Guest ashtonyate Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 I seems that when the Rovers Stadium goes a head Bristol Rugby will play a lot of their game's at the gate this will make the surface become a poor reflection on what it is today. I for one sooner have the Gas at Ashton than the rugby.If and at the moment seems likely we go up poor surface is the last thing we need. I AM STARTING TO BELIVE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezgimed Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 I seems that when the Rovers Stadium goes a head Bristol Rugby will play a lot of their game's at the gate this will make the surface become a poor reflection on what it is today. I for one sooner have the Gas at Ashton than the rugby.If and at the moment seems likely we go up poor surface is the last thing we need. I AM STARTING TO BELIVEQuite right.If the Gas play at AG the grass wont see much of the ball... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BCFC Matthaus Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 I don't agree with having the gas playing at the gate - rugby club preferably!I do agree that it would be easier on the pitch to have the gas though - the ball will hardly touch the ground - WHOOOOSH!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 as said elsewhere in it's current condition the pitch couldn't handle football and rugby, however if Bristol rugby are willing to spend the required cash for the better pitch that can handle it, then I have no problem with it, alot more money can be brought into the club with the rugby, besides Reading, Hull, Wycombe among others have no problems with their pitches and nothing is really wrong with QPR, Watford however haven't spent the cash and it's a mess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ashtonyate Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 as said elsewhere in it's current condition the pitch couldn't handle football and rugby, however if Bristol rugby are willing to spend the required cash for the better pitch that can handle it, then I have no problem with it, alot more money can be brought into the club with the rugby, besides Reading, Hull, Wycombe among others have no problems with their pitches and nothing is really wrong with QPR, Watford however haven't spent the cash and it's a messWatford had to cancel their game a few weeks ago after the rugby it was like a paddy field if we get another wet winter the ground will suffer what ever they do, we can't take that chance with the playing surface Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 Watford had to cancel their game a few weeks ago after the rugby it was like a paddy field if we get another wet winter the ground will suffer what ever they do, we can't take that chance with the playing surfacewhich is what I just said, if you don't spend the money on the pitch problems happen, however if the money is spent (which will have to be paid for by the rugby club) then rugby at the gate won't be a problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest citynut54 Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 I agree with GJ. Lets keep the Gate for City only !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badger22 Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Thats a load of rubbish!! Wycombe, Reading and watford have rugby on the pitch and they have a great surface.If you spend money on the pitch before they come then it really wont be a problem.It will mean extra money in the pot, better profile for the gate, and a better profile for the City.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loderingo Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Thats a load of rubbish!! Wycombe, Reading and watford have rugby on the pitch and they have a great surface.If you spend money on the pitch before they come then it really wont be a problem.It will mean extra money in the pot, better profile for the gate, and a better profile for the City....Went to the Majdeski a few weeks back and the pitch looked pretty good considering. I wouldn't mind at all if as BH said we get the right pitch in. Think of what we could do with the extra income - buy new players, freeze ticket prices etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masta Z Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 The rugby played at the Mem on Friday night and it definately affected the way we (Rovers) played yesterday. It was impossible to play a fluent passing game to create chances. It resulted in boring long ball football and in the end a 0-0 draw.I'm not really bothered where we end up but for your sake, hope its Rovers and not Bristol Rugby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest snowy_RDFC Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 The shareholders would sooner have the rugby because they'll draw bigger crowds than Rovers on a consistent basis - more games that will have bumper crowds: Bath, Gloucester, Leicester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webzcas Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 If we have the Rugby Club hacking up our pitch every other week, then they should make up the shortfall in the catering contract so we can get the East End redeveloped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh red Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 The rugby played at the Mem on Friday night and it definately affected the way we (Rovers) played yesterday. It was impossible to play a fluent passing game to create chances. It resulted in boring long ball football and in the end a 0-0 draw.I'm not really bothered where we end up but for your sake, hope its Rovers and not Bristol Rugby.that's the problem though, Rovers don't invest in their pitch to make sure it is able to handle both sports, how is it that Wycombe can host Rugby and yet still have one of the best pitches in the whole Football League, you only get out of a pitch what you are willing to put in, if Geoff Dunford put the required investment into the pitch then it wouldn't have a problem handling both sports, however that is a man who just cares about his ego and not about either club being succesful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest citynut54 Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 The rugby played at the Mem on Friday night and it definately affected the way we (Rovers) played yesterday. It was impossible to play a fluent passing game to create chances. It resulted in boring long ball football and in the end a 0-0 draw.I'm not really bothered where we end up but for your sake, hope its Rovers and not Bristol Rugby.No change there then !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilksy Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 I'd rather have Rovers down at the gate, even if the Rugby will bring bigger crowds.A few of you have said the Madejski Stadiums pitch is okay, but its been terrible for the last few weeks, and they have spent loads on getting a decent surface that should cope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanC Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 which is what I just said, if you don't spend the money on the pitch problems happen, however if the money is spent (which will have to be paid for by the rugby club) then rugby at the gate won't be a problem?As the rugby club are now only tenants at the minimal ground the rovers are forcing them to move from there home so they can carry out this work so in theory Rovers should have to pay for a pitch for us that will handle both football and rugby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redtucks Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 The rugby played at the Mem affected the way we (Rovers) played. It was impossible to play a fluent passing game to create chances. It resulted in boring long ball football.....Don't blame the rugby!!!You played the same at Eastville and at Trumpton!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mesa boogie Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 The problem at the Mem stems from the fact there is a natural stream running under the pitch leaving the pitch always wet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 The problem at the Mem stems from the fact there is a natural stream running under the pitch leaving the pitch always wet.Is that a stream of piss coming from the terraces? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolman Block B Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Is that a stream of piss coming from the terraces? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mre Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 rovers can sod off there not playing at the gate, sure there is a spare pitch at the downs i know there is no stands but that don't matter only a handfull of gas heads go to the momorial ground.Bristol rugby can play at the gate as many times as they want fantastic atmosphere last time they played bath there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Bristol rugby can play at the gate as many times as they want fantastic atmosphere last time they played bath thereyou got to be joking! the pitch has been a mess ever sincedid anyone see the rovers highlights from the weekend? the pitch was an absolute state. the game was almost called off because of the condition it was in caused by the rugby. this is the last thing we want at the gate.not to mention the mess it looks when it has the rugby markings lefft all over it.both bristol rugby and bristol rovers can find somewhere else! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redcityman Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 If we are promoted this season then our home form is going to be crucial in survival in the championship, anything that may have a detremental effect on the surface will surely hamper our home form, you only have to look at the gas for proof, how many successful seasons have they had whilst sharing with the egg chasers?Only way the egg chasers to be allowed to grace our hallowed turf if is they pay for a specialist surface to be installed, no pay no play, as for the gas the downs have plenty of pitches,never allow them to share the gate, we don't need cuckoos or sqatters..It's our home, let's keep it our homeNo squatters no gas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippycar Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 I'm with Wilksy here.Anyone who saw the Madejski pitch in MOTD on Saturday would have seen the appalling state it was in.With the expected milder and wetter winters, even the best purpose made pitches can stand up to both football and rugby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 I'm with Wilksy here.Anyone who saw the Madejski pitch in MOTD on Saturday would have seen the appalling state it was in.With the expected milder and wetter winters, even the best purpose made pitches can stand up to both football and rugbyA chap I work with is a regular at the Mem. Whilst he knows that the revenue is useful from the Rugby Club, he did mention that the state of the pitch on Saturday was less than satisfactory due to the rugby the previous evening & that it can effect the game.Rock.....................................Hardplace? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest paulie Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 steve philips on radio bristol this morningwas saying that lots of effert had gone into getting the pitch ready for there game saturday butit was a mudbath and it hamperd their play [good excuse]i don't think thet even if alot of cash was spent on our pitch,it could put up with that week in week out ,wouldent want to risk it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Horsman Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Ideally we would have neither. revenue is obviously important, but our style of football does require a decent playing surface and neither the additional use of Rovers own strange interpretation of the game or the invariable churning that the rugby boys would cause would benefit our game.Better use of the facilities during the close season would help, and better use of the in-house facilities too, but sharing has to be the last resort.(top band) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest South Coast Red Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 I seems that when the Rovers Stadium goes a head Bristol Rugby will play a lot of their game's at the gate this will make the surface become a poor reflection on what it is today. I for one sooner have the Gas at Ashton than the rugby.If and at the moment seems likely we go up poor surface is the last thing we need. I AM STARTING TO BELIVEWash your mouth out with soap & water Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BCFC Matthaus Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Deport the Gas back to Twerton Park Bath (Trumpton) where they belong. Still too good for 'em. Send the gas back to Ikea where they belong! They can have a kick about in the car park and perhaps use shelving units as goal posts - thats probably the type of facilities their level of football warrants. Although I doubt your average gashead could put together a piece of self assembly furniture - you have to be able to read for a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mesa boogie Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 Is that a stream of piss coming from the terraces?No that's Dr F's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aller g Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 The rugby have been quoted £750,000 for a new pitch to be put in at AG, if they are to move down there next season.Its grass with artificial grass between.And has been used at various other grounds.Its been proved that constant rugby and football use on these pitches doesnt dig it up etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.