Southport Red Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Please vote on which of the following will occur tonight - we can review tomorrow. 1) Palace win, therefore, by definition, no cheating takes place 2) Draw, Ipswich therefore; a) Cheated b) Paid the Ref off c) The Ref is actually Roy Keane's Brother-in-Law d) The Ref added too much extra time/too little extra time (delete as appropriate) 3) Ipswich win in which case a) This is another example of the conspiracy against Palace. Don't Ipswich KNOW how hard it is for Colin? If they were gentlemen they would have let him win and the fact that they didn't tells you all you need to know about them b) Ipswich's winner came from a set piece and Colin 'Overheard' Roy Keane saying that set pieces was something Ipswich have been working on. Practicing before a game is a subtle form of cheating and Ipswich should immediately say Sorry and agree that the gentlemenaly thing to do is offer themselves up for immediate relegation Please vote NOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loderingo Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Please vote on which of the following will occur tonight - we can review tomorrow. 1) Palace win, therefore, by definition, no cheating takes place 2) Draw, Ipswich therefore; a) Cheated b) Paid the Ref off c) The Ref is actually Roy Keane's Brother-in-Law d) The Ref added too much extra time/too little extra time (delete as appropriate) 3) Ipswich win in which case a) This is another example of the conspiracy against Palace. Don't Ipswich KNOW how hard it is for Colin? If they were gentlemen they would have let him win and the fact that they didn't tells you all you need to know about them b) Ipswich's winner came from a set piece and Colin 'Overheard' Roy Keane saying that set pieces was something Ipswich have been working on. Practicing before a game is a subtle form of cheating and Ipswich should immediately say Sorry and agree that the gentlemenaly thing to do is offer themselves up for immediate relegation Please vote NOW! 3c - Ipswich win and Warnock blames it all on the fact that we cheated and because of this his players his young team were too demoralised to play well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numbeast Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Please vote on which of the following will occur tonight - we can review tomorrow. 1) Palace win, therefore, by definition, no cheating takes place 2) Draw, Ipswich therefore; a) Cheated b) Paid the Ref off c) The Ref is actually Roy Keane's Brother-in-Law d) The Ref added too much extra time/too little extra time (delete as appropriate) 3) Ipswich win in which case a) This is another example of the conspiracy against Palace. Don't Ipswich KNOW how hard it is for Colin? If they were gentlemen they would have let him win and the fact that they didn't tells you all you need to know about them b) Ipswich's winner came from a set piece and Colin 'Overheard' Roy Keane saying that set pieces was something Ipswich have been working on. Practicing before a game is a subtle form of cheating and Ipswich should immediately say Sorry and agree that the gentlemenaly thing to do is offer themselves up for immediate relegation Please vote NOW! I think you missed out 4 and 5 4) Colin starts shooting his mouth off and Keane lays him out cold 5) Ipswich score 2 and Colin instruct his team to get sent off thereby the games is abandond and he and Jordan speard the conspiricy theory that everyone hates them and the Ref is getting his own back for Mr Shoebridge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View from the Dolman Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 3d) Poor old Palace have a transfer embargo because of us carrot-munching tractor-driving pikeys from way out west. Aaaah, how we feel for you Colin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pederho ll Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Don't you know that Crystal Palace have a transfer embargo, young lads working their socks off......it only fair and reasonable that all teams when playing Palace allow them at least a goal headstart! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southport Red Posted August 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Don't you know that Crystal Palace have a transfer embargo, young lads working their socks off......it only fair and reasonable that all teams when playing Palace allow them at least a goal headstart! THAT'S IT!! We should run the League as a Handicap. If you are not very good you get a goal start, can you imagine? Every Saturday at 2:59 when the day's fixtures first appear on SSN it would say "Bristol Rovers 10" to be followed two hours later of reports that "Bristol Rovers were edged out 11-10 in a thriller at the Mem" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View from the Dolman Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Don't you know that Crystal Palace have a transfer embargo, young lads working their socks off......it only fair and reasonable that all teams when playing Palace allow them at least a goal headstart!You appear to have missed something... Colin's 60 years of age! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest clevedonred Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 You appear to have missed something... Colin's 60 years of age! And don't forget that because it's him everyone thinks it's a laugh. How right you are Colin by the way 2e) didn't put cushions at the back of the goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southport Red Posted August 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 by the way 2e) didn't put cushions at the back of the goal You just reminded me, as part of the media's City Bashing campaign yesterday's Daily Star actually had a comment along the lines of "why do Bristol still have wooden frames in the backs of their nets - didn't they go out with the Ark?" So now the media are having a pop because they don't believe our goal furniture is trendy enough? FFS - better pop down to Habitat for some new Designer Corner Flags before they notice them then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Percy Parrot Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 You just reminded me, as part of the media's City Bashing campaign yesterday's Daily Star actually had a comment along the lines of "why do Bristol still have wooden frames in the backs of their nets - didn't they go out with the Ark?" Good old Daily Star...except the frame is metal and Manchester United have them too...and Arsenal, and Chelsea....and Liverpool. I noticed Palace fans online (and apparently on the radio) as saying the back stanchion was illegal. Funny - because Man Utd have them and referees have been down Ashton Gate for a number of years, seen them and not made any comment about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith_Lemon Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith_Lemon Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 Palace lose, Warnock blames us for cheating again because his players are still down from the goal, also blames West Ham for him being there and if they didnt 'cheat' he would be in the premier league still winning the uefa cup with Sheff U. Blames the referee for added time and also blames us city fans for making the palace fans quiet and sour. Blames the price of the hotdogs and pies down Ashton for his anger towards the referee. Says 'Well you can't blame me for going mad, I'm not paying £4 for a hotdog, you don't even get ketchup, to be fair City should be fair and put ketchup on the hotdog with some onions. Maybe then I would be cool about the judgement of the referee and the linesman' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.