Meh Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 combine all the endless threads backing Gary Johnson and then combine all the threads questioning Gary Johnson. I appreciate this will only leave about 5 new threads this week, but, hey, it won't half do wonders for the endless repetetiveness of this forum over the last few days. Thanks in advance and good luck in this impossible quest for originality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Maesknoll Red Posted April 22, 2008 Admin Share Posted April 22, 2008 combine all the endless threads backing Gary Johnson and then combine all the threads questioning Gary Johnson. I appreciate this will only leave about 5 new threads this week, but, hey, it won't half do wonders for the endless repetetiveness of this forum over the last few days. Thanks in advance and good luck in this impossible quest for originality. And there was me thinking the forum had become a platform for topics repeated ad nauseum, for the last couple of years......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Would be nice. But I guess that some fans are only too delighted that City have had such a good season where the club has been up near the top throughout and regardless of how it finishes will see this season as a success. Some fans on the other hand are disapointed that having done so well untill the last few games it now looks as if City have blown automatic and are clinging onto a pray-offs spot. Its these fans that look for scapegoats and quite naturally its the manager and the players who are taking the stick. I guess its easy to see both points of view. Footballs an emotional game and soon after a match is probably not the most appropriate time to post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edson Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Would be nice. But I guess that some fans are only too delighted that City have had such a good season where the club has been up near the top throughout and regardless of how it finishes will see this season as a success. Some fans on the other hand are disapointed that having done so well untill the last few games it now looks as if City have blown automatic and are clinging onto a pray-offs spot. Its these fans that look for scapegoats and quite naturally its the manager and the players who are taking the stick. I guess its easy to see both points of view. Footballs an emotional game and soon after a match is probably not the most appropriate time to post Erm... I hold both points of view simultaneously. I'm off for a row with myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Footballs an emotional game and soon after a match is probably not the most appropriate time to post now you tell us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC_Dan Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Narrowing it down to only two points of view is part of the problem anyway. It seems that for a lot of people on here you're "either for us or against us" and there really is no middle ground for those who are delighted with the progress made but have concerns over certain areas or ideas for how things could have been done differently. On balance though, I think it's fair to say that Gary and the players have tough jobs and that they're probably doing a better job at them than any of us could, otherwise it'd be one of us doing the job instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 combine all the endless threads backing Gary Johnson and then combine all the threads questioning Gary Johnson. I appreciate this will only leave about 5 new threads this week, but, hey, it won't half do wonders for the endless repetetiveness of this forum over the last few days. Thanks in advance and good luck in this impossible quest for originality. I think you are out just for some publicity yourself; if not you could of p.m`d the mods without posting another thread As you can see by my very low post count I am not one of those who constantly post boggotts haphazardly. I have much more important things to do Beauty is in the eye of the beholder as are forum threads so there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meh Posted April 22, 2008 Author Share Posted April 22, 2008 I think you are out just for some publicity yourself; if not you could of p.m`d the mods without posting another thread I posted a thread in the tongue-in-cheek hope that some people may accept the fact that we don't need 100 threads saying the same thing when we could have a few. People keep making what they see as valid points, which is fair enough, but surely if somebody has already said the same thing on the previous 5 threads, maybe it doesn't need saying yet again? It reminds me of the days of my old scratched 45's; they didn't move on either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leveller Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 I think you are out just for some publicity yourself; if not you could of p.m`d the mods without posting another thread As you can see by my very low post count I am not one of those who constantly post boggotts haphazardly. I have much more important things to do Beauty is in the eye of the beholder as are forum threads so there Now you're here can you explain what a boggott is? Genuinely baffled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robins72 Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 I posted a thread in the tongue-in-cheek hope that some people may accept the fact that we don't need 100 threads saying the same thing when we could have a few. People keep making what they see as valid points, which is fair enough, but surely if somebody has already said the same thing on the previous 5 threads, maybe it doesn't need saying yet again? It reminds me of the days of my old scratched 45's; they didn't move on either. 45s what were they? I remember 78s... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmabbuttshair Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 I posted a thread in the tongue-in-cheek hope that some people may accept the fact that we don't need 100 threads saying the same thing when we could have a few. People keep making what they see as valid points, which is fair enough, but surely if somebody has already said the same thing on the previous 5 threads, maybe it doesn't need saying yet again? It reminds me of the days of my old scratched 45's; they didn't move on either. Stop causing trouble Neo you old...Oh wait can't say that here, you know where that was going Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Now you're here can you explain what a boggott is? Genuinely baffled. Most males have two and they aint eyes,arms or legs; don't know where its come from though, maybe me mum or missus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFiGO!?! Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Stop causing trouble Neo you old...Oh wait can't say that here, you know where that was going Hey, he's only questioning the backing of the backing of the questioning and the questioning of the backing of otib's masses to continually and coincidly question the backing, back the questioning, back the backing and question the questioning of Gary Johnson's merits as BCFC manager...... personally I back his questioning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robins72 Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Hey, he's only questioning the backing of the backing of the questioning and the questioning of the backing of otib's masses to continually and coincidly question the backing, back the questioning, back the backing and question the questioning of Gary Johnson's merits as BCFC manager...... personally I back his questioning. but which question are you backing?? :noexpression: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFiGO!?! Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 but which question are you backing?? :noexpression: You've gone and confused me now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cider head Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 oi neo, do you mind posting this in forum help! get back to ziderheads and do some work :tongue: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmabbuttshair Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Hey, he's only questioning the backing of the backing of the questioning and the questioning of the backing of otib's masses to continually and coincidly question the backing, back the questioning, back the backing and question the questioning of Gary Johnson's merits as BCFC manager...... personally I back his questioning. Do you back his backing of the question of the varying degrees of backing though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robins72 Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Do you back his backing of the question of the varying degrees of backing though? but at what degree are we talking about?? The temperature has been rising in here for the past few weeks but could go cold within a week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cider head Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Do you back his backing of the question of the varying degrees of backing though? I think Thee's Got'n Where Thee Cassn't Back'n, Hassn't? :noexpression: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 I posted a thread in the tongue-in-cheek hope that some people may accept the fact that we don't need 100 threads saying the same thing when we could have a few. People keep making what they see as valid points, which is fair enough, but surely if somebody has already said the same thing on the previous 5 threads, maybe it doesn't need saying yet again? It reminds me of the days of my old scratched 45's; they didn't move on either. Yeah I know; I didnt come up on the down train. I`ve got both paddles in the water; but I am still looking for a box of short circuits and a wigwam for a woof woof. We aint all the same each to his/her own, let it go, go with the flow; not everyone is as wise or as stupid as us. Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmabbuttshair Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 I think Thee's Got'n Where Thee Cassn't Back'n, Hassn't? :noexpression: I think thist bist rite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFiGO!?! Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 I think thist bist rite I vend veux magree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogbad the Bad Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 but which question are you backing?? :noexpression: I think he's backin' the USSR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderJar Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Charlie Magree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DOLMANDAN Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Erm... I hold both points of view simultaneously. I'm off for a row with myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chivs Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 Erm... I hold both points of view simultaneously. I'm off for a row with myself. No need Edson. I too hold both views simultaneously. If we coordinate ourselves we could have some blazing rows and then make up for the final pint.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edson Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 No need Edson. I too hold both views simultaneously. If we coordinate ourselves we could have some blazing rows and then make up for the final pint.... The only trouble is, whilst holding the second view, I'm not looking for a scapegoat, because my first view negates the need to find one. I blame myself for being happy with the season but disappointed with recent results. Oh, I just found a scapegoat - me. Call off the search party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 And there was me thinking the forum had become a platform for topics repeated ad nauseum, for the last couple of years......... I don't know about that. I can't remember seeing any recent posts on the Marcus Stewart vs Gary Johnson power struggle sub forum, and there have bene a distinct lack of posts recently moaning about not being able to get tickets for the division 1 play off final at the Mill Stad. Come to think of it, there haven't been many posts complaining that the lack of a striker might cost us promotion to the championship, and also not many recent posts debating whether or not Tins getting us to 7th spot in league 1 was a good first season following the sacked Danny Wilson getting us to the league 1 play off final. That's reminded me, that i don't remember seeing many posts about Tins future following the 7-1 defeat at Swansea in league 1. Now I'm on a roll, where have all the posts gone about our chances at Oldham, Carlisle, Forest, Gillingham, Millwall, Cheltenham, Bradford and Bournmouth? Am I happy that posts debating whether just missing promotion to the prem in our first season back in the championship is success or failure, are repeated ad nauseum? Compared with the posts mentioned above, you bet I am! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted April 23, 2008 Share Posted April 23, 2008 Neo for Despot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meh Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 Neo for Despot! Agreed. I have absolute power. Rule, I must. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Neo - ahhhhhhh - saviour of the universe Neo - ahhhhhhh - he'll save ev'ry one of us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dollymarie Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Neo - ahhhhhhh - saviour of the universe Neo - ahhhhhhh - he'll save ev'ry one of us Neo! We only have 5 minutes to save earth!!! Neo - ahhhhhhh - saviour of the universe...... (repeat to fade) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTone Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Neo! We only have 5 minutes to save earth!!! Full story on BBC's 6pm news Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meh Posted April 24, 2008 Author Share Posted April 24, 2008 Please this gotta stop. After all, i'm only a man, albeit, with a mans courage. Saying that, I never fail. And I eat war rockets for breakfast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Please this gotta stop. After all, i'm only a man, albeit, with a mans courage. Saying that, I never fail. And I eat war rockets for breakfast. No flies on you pal is there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Please this gotta stop. After all, i'm only a man, albeit, with a mans courage. But your the king of the impossible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Agreed. I have absolute power. Rule, I must. Filled with the dark side you are. Help you must seek. mmmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meh Posted April 24, 2008 Author Share Posted April 24, 2008 Filled with the dark side you are. Help you must seek. mmmmmm help I have. The wookies, my friends they are. guide me they will. Bored I am. Shower I need. Smeggen there is. Laters my young padawan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.