johnwilkinson

I note that yet again a certain poster has succesfully derailed a serious thread into an irrelevant siding.

Is point not that posts are moved after 48 hours of inactivity but that they are not reinstated on the main forum  when there is  new life ? 

1 hour ago, Silvio Dante said:

 

- If you choose to leave under GDPR then you’re gone for good, and if you create another account, if in the mods opinion that is the same user, that also gets banned

 

I wish to fully support this view as a practical solution to the problem of those who seek to deceive fellow members of the forum who come here to discuss football with like minded supporters

19 minutes ago, Northern Red said:

The Dog has been let back in then...

Well spotted Northern Red . Yet another "long term observer" suddenly motivated to loose his virginity and spout half a page of sh-t -stirring in pure innocent naiveity.

1 hour ago, Robbored said:

I may be a lot of things but sexiest, racist and bigoted are not applicable to me.

If you hadn't previously noticed ,Robbored today admits " SEXIEST "" not applcable to me."

1 hour ago, Robbored said:

I may be a lot of things but sexiest, racist and bigoted are not applicable to me.

If you hadn't previously noticed ,Robbored today admits " SEXIEST "" not applcable to me."

Keith Millen

 The Daily Mail alleges  Crystal Palace have made an approach subsequent to Bournemouth's bids.

Would we sell Bentley to a near rival in the Chamionship  table?

.

1 hour ago, Harry said:

Not trying to score internet points Triple T. I’m simply very concerned at the way the summer recruitment was handled and it needs to change asap. I’m allowed to be concerned for the state of my football club, am I not? 
You’ve clearly spoken to Sean, who has clearly acknowledged to you that things haven’t been working fantastically. So I am right to be concerned then, yes? 
As for the naming of the individual - he works at a professional football club with Premier League ambition, in a major role within that organisation and has conducted public interviews with the press - are you suggesting that because he’s your mate he should be exempt from public scrutiny - the scrutiny of paying supporters of 40 years. Is it any different to calling out a manager, coach, player, owner, etc? 
Sounds very much like he doesn’t want the role he’s been ‘stuck’ in, as you say. 
Even more reason why my post carries more relevance. It’s clearly an issue. 
As I said in the opening post - I have no personal issue with Sean, and I’m sure he’s a nice guy and is a good data analyst. I hope he returns to the role he enjoys and has the skill set for as soon as possible. He obviously doesn’t want to be in the role he’s had to fulfil, which 100% backs up the main point of this thread - we need an experienced head of recruitment asap so that Sean can go back to what he’s comfortable doing. 
Your replies on this clearly suggest that both you, and Sean himself, know this to be true and I wish him all the best back in the role he is good at. 

250+ posts spread over eight pages in two days  suggest this is a matter of genuine concern and widespread interest.

Ban the troll.

5 hours ago, 22A said:

Of the 22 teams then in Div 1 only ten still are. Of the 24 teams In Div 3 (S), four are currently in the Prem and eight others have been in either Div 1 or the Prem.

Haven't NINE others been in either Div 1 or the Prem?

Is it not likely that Sainsburys have tried to protect their position as to costs by a Payment into Court?  Should BLBR not recover damages exceeding any Payment into Court ,Sainsburys would be entitled to their costs from the date of Payment In despite   "losing "  the case.