Corleone Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 Worth a start Tuesday? How could we accommodate him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 For who though? Although he is one hell of a frustrating player JET has to play, baldock will get you goals if you give him the chance.. But we don't have ariel ability up front to hold up the ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fka dagest Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 It's a difficult one. I thought he was quite good when he came on. Ultimately either Baldock or JET has to be sacrificed. I feel that Harewood can receive the ball well and link play nicely. Neither of our forwards did that well enough today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chappers Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 Am I the only one who thinks Harewood is a pretty limited lump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fka dagest Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 Am I the only one who thinks Harewood is a pretty limited lump? It's hard to say, but one thing is for sure, he had the best shot on goal of any of our forwards today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Red Rich Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 Am I the only one who thinks Harewood is a pretty limited lump? No, I like to give every new signing the benefit of the doubt but after half an hour vs the gas i described him as cumbersome, I haven't changed my opinion since..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciderbeans Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 Probably would have been effective upfront today if we play the right tactics and passed it on the floor. Putting square pegs in round holes this afternoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiale Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 I have not been impressed by him to be honest - and we know we have goals in this team - so i'd play the same team, but play to our strenghts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bakes Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 Am I the only one who thinks Harewood is a pretty limited lump? in one word no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 I think we are still lacking in something from a strikers, like we are still a player short. We have a lump in Harewood, not sure how many goals are in him but he did look to hold the ball up a bit. We have a nippy striker in Baldock but lumping it to him won't get him into the game. What are our other options, Taylor is injured still (again) isn't he, and he's not full of goals and Wes Burns who is only 18 and unlikely to get picked ahead of the others. I know Jet is chipping in with the goals but he's more of a midfielder than an out and out striker with the freerole he has, eg he takes he free kicks rather than being on the receiving end of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiale Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 We need to play the ball over the defence for Baldock - just like Posh did for their man today - why we lump it to him I have no idea. Worse case scenario is it pegs their defence deep, and pushes their whole team deeper (or they have huge gaps in midfield) either of which would suit us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 I know Jet is chipping in with the goals but he's more of a midfielder than an out and out striker with the freerole he has, eg he takes he free kicks rather than being on the receiving end of them. I do question the wisdom of that. Particularly corners. JET has a powerdriver shot and is quite tall and hefty. Remember that JET corner that fell to Pack only for a tame shot to be easily saved. If Pack had been the corner taker and JET the receiver just ouside the box, we might've seen a rocket hit the back of the net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 I like big Marlon's enthusiasm but I don't think we can accommodate him at present. JET was non existent today but we still need him in the side and can't play him anywhere else than in a free role. Baldock is captain and a goalscorer so will always play. Even though his performance today resembled nothing like that of a captain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcbcfc Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 I think we could play 3 at the back, have Marv as a holding midfielder allowing us to play 2 up front Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pooki Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 I think we could play 3 at the back, have Marv as a holding midfielder allowing us to play 2 up front I like the idea but fear the reality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Balls Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 The only way we can accommodate Baldock, Harewood & JET is to play 3 at the back, 2 in central midfield and 2 wing backs. In other words 3-5-2 or variation of. With the defence we had out there today no chance. With Carey and Shorey in a back 3 maybe, but it's also dependent on Bryan and Wagstaff to play as wingbacks. One can do it, but not sure about the other. I would rather we play the ball on the floor, and show a lot better movement than we did for most of today. Lumping it forward to Baldock is just never going to work, apart from the odd occasion a defender makes a complete howler and let's him through. Of course if it was our defence and goalkeeper, I am sure we would be generous enough to let him have at least one goal...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfOfWestStreet Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 No, I like to give every new signing the benefit of the doubt but after half an hour vs the gas i described him as cumbersome, I haven't changed my opinion since..... Half an hour against a non league team? Give him a break he's not had a chance. Yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myol'man Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 Conehead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Red Rich Posted September 15, 2013 Report Share Posted September 15, 2013 Half an hour against a non league team? Give him a break he's not had a chance. Yet. Cool, when he gets a chance I might change my opinion..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.