Frank Reynolds Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Maybe thats where GJ is planning to play him from now on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ronmeister Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 I don't see why, a central midfield of Wilkshire and Noble sounds great from where i'm standing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Reynolds Posted November 23, 2005 Author Share Posted November 23, 2005 A midfield of:Wilkshire Russell Brown Golbournemakes me go all funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 A midfield of:Wilkshire Russell Brown Golbournemakes me go all funny.A midfield capable of holding up the ball, passing smoothly & supplying quality balls to the strikers makes me go all funny! (That & blu-tack!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 DW signed LW to replace Murray and play on the right, kidded himself and tried to kid us that LW was a right winger for 21 games, then dropped him-He isn't because he hasn't got the pace.Neither is he a left winger although, I'll admit he had some success there under Tins, cutting in on his stronger right foot-AT HOME.Away was a different stort and Tins finished up dropping him.One day and I hope that day comes soon, managers of this club will realise that we have got two attacking players who can play wide, averagely well-Murray & Cotterill-That's it.I wouldn't mind seeing Golbourne have a go wide left, but we'd need a far stronger central midfield and a passer to give him the ball-Let's hope that's Russell, Noble or both!All the othe midfielders are CENTRAL midfielders and if we ain't going to play them in that position.Transfer them and get replacements who can play there.Lack of pace & width on the left and a run through, non tackling, out of position, far to square and lightweight, central midfield are two major reasons behind us being in the bottom two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazareth Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 If we get Savage then it will be a permanent move, not a loan, as he is unattached. Unfortunately the small print of the league rules does not allow him to sign for us properly until the transfer window, but apparently they are questioning the legality of it. I think I'm right in saying that we can sign Savage and still have our 1 loan left over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.