Nescot

Twine is worth every penny anything 4mil or under sign.

Can’t say anything positive it’s not allowed on here.

Just now, stokes7 said:

I did and he didn’t like it, hence I said he doesn’t like being challenged 

When were you on there? 

Just now, stokes7 said:

Good for you someone has to be

I like people who say it as it is - and if you think someone is talking shit then say it, that’s why I think he is good value.

Just now, stokes7 said:

Doesn’t upset me I’m just telling it how it is, not my fault you lick his bum 

I am a fan tbh. 

3 minutes ago, stokes7 said:

That is total crap he doesn’t like being challenged, and I actually remember a pod the other week you were on, what a melt you are

Why does he upset you so much why are you sensitive. 

Just now, Silvio Dante said:

See you in a few days Lez mate. Look forward to the next account. 

Probably during transfer window when we sign a few players. 

Just now, Silvio Dante said:

Keep up, he was on holiday so couldnt get on here.

That bloody World Wide Web and its misleading name.

@Moderator - Unless I’ve understood the terms of the forum incorrectly then banned users aren’t allowed to sign up under a new ID (as has happened here as the signup was on Thursday, conveniently the day after @Ian M barred a couple of his other IDs.

I believe Lezzie here had just admitted to a breach of forum rules and in order to keep this account active must provide you with his prior accounts so you can check his reason for bans and determine if he is allowed to post.

Rules. Just like understanding formations, they’re bastards.

Don’t bother me.

Just now, stokes7 said:

Gives his opinion, he’s an idiot and he throws his toys out the pram if you confront his bull

I’ve challenged him on the pod never had an issue with him. People don’t like him because he says it how he sees it, which I think is a positive 

1 minute ago, formerly known as ivan said:

Seen enough to know today wasn’t a one off. What have happened over the last few games is the exception rather than the norm.

As I said before, if you are happy with what you see then good luck to you. Just staying where I am at with it.

Why does the ban not surprise me?

Just say it how it is mate, on here, pod, real life.

Just now, stokes7 said:

Ian gay is a so not surprised you’re a fan

Why is he? Because he gives his opinion? Think a lot of people who moan about him it says more about you than anything else.

Just now, formerly known as ivan said:

That’s you’re argument?

If you don’t mind me asking, how old are you and what’s your connection to the club, seeing as you seem to know more about the people involved than you do the football?

Posted on here previously, got banned. Re sign up now and (not nearly as much as people say) and give my opinion, also occasionally on the POD. no connection, just a fan. I’m a member of the Ian Gay fan club though, think he’s great - Dave Fevs doesn’t, because he gets fed information that he wanted.

Just now, formerly known as ivan said:

So what were you laughing at?

You. Obviously. 

Just now, Silvio Dante said:

For once I agree with you, a number of forum posters have said what you’re saying. There was Lez, there was Zuni, there was Londoner, there was Dog, there was you, there was Hunstanton Red, there was CiaCru…..

A good effort but worth noting that half the people who are accused of being ‘Lez’ isn’t, there was one a few weeks ago was DMing even saying they were me, I was on holiday and not on here.

Just now, Nescot said:

A good effort but worth noting that half the people who are accused of being ‘Lez’ isn’t, there was one a few weeks ago was DMing even saying they were me, I was on holiday and not on here.

Or this Simon Parker nonsense no idea what that is about.

Just now, formerly known as ivan said:

Yes, an opinion I was entitled to have based on being at the match! How can you start shouting your mouth off when you weren’t even there? Do you go to any games?

I was laughing at you and your thread rather than shouting my mouth off.

Just now, W-S-M Seagull said:

Why won't you cry about it? 

I will be. Standing still/regressing is not acceptable. 

You won’t be crying. 

Just now, formerly known as ivan said:

You are a clown!

Have you seen the first post of the thread you started.

Just now, glynriley said:

3 days old poster, who ‘watches’ games on the radio,calling people out. 
 

Tell Mr Lansdown to let you into the match, that’s the least a club employee should expect. 
 

You can tell him to SUFU as well if you like. 

You’re late to the party mate. 

Just now, formerly known as ivan said:

So were you even at the game? Cus it was clearly a back three!

No. Going by what com said.

1 minute ago, Davefevs said:

Haha, just seen the quoted post.

So many false statements in there. Bit embarrassing.  Bless!

Of course they are Dave…..

1 minute ago, glynriley said:

@Davefevs have you “licked” desperately? Treat your woman with respect man…

Look im sure he’s a nice chap but don’t go begging for a job and then turn on people when you don’t get it. Weak. 

1 minute ago, petehinton said:

Awkward 

I went of what the com said. 

Just now, Steve Watts said:

You really are a strange little troll, aren't you? I just don't get the point....

What’s strange is trying desperately to get a job in the club, getting turned down, and then turning on individuals out of spite. He says it himself about Ian Gay, I and a number of other forum members have picked up on it.

3 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I think the troll listened to the commentary and didn’t watch what actually happened.  I have plenty of screenshots too.

 

You’re the person who tried desperately to get a role in the club only to get knocked back - that’s when you started slagging off Tinnion and the club. Very transparent and now your main hobby is slagging off Ian Gay because he gets the info you licked desperately for only to get knocked back.

Just now, noize said:

I take your point onboard, i was talking in more general terms, but obviously also today, however, i would agree more if we were playing Leicester, Ipswich, Leeds etc, even with a make shift defence, why do we need to show so much respect to Huddersfield, fighting relegation, and we are at home? Surely we could have gone at it a little more?

We didn’t, they played well. Give credit to opposition this is the championship - Leeds didn’t lay a glove on Blackburn and we hit 5 past them. Coventry beat Leeds last week and got battered by Brum today. You are not going to dominate every week don’t happen.

3 minutes ago, noize said:

What i find irritating is negative style tactics, when you're  at home, playing a team in trouble i would rather go all out at them. I don't want to see "protective football!" in a game i believe we can win. I think Manning is trying to do the right thing by adjusting the team and tactics each game to suite our opponent, which is the right thing to do, however, i have to be honest, I was a fan of the Newcastle model under Keegan (we will attack and attack and hopefully score more than you), for example i would rather see a game we lost 3-4 and we really went at it than negative tactics. I believe if we had more confidence and went for the attack we would win more than we would lose. I might be completely wrong, but i would enjoy the exciting football either way. I feel the same about England.

Can’t go all out against anyone with a makeshift CB pairing.

Just now, Sir Geoff said:

Mcrorie,Tanner,Roberts

Sykes and Pring wing backs 

No they weren’t, it was 4231