MATT BCFC Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 It sounds to me as if Tinnion didnt want to keep Carey. The reason for me thinking this are; - He wasnt aloud to train with the other players cos he hadnt sign a new contract, but nor has Hill but hes training with the team. - Carey claims he didnt sign a new contract because city offered him less money than he was already on. - I also think we could afford to keep Carey but Tinnion just didnt want to keep him Just a thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmersonsKev Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 Tinman wanted him to stay as long as he wanted to play for the football club, Tinman went round to louis's house to try and get him to sign but all louis was going on about was money money money and never once mentioned football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 It sounds to me as if Tinnion didnt want to keep Carey. The reason for me thinking this are; - He wasnt aloud to train with the other players cos he hadnt sign a new contract, but nor has Hill but hes training with the team. - Carey claims he didnt sign a new contract because city offered him less money than he was already on. - I also think we could afford to keep Carey but Tinnion just didnt want to keep him Just a thought ← Nonsense. Read the posts and statements from the club and Carey over the past few weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MATT BCFC Posted July 16, 2004 Author Share Posted July 16, 2004 If we wanted him so bad why did we offer contracts to him that were less than hes already on then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_C Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 listen to the tinman interview on world and you will understand more about rip off agents etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex_mike Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 I hate agents so much they ruin the game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Red Sinjen Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 If we wanted him so bad why did we offer contracts to him that were less than hes already on then? ← I think it has been documented to death that the football club can not and will not afford to continusly reward failure. Even with that said, the contact that was being offered to Louis was in fact more lucrative then the one he was on, if he played the majority if the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 - He wasnt aloud to train with the other players cos he hadnt sign a new contract, but nor has Hill but hes training with the team. ← Hill is still under 24, so if he was to leave for another club then we would command a fee. If Hill doesn't sign a contract, then do we have a better chance of "selling" him if he has not trained with the squad, or if he has trained with the squad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.