Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Port Said Red said:

You can scratch him off now then. :)

Absolutely PSR. Over the moon for him and us.

  • Great Post 1
Posted
Just now, BCFCGav said:

Absolutely PSR. Over the moon for him and us.

He is absolutely buzzing I can assure you. The last 22 months has had more downs than ups and it all plays with your head. 

  • Robin 2
Posted (edited)

Ok, let’s pick the bones out of this. Tanner and Williams are absent following injuries from the weekend, as is McNally due to a concussion. Those three spots are taken up by Morrison, Pring (back from his cut against Cardiff) and BIG ROB! Think I’ve got all that right!

COYR! 🔴⚪
 

 

Injured:

McNally

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

Twine

Benarous

Bell

Edited by BCFCGav
  • Thank You 2
Posted

Just in case anyone was having too much fun! A reminder of what it means to be City. Who did we lose? Sykes, Naismith. Few other hobblers too. How long will Dickie be banned for?

 

 

 

Injured:

McNally

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

Twine

Benarous

Sykes

Bell

  • Thank You 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, BCFCGav said:

Just in case anyone was having too much fun! A reminder of what it means to be City. Who did we lose? Sykes, Naismith. Few other hobblers too. How long will Dickie be banned for?

 

 

 

 

Injured:

McNally

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

Twine

Benarous

Sykes

Bell

One match ban for denying a player a goalscoring opportunity, I believe.

  • Like 1
  • Thank You 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Here is one.

Great though it is to see Dickie, Pring, Roberts and now Atkinson back- they have been brought back in a match-fit and durable manner yes?

Do we have the right medical team if not why don’t lansdowns put hands in pockets and get best private help 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Topper 123 said:

Do we have the right medical team if not why don’t lansdowns put hands in pockets and get best private help 

because thats more expense?

Posted
17 hours ago, redsquirrel said:

because thats more expense?

Fack the expense we are almost in an injury crisis and the cost of putting some weight behind putting that right is trouser change to the lansdowns 

  • Like 3
Posted

If I heard Radio Bristol right both Tanner and Williams will be out for 'months not weeks'.

Not back before the New Year then at a very minimum.

Tanner apparently a knee injury and Williams an Achilles, so not the dreaded hamstring.

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Nogbad the Bad said:

If I heard Radio Bristol right both Tanner and Williams will be out for 'months not weeks'.

Not back before the New Year then at a very minimum.

Tanner apparently a knee injury and Williams an Achilles, so not the dreaded hamstring.

 

The Tanner injury especially is rather damaging because given the McCrorie rolling issues, it basically means we have to imbalance the side- no natural RB. Sykes and Earthy I supoizd but again they are wide midfield, wingback at best and creative midfielder respectively.

That imbalance will help to undo us but we can't just sign 3-4 in each full back position just in case. We know Pring, Roberts and even Naismith in emergencies can go to LB but..it's a big problem.

Posted
1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Coild we recall TGH given a) His versatility and b) Our persistent issues in this position won't probably fix themselves soon.

If he played RB or even RWB Vyner, Earthy and others could be used as intended.

We didn’t play with a LB earlier this season (😉😉😉) we could try playing without a RB this time!

Posted
1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

We didn’t play with a LB earlier this season (😉😉😉) we could try playing without a RB this time!

Ah yes McCrorie at LB? Still I don't see us progressing much beyond midtable with the rolling injuries and especially the periodic lack of balance.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Ah yes McCrorie at LB? Still I don't see us progressing much beyond midtable with the rolling injuries and especially the periodic lack of balance.

No, I was being facetious about Cam Pring’s early season positioning!

  • Like 1
  • Thank You 1
Posted (edited)

Ian reckons we have 12 out..yet includes Murphy on the bench as a possible.

Does anyone have a definitive list?

Definite- Injured

McCrorie, Tanner, Williams, Benarous, Twine, Sykes, Bell

Definite- Suspended

Dickie

Likely- Injured

Naismith

Unclear- Injured

McNally

Who am I missing.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Posted
3 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Ian reckons we have 12 out..yet includes Murphy on the bench as a possible.

Does anyone have a definitive list?

Definite- Injured

McCrorie, Tanner, Williams, Benarous, Twine, Sykes, Bell

Definite- Suspended

Dickie

Likely- Injured

Naismith

Unclear- Injured

McNally

Who am I missing.

IMG_1987.thumb.jpeg.4725273a95bc15a19a6849d9d638ba5f.jpeg

Assumes McNally doesn’t make it.

  • Like 1
  • Thank You 1
Posted

Thanks @Davefevs that makes sense.

Ian has downgraded it to 11 now and given Murphy especially but including Murphy and Nelson in the injured if he is given they (Murphy especially) aren't first team is well that is his choice and perhaps a little bit of spin by him too.

Posted
12 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Thanks @Davefevs that makes sense.

Ian has downgraded it to 11 now and given Murphy especially but including Murphy and Nelson in the injured if he is given they (Murphy especially) aren't first team is well that is his choice and perhaps a little bit of spin by him too.

For me it’s a simple one (might not be for everyone though), Murphy was signed to be part of the first-team set up, we paid £200k(ish) for him, so he’s in my first team list.  That’s how I do it, and I stay consistent with “my rules”.  Been doing injury tables for 3 years now.  Nelson, who hasn’t yet played, was part of the City preseason squad so is on my list.  I only include officially announced injuries with the odd exception of when a mate tells me something, because he “knows”.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter whether Ian is trying to spin the numbers one way or another, 1) it is too many imho and 2) LM still has a number of bona fide first-teamers (see below) to pick from, without needing to rush injuries back or expose academy players who aren’t ready.  So if you’re trying to spin that LM hasn’t got enough players you are being a bit disingenuous if you’re then trying to say the amount of injuries is normal.  

O’Leary Bajic

Vyner Roberts Pring Atkinson (McNally)

Knight Bird McGuane

Earthy Mehmeti Hirakawa

Cornick Wells Armstrong Mayulu

plus

Morrison

plus

Campbell-Slowey Phillips

It lacks some balance at RB, but it’s still 11 starters and 4 subs worth of players.  If McNally is fit, it’s a full compliment of 5 subs.  Nor do you have to use 5 subs either!

I believe the likes of Taylor-Clarke and Backwell are also injured, I think one is muscle the other contact.  I saw Callum Wood in a leg brace the other week also.

  • Thank You 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Davefevs said:

For me it’s a simple one (might not be for everyone though), Murphy was signed to be part of the first-team set up, we paid £200k(ish) for him, so he’s in my first team list.  That’s how I do it, and I stay consistent with “my rules”.  Been doing injury tables for 3 years now.  Nelson, who hasn’t yet played, was part of the City preseason squad so is on my list.  I only include officially announced injuries with the odd exception of when a mate tells me something, because he “knows”.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter whether Ian is trying to spin the numbers one way or another, 1) it is too many imho and 2) LM still has a number of bona fide first-teamers (see below) to pick from, without needing to rush injuries back or expose academy players who aren’t ready.  So if you’re trying to spin that LM hasn’t got enough players you are being a bit disingenuous if you’re then trying to say the amount of injuries is normal.  

O’Leary Bajic

Vyner Roberts Pring Atkinson (McNally)

Knight Bird McGuane

Earthy Mehmeti Hirakawa

Cornick Wells Armstrong Mayulu

plus

Morrison

plus

Campbell-Slowey Phillips

It lacks some balance at RB, but it’s still 11 starters and 4 subs worth of players.  If McNally is fit, it’s a full compliment of 5 subs.  Nor do you have to use 5 subs either!

I believe the likes of Taylor-Clarke and Backwell are also injured, I think one is muscle the other contact.  I saw Callum Wood in a leg brace the other week also.

Any ideas of any of them being available for our next game after the break ( Burnley at home I believe ) 

Posted (edited)

Good debate and discussion all. I long for the season we’ve not so much to talk about though!

Here’s what we glean from todays lineup:

Sykes’ and Naismith’s injuries from Tuesday means today comes too soon, we’ll await to hear more on both. Dickie is suspended. Those three are replaced in the squad by fit-again Luke McNally, and youngsters Campbell-Slowey and Phillips.

Place your bets on which two players we lose today…! COYFR 🔴⚪


 

Injured:

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

Twine

Benarous

Sykes

Bell

Edited by BCFCGav
  • Thank You 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, redkev said:

Any ideas of any of them being available for our next game after the break ( Burnley at home I believe ) 

LM mentioned Twine hoping to be back in training next week, and maybe in contention for Burnley.  But he caveated with "assumes he comes through the step up in training".

Posted

Crisis? What crisis?! 😅

Phenomenal performance and win. Really over the moon with that. And, as always, not a bad time for an international break! Not sure who’s close to a return but this two weeks will surely help. You reds 🔴⚪

 

 

Injured:

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

Twine

Benarous

Sykes

Bell

Posted
On 07/11/2024 at 23:36, Nogbad the Bad said:

If I heard Radio Bristol right both Tanner and Williams will be out for 'months not weeks'.

Not back before the New Year then at a very minimum.

Tanner apparently a knee injury and Williams an Achilles, so not the dreaded hamstring.

 

G'day Nogbad, according to "Fotmob" Tanner knee late December, Williams Achilles mid January, Sykes Hamstring early December :thumbsup:.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Davefevs said:

LM mentioned Twine hoping to be back in training next week, and maybe in contention for Burnley.  But he caveated with "assumes he comes through the step up in training".

G'day Fevs,again according to Fotmob, Twine late November, McCrorie late November, Bell late November.

So 🤞 we possibly may see them soon after the break :thumbsup:

Posted

I would be interested to know how are numbers of injured compares with other sides in the division.  Only then can we point the finger at the medical staff.

 

Anyone got the stats?

Posted
15 hours ago, Ivorguy said:

I would be interested to know how are numbers of injured compares with other sides in the division.  Only then can we point the finger at the medical staff.

 

Anyone got the stats?

I think, I think Norwich may have one or two out. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Jose said:

I think, I think Norwich may have one or two out. 

Their fans were whinging about yesterday on their forum. Obviously no idea that we had Twine, McCorrie, Twine, Tanner, Williams all injured with one of our top CBs suspended.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Robbored said:

Their fans were whinging about yesterday on their forum. Obviously no idea that we had Twine, McCorrie, Twine, Tanner, Williams all injured with one of our top CBs suspended.

Not forgetting Sykes, Bell & Naismith.

  • Thank You 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Ivorguy said:

I would be interested to know how are numbers of injured compares with other sides in the division.  

While the stats may show some other teams may have a similar number of players unavailable at any given time, we permanently have a number out with medium or long term injuries.

Certainly when a City player is about to be subbed through injury it now seems inevitable bad news will quickly follow that the injury will see him missing for a prolonged period - we don't seem to get 'knocks' any more with players only missing a game or 2.

We are never injury free or even close to it, the moment a couple of long term absentees are ready to make a long awaited return to the match day squad it seems almost certain 2 or 3 others will take their place on the long term absentee list in double quick time.

50 years ago we wouldn't have believed the amount of medium and long term injuries we've continually suffered for at least 5 years now, and if we'd had anything like this amount in those days we certainly wouldn't have been promoted to the top league.

  • Like 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, Nogbad the Bad said:

While the stats may show some other teams may have a similar number of players unavailable at any given time, we permanently have a number out with medium or long term injuries.

Certainly when a City player is about to be subbed through injury it now seems inevitable bad news will quickly follow that the injury will see him missing for a prolonged period - we don't seem to get 'knocks' any more with players only missing a game or 2.

We are never injury free or even close to it, the moment a couple of long term absentees are ready to make a long awaited return to the match day squad it seems almost certain 2 or 3 others will take their place on the long term absentee list in double quick time.

50 years ago we wouldn't have believed the amount of medium and long term injuries we've continually suffered for at least 5 years now, and if we'd had anything like this amount in those days we certainly wouldn't have been promoted to the top league.

I guess that’s the difference between “knocks” (contact injuries) - look how quickly Pring came back, and muscle injuries - strains, ruptures rather than tightening / tweaks.

Posted
10 hours ago, Davefevs said:

I guess that’s the difference between “knocks” (contact injuries) - look how quickly Pring came back, and muscle injuries - strains, ruptures rather than tightening / tweaks.

Still a calendar month and 4 games out for Pring but we're so used to expecting injuries to be serious, long standing, and torturously slow to finally overcome that we now view 'only' a month out as 'coming back quickly'!

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Nogbad the Bad said:

Still a calendar month and 4 games out for Pring but we're so used to expecting injuries to be serious, long standing, and torturously slow to finally overcome that we now view 'only' a month out as 'coming back quickly'!

 

For that injury I think it is.  A lot of “skin and guts” to heal! 🤢 

  • Like 1
  • Admin
Posted
43 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

For that injury I think it is.  A lot of “skin and guts” to heal! 🤢 

His injury looked like my leg did after a biopsy, it was weeks before the sutures were removed and even then I had lots of restrictions for a number of weeks, goodness knows how he is playing professional sport so quickly

  • Like 1
Posted
On 08/11/2024 at 22:21, Mr Popodopolous said:

Thanks @Davefevs that makes sense.

Ian has downgraded it to 11 now and given Murphy especially but including Murphy and Nelson in the injured if he is given they (Murphy especially) aren't first team is well that is his choice and perhaps a little bit of spin by him too.

I think Nelson suffered an eye injury but having checked on line it appears it's his right arm as well. Seems quite serious.

  • Funny 2
Posted

Whilst the likes of Burnley, Norwich, Hull and Sunderland have signicant levels of injuries to ourselves, the average is between 5-7. Millwall have the least at just two. The vast majority are muscle injuries of various descriptions, which can be attributed to the demands and intensity of the modern game. However we seem to have had a high volume over several seasons with different regimes, which doesn't indicate that any one medical team have been incompetent.  I can't see that conditioning of players is likely to be that variable between clubs because they will all have similar access to data and technology. Training methods may vary between different clubs and coaches, but again given our different regimes that doesn't indicate that being the problem. I know that there has been speculation that our pitches are quite hard, but I would assume that the surfaces are fairly common across the championship. Therefore, it is difficult to pinpoint the causation and whilst I don't have the historical data, we do appear to have more frequent peaks in comparison with other clubs. Maybe we are not the most boring club in the championship, but the unluckiest. Remember we didn't any penalties for what seemed forever!

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, redsquirrel said:

how many r mccrories are there in the scotland squad? theres one one the bench tonight according to bbc

Brother of Ross, Robbie, played in the Rangers academy together. Robbie is a keeper.

  • Thank You 2
Posted

Dickie returns from suspension and Twine returns from injury, two good players to have back in the fold! Youngsters Campbell-Slowey and Phillips make way. I’m nervous for this one!

COYR 🔴⚪
 

 

 

 

Injured:

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

Benarous

Sykes

Bell

Posted

Bit of a sickener! Just couldn’t covert today. All our boys seemed to come through ok, the same can’t be said for Burnley who had a record 381 injuries needing treatment in the second-half.


 

 

Injured:

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

Benarous

Sykes

Bell

 

Posted

Missed this fellas, just posted re Atkinson on the new Bell thread. I’m all for the Atkinson caution, especially with Zak, other Rob and Luke fit and firing. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Assume JCS travelling instead?  Mix n match.

Hearing Billy Phillips heading back to Bath City on loan too.

Might’ve misheard. Oops.

Posted

Campbell-Slowey comes in for Atkinson who banked some minutes for the unders last night, and is fine! No other changes from the Saturday MD20.

UTC 🔴⚪

 

 

Injured:

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

Benarous

Sykes

Bell

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

@BCFCGav in my xls, Bell is no longer classed as injured, as he played last night.  But that’s just my method.

Yea he’s in that fit-not-match-fit category at the mo. But great news he’s fixed and playing. 

Edited by BCFCGav
  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BCFCGav said:

Yea he’s in that fit-not-match-fit category at the mo. But great news he’s fixed and playing. 

I did start to use a similar category last season…but club updates are unreliable at times.

Posted

Atkinson and Bell are both back on the bench after Rob’s absence on Tuesday to instead get minutes for the unders, and Sam’s recent injury.

McGuane (injury) and Josh-Campbell Slowey (rotation) make way.

McGuane been excellent of late so the injury was due!

COYR. These are there for the taking. 🔴⚪
 

 

 

 

Injured:

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

McGuane

Benarous

Sykes

Posted

And take them we did! Absolute demolition job, love to see it 🔴⚪

No new knocks, either.

Right back and central midfield both suffering from injury clusters. A week before our next match, let’s hope for good news come next Saturday!

 

Injured:

Naismith

McCrorie

Tanner

Williams

McGuane

Benarous

Sykes

Posted

GW18 over, only 1 more GW (GW19) before the 5 yellow card suspension moves to 10 yellow cards, and nobody at risk of a 5th yellow.  Only a red card (or two yellows) can lead to a suspension.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...