers as I'd like. If the midfield played the ball on the ground to feet He wouldnt HAVE to win as many headers!!! Saying that If we played the ball to feet it would be worth having Trundle in the side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keepers Ball Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Very good reason not to woooosh it to him all the time then! Better still don't start him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riaz Posted October 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 If the midfield played the ball on the ground to feet He wouldnt HAVE to win as many headers!!! but why arent they playing it to feet? they did for fun before dele came. And successfully at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daisybcfc Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Well, DN and LT have gone to the bench, Marv's just returning, and NC(like him or not, he could run at teams with the ball at his feet) has gone to Colin. I should also like to add that I'm one of the people that thinks we should've added more quality to the team in the summer. I'm a fan of Carle but he only arrived in january too, our team for the first half of last season is the same plus Dele. We've got to go back to the attractive style of football we used to play, when Sproule, Johnson, Elliott, McIndoe, Noble and Trundle were our attacking 6, they're all still here so they should be playing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NifflerNomad Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 i agree to, we should go back to 4-5-1, i like dele, but this season its been wooosh football! LT & DN should be in from the start imo! look back at last season @ sheff utd & palace we, IMO, out passed them esp sheff utd, then look at the first half tuesday, we were sh!te, woooosh to dele and it just came back! LT comes on we play our game and got to goals! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daisybcfc Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 i agree to, we should go back to 4-5-1, i like dele, but this season its been wooosh football! LT & DN should be in from the start imo! look back at last season @ sheff utd & palace we, IMO, out passed them esp sheff utd, then look at the first half tuesday, we were sh!te, woooosh to dele and it just came back! LT comes on we play our game and got to goals! Sheffield United at home last season was a perfect example of having Noble in the team, he looked quality in his role of the 4-5-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YattonRed Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Hmmm I have often wondered what is best. There is no doubt about it I believe we have resorted to the long ball in recent. Don't get me wrong I think Dele is a good intelligent physical footballer and his work rate over 90mins is unbelievable. The trouble is when pushing out of our own box up to the half way line it is always inevitable some player hoofs it on up, when there are more options that can be created. This season I have noticed Orr is one of the main culprits and boom boom does this when in the squad. With the presence of Dele our style of play has changed and we don't make use of the wings like we used to, hence the reason Maynard has not been the poacher we bought him for. Midfield is where a game is won or lost and the Plymouth game proves how much we need Trundle in the squad. I would personally play 4 5 1. Trundle will sit in front the midfield of Johnson and Elliot with akinde or Maynard in front. Trundle is the key to our midfield woes we just have to play him as an attacking midfielder. Having Trundle in front on attack will help because we wont just hoof ball and encourage intelligent play spreading in and out of the wings. Sorry Dele. So: Basso McAllister, Carey, Fontaine, Orr. McIndoe, Elliot, Johnson, Sproule Trundle Maynard or Akinde Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Red Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Didnt go today, but this post is looking at the bigger picture. City have played 59 games now in this division and have done well. About half of those games Dele Adebola has played. If we rewind to last season, we played the first 29 games without a target man or much phyiscal presence up front. But we were still right up there..... in fact we were joint top League Table after 29 games At the time, there was alot of pressure on the manager to make a signing, so we could make a sustained "push" for the Premier League.... At first glance the signing of Dele Adebola, was uninspired to some - but it provided us with some much needed physical presence...... or so it seemed But since then, we have turned into a long ball team. I've no problem with that if we were winning just as much. But our players (apart from dele) just arent suited to that style of play. One positive point I should make, is that Dele Adebola is very hardworking and wins alot in the air. But having said that If players were picked on hardwork/commitment alone, I'd be city captain, Bas Savage would still be here, and city would be plummeting down to non league football! don't get me wrong, Dele is good at what he does. he's a good target man at this level. I just don't think he suits our side and our side does not suit long ball. I think Dele would be very sucessful in a Neil Warnock side, for example. But does the stats back-up my opinion?? that we have not been the same since we signed our big target man? Our record before we signed Dele in the championship Pld 29 Won 14 Dr 9 Lost 6 Points 51 Points per game: 1.76 Since Dele has signed and played in every game: Pld 30 Won 11 Dr 9 Lost 10 Points 40 points per game 1.33 We've gone from a promotion pushing side, to an average side, since we signed the AND changed our style of play. I will still support Dele Adebola whilst he's wearing the red shirt, but I don't think we will get promotion with him in our side. I posted something similar after the Brum game and i seemed to get slatted for it, Dele is a good pllayer but unfortunatly if you play a target man you get target man football, which in a word is hoof ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 but why arent they playing it to feet? they did for fun before dele came. And successfully at that. At the start of last season i think most fans thought it would be real tough and so got right behind the team even when things went wrong When the fans are like that its easier for players to "play" After finishing 4th some fans seem to think we will/should walk it this season but because we are not they seem to be picking up on every little mistake Get behind the team like we did last season and we just might see a bit better football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NifflerNomad Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 At the start of last season i think most fans thought it would be real tough and so got right behind the team even when things went wrong When the fans are like that its easier for players to "play" After finishing 4th some fans seem to think we will/should walk it this season but because we are not they seem to be picking up on every little mistake Get behind the team like we did last season and we just might see a bit better football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mart Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 If we play with a big target man, then we will aim for the target, and hoof it to him. ~Dele cannot hold on to the ball, can't win it in the air and can't lay it off.. :huh: If we play without a target man, we will HAVE to play it up through the midfield and create more. Maynard/Trundle/akinda or some combination of 2 off them seems to me to be more constructive and more our style of play. I really do not understand GJ fixation with a big target man up front, unless he thinks the players do not have the skills and talent to play anything else. I think we do, and we proved it last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanC Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Adebola is fast turning into another Enoch IMHO. Despite being built like a shit brick house he doesn't win enough headers and when he does win them they go to nobody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.