Jump to content

Davefevs

OTIB Supporter
  • Posts

    38,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    322

Davefevs last won the day on October 18

Davefevs had the most liked content!

7 Followers

About Davefevs

  • Birthday June 3

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Downend

Recent Profile Visitors

37,826 profile views

Davefevs's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Very Popular
  • First Post

Recent Badges

46.1k

Reputation

  1. I’m sure that is part of it Fuber. I have no probs with a back 3 (loved playing in one myself at Brislington)…I just don’t like the way we play it. I’ve never seen such lack of marking. Defeats the object of it imho. I wonder whether concussion protocol will mean Baker is out next week anyway. Back 4, Pring at LB…for starters.
  2. Not listened to any interviews, first post I’ve really got to tonight, been out watching the Bristol Flyers lose 81-82 to Surrey, which rounded off my sporting Saturday “nicely”….not. My summary: For some reason or another we’ve gone away from the basics of early season., where we looked well drilled, committed, etc, without looking hugely cohesive, but it was enough to get results. I liked that we stuck with 442/4411, changing personnel to suit, e.g. Cardiff where we went Baker at LB, rather than go back 3 to accommodate him. We looked flexible within a framework. I felt encouraged. I hate looking at formations as the root cause because that makes me hypocritical as at best I think formations are 30% at most, and 70% is about the players. But….I see big issues with the way we play a back three at times. I don’t mind it per se, but I don’t like how we go about playing it. Not enough marking by the 3 CBs. Against a front two, there should be no reason why Grant and Hugill are not marked tightly at all times by Kalas and Baker (in the main) knowing that Atkinson is spare. There really shouldn’t be a case where Grant comes short and Kalas doesn’t go right up his arse. He shouldn’t be able to turn and slide Furlong in under no pressure. If they don’t mark it means someone else trying to drop back like James, and therefore there is no pressure then into midfield, where we get passed around and can’t get enough pressure on the ball. Playing three seems to result in a bit of buck-psssing, e.g. if I don’t mark my man, surely the other two will bail me out. I don’t like that. I generally don’t like Dasilva at LWB, I think he gets caught playing it a bit in no-man’s land. I know plenty on here don’t like him defensively, but I think if you get him with the play in front of him you see a better player and I think he positions himself better defensively too, even if he might have some weaknesses….at least you get the best of him on the ball….and you can build passing moves off of him. Whether Pring could play LWB better I don’t know….but I thought he played really well at LB today. Will observe more. I also think playing 2 CMs and 1 AM is asking for trouble against better teams (QPR / WBA). You might get away with it against lesser sides. We got dominated playing Massengo in-front of James and Bakinson at QPR (but got a smash and grab win) and ditto today with Weimann in-front of James and Massengo. Two different opponent styles, we couldn’t cope with either. Playing them as a flat three would’ve made more sense, at least we’d have had a back eight in two main banks. As it was we had pockets of space for West Brom to find far too often. Back to basics next week please Nige. Disappointed today tactically…even more so with application and commitment. Pring and Wells gave good accounts of themselves today. I didn’t always come off for Wells but at least he carried a threat. An interesting week ahead.
  3. I didn’t expect to get stuffed…I expected a fully committed performance, a performance that would at least keep us in the game. They are a goods side, but we made it easy for them.
  4. Cam Pring....take a bow....our best performer today
  5. Trego - lets see if we can see any signs of tactical changes or tweaks from Nige Well you didnt spot any blatant ones first half, so you've got eff all chance now - jeeeeeeez
  6. Hang on, just gonna tweet Pete Trego to see if he knows. Seriously though....hardwork, commitment, bravery, its not about technical stuff at this point.
  7. Crikey, a City fan receiving medical attention attention, hope he's ok.
  8. I hope there is a real blow-up at h-t. A few home truths needed. Bents very poor for their second goal. Why is White asking Trego how City sort this out second half. Trego in fairness is coming across okay, but I hate White's comms. Toby much better. Sorry, rather deflect how bad City have been to talk about Robinstv.
  9. Awful, awful, awful half of football from City, made worse by awful comms from Robinstv....Dan White is so twee and nice, Trego is not a footballer, adding nothing really. They had no idea Pring came on at LCB and then that we went 442 when Simpson came on. Back to the footie....Massengo all at sea in a ground as far from the coast as you can get. Pring comes out with credit....that's about it. Lucky its only 2-0. Got to improve massively, or it will be a cricket score, which might suit Trego. Please, please play better and maybe whack someone up in the air.
  10. Fly to Frankfurt....quickly create a Windscribe account on a different email
  11. Allegedly the supporter gave a thumbs up on the way out....hope they are ok.
×
×
  • Create New...