Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Benneythered said:

Seems mad to me to be trialing this in the semi final of a cup thats already underway, asking for trouble.

I don't think it's right having rules or decisions in one game that may not apply in another , that said ....

8 minutes ago, Never to the dark side said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c3e32e0dx1go

ITV have the games on 7th January as well as 6th February,be an interesting watch.

It worked well in Rugby when I seen it , anything that makes decisions clearer has to be good. Unless it slows the game down even more.

Posted

Just heard it for the first time in the Spurs Vs Liverpool game. 

I’m no fan of VAR but hearing the ref real time over the tannoy did seem to give it more credibility. 

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, One Team said:

Just heard it for the first time in the Spurs Vs Liverpool game. 

I’m no fan of VAR but hearing the ref real time over the tannoy did seem to give it more credibility. 

Don’t see the point. People can see on the screen it’s offside. I don’t need someone to tell me. 

Posted
Just now, Maltshoveller said:

Forget VAR

Lets here what the ref has to say about that!!

Should have sent the player off  30 seconds later he scores

Yep, totally bottled it

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jose said:

Don’t see the point. People can see on the screen it’s offside. I don’t need someone to tell me. 

It was an obvious decision too.

Fans will want communication when there is a more controversial incident .

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Jose said:

Don’t see the point. People can see on the screen it’s offside. I don’t need someone to tell me. 

That not necessarily so.. VaR decisions can and often do lake an age when it’s a close call and not always clear what decision VaR make and having the referee explain is a positive move.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Maltshoveller said:

Forget VAR

Lets here what the ref has to say about that!!

Should have sent the player off  30 seconds later he scores

It's like when they start by looking at offside then they look at handball then they turn down a goal for a 'foul' at the other end of the pitch! 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Robbored said:

That not necessarily so.. VaR decisions can and often do lake an age when it’s a close call and not always clear what decision VaR make and having the referee explain is a positive move.

That incident between Liverpool and Spurs last season when Liverpool were denied an onside goal. Would have been interesting to hear the referee's opinion then after he'd listened to VAR!

Posted
22 minutes ago, Super said:

Tbh I wouldn't mind seeing a Spurs v Newcastle final. Long way to go I know.

Yes make a difference!

 

18 minutes ago, Midred said:

That incident between Liverpool and Spurs last season when Liverpool were denied an onside goal. Would have been interesting to hear the referee's opinion then after he'd listened to VAR!

Would they say someone dived in their view ?

That could stir up a storm !

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Maltshoveller said:

Forget VAR

Lets here what the ref has to say about that!!

Should have sent the player off  30 seconds later he scores

Just a matter of his opinion in this case the ref thought only one booking, another day it would be two ..I think by a fine margin he made the right call...

  • Like 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, Midred said:

That incident between Liverpool and Spurs last season when Liverpool were denied an onside goal. Would have been interesting to hear the referee's opinion then after he'd listened to VAR!

I don’t remember that particular incident but the referee is guided by VaR who now can announce their decision.

However - what will happen when the ref is told by VaR to review the incident on the pitch side screen? Will he then be announcing his decision?……….:dunno:

 

.

Posted
12 hours ago, Maltshoveller said:

Forget VAR

Lets here what the ref has to say about that!!

Should have sent the player off  30 seconds later he scores

I noticed that Ange didn't come out with the "If everything is equal and fair and balanced " statement that he did after losing to Newcastle! 😅

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, exAtyeoMax said:

The whole concept sounds horrific. Luckily we're not in it so I don't have to experience it.

What fans really want is to hear the whole conversation in real time like in other sports.

 But that seems unlikely.

I did think it seemed to take a while for the ref to make his announcement which was pretty obvious in this case but maybe that is due to the communication taking time to get through.

Mind you won’t mean people agree or accept the decision made .

 

 

 

 

Edited by Markthehorn
Posted
14 minutes ago, Markthehorn said:

What fans really want is to hear the whole conversation in real time like in other sports.

 But that seems unlikely.

I did think it seemed to take a while for the ref to make his announcement which was pretty obvious in this case but maybe that is due to the communication taking time to get through.

Mind you won’t mean people agree or accept the decision made .

 

 

 

 

I don't want to hear any of it. I've lived with being perplexed by an official's decision for over 50 years, I don't need or want to hear it now. Especially during a game!

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, exAtyeoMax said:

I don't want to hear any of it. I've lived with being perplexed by an official's decision for over 50 years, I don't need or want to hear it now. Especially during a game!

Fair point and guess it doesn’t make any difference to the decision as isn’t going to change .

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Just another step towards post-match Sky interviews with Referee's. Previously there was never any comment on the performance of referees or decisions, then the PGMOL started responding occasionally, then Howard Webb started doing his weekly reviews of refereeing decisions, and now we are having referee's explain themselves in the stadium. The ban on refs speaking to the media is now almost impossible to justify. 

Edited by 38MC
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Midred said:

Imagine them having to explain some of the decisions over the weekend!

,,

They would just say I thought it was x in my opinion wouldn’t they ?

Not much more really .

Afterall would be subjective which I think a lot of people didn’t realise VAR would be .

On 09/01/2025 at 13:53, 38MC said:

Just another step towards post-match Sky interviews with Referee's. Previously there was never any comment on the performance of referees or decisions, then the PGMOL started responding occasionally, then Howard Webb started doing his weekly reviews of refereeing decisions, and now we are having referee's explain themselves in the stadium. The ban on refs speaking to the media is now almost impossible to justify. 

 

Posted
On 08/01/2025 at 21:53, One Team said:

Just heard it for the first time in the Spurs Vs Liverpool game. 

I’m no fan of VAR but hearing the ref real time over the tannoy did seem to give it more credibility. 

Yeah weather we for against. Get a feeling it coming any way. So let's see all VAR for rest of season with refs real time and let's see these var deductions justified in real time 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...