Jump to content

Welcome to One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums

Welcome to One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums by signing in or creating an account.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Full access to all forums (not all viewable as guest)
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Support OTIB with a premium membership

IGNORED

Bristol Rovers Dustbin Thread


Recommended Posts

On 02/05/2018 at 15:31, bert tann said:

 

Someone should ask what Mr Karim Mardam-Bey does at Bristol Rovers' £ 250 000 pa London office.

Rich did ask!

On 02/05/2018 at 16:07, Rich said:

Ok Bert. What does Mr Karim Mardam-Bey for Bristol Rovers in his London office?

Probably a brother in law or Uncle.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Eddie Hitler said:

You are a poster for whom I have a lot of respect and for that reason I will drop this now.

Best all round, at least debate is allowed here and differing opinions are usually respected.

in any event, they are bound to do something really crazy soon.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, bert tann said:

Henbury Gas should be the least of anyone's worries.

The share price of the Arab Jordan Investment bank has dropped from 1.77 to 1.40 in the last year bringing market capitalisation down from £280 million to  £220 million which means the value of the Al-Qadi family shares has reduced by  £18 million and is now standing at £66 million. Analysts are concerned at the company's "lack of strategic focus" and policy of "under-investing".  These comments should ring a few bells with Rovers fans and I suspect they will be alarm bells.

But even more intriguing is the possibility of national news headlines for "our beloved club" when revelations surface about what really goes on at Rovers mysterious  £250 000 pa London office.   

 

The plot thickens....

Link to post
Share on other sites

See plenty of them are slating Skeletor now as he’s had a little pop and slated their current owners, in a couple eyes he’s gone from being a ‘gas legend’ to someone they don’t want near their club. 

Everyone bar themselves know that their owners are skint and haven’t got a clue which direction they want to turn, but don’t you dare question them mind, it’s no wonder they are such a shite little club who’s going nowhere.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 26/05/2018 at 14:45, Bianconeri said:

I share the discomfort Eddie, this now goes beyond a wind up in my humble opinion.

Get a grip man, this loser told lie after lie 12 months ago and was shot down in flames by us and even his own and A&S police and herde  he is again spouting his nonsense 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, harrys said:

Get a grip man, this loser told lie after lie 12 months ago and was shot down in flames by us and even his own and A&S police and herde  he is again spouting his nonsense 

Not that my opinion is particularly important, but I must say I tend towards the views of @Eddie Hitler and @Bianconeri.

Henbury Gas appears to live in a fantasy world and has been caught and called out numerous times on both 'Gas' forums, but he appears so thick-skinned (or just thick?) that he continues his nonsense regardless: the majority of his comments have an obvious anti-City bias, often aggressive and largely without truth or foundation, but it is precisely for this reason that such comments are received so warmly by many of his fellow forum members - and, let's be honest, there have been numerous posts (and posters) on this thread that could be described similarly.

Nevertheless, whilst it is one thing to insult HG and to call him a liar on a forum, it is another matter altogether to divulge personal details such as his name and business address, for it only requires one idiot to take matters a stage further, causing damage to his business premises or even violence to HG himself, for matters to escalate out of hand - witness the vandalism to the Memorial Gates.

In conclusion, and whilst I am aware most on this thread are now probably aware of his identity, best to leave criticism of HG to this thread only and not put ideas in to peoples' heads.     

 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

Not that my opinion is particularly important, but I must say I tend towards the views of @Eddie Hitler and @Bianconeri.

Henbury Gas appears to live in a fantasy world and has been caught and called out numerous times on both 'Gas' forums, but he appears so thick-skinned (or just thick?) that he continues his nonsense regardless: the majority of his comments have an obvious anti-City bias, often aggressive and largely without truth or foundation, but it is precisely for this reason that such comments are received so warmly by many of his fellow forum members - and, let's be honest, there have been numerous posts (and posters) on this thread that could be described similarly.

Nevertheless, whilst it is one thing to insult HG and to call him a liar on a forum, it is another matter altogether to divulge personal details such as his name and business address, for it only requires one idiot to take matters a stage further, causing damage to his business premises or even violence to HG himself, for matters to escalate out of hand - witness the vandalism to the Memorial Gates.

In conclusion, and whilst I am aware most on this thread are now probably aware of his identity, best to leave criticism of HG to this thread only and not put ideas in to peoples' heads.     

 

Can see yours and others points of views but although he’s not named anyone specially he’s accusing one of us of assaulting a fellow supporter (which we all know is bullshit) imo until he proves it which he has failed to do on numerous occasions he should be named and shamed, show him up for the bullshitter he is, why should he sit there behind his keyboard making up accusations that involves a serious criminal offence and get away with it? 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, BCFC11 said:

Can see yours and others points of views but although he’s not named anyone specially he’s accusing one of us of assaulting a fellow supporter (which we all know is bullshit) imo until he proves it which he has failed to do on numerous occasions he should be named and shamed, show him up for the bullshitter he is, why should he sit there behind his keyboard making up accusations that involves a serious criminal offence and get away with it? 

 

Whilst I agree that HG's accusation is abhorrent, casting aspersions on all City supporters until it is disproved, I maintain that his personal details should not be disclosed.

I have never met HG, nor do I have any wish to do so, but just consider for a moment that he may be suffering from some mental condition, a condition that makes him post constantly about his beloved Bristol Rovers and to seek approval from his fellow forum members, even if this quest for approval is attempted largely by denigrating City with false allegations simply to make him feel a worthy member of (the Bristol Rovers) society. 

I will give you three examples of his deluded posts:

1. The now 'well documented' attack on a disabled City fan by fellow City fans.

2. His 'contract' to service City's computers.

3. His suggestion that, as a revenge attack on Sainsbury's for breaching their water-tight contract with Rovers, supporters should defacate in a Sainsbury's bag and leave said bag in a fresh food counter, thus causing any food in the counter to be destroyed for H&S reasons.

Surely you will agree that these are not the posts of a sane person. The man is deluded!

We used to have a poster on this forum who appared to have a strange fascination with football socks. I won't mention his forum name to avoid him potential embarrassment, but there were quite a few on here who sought to ridicule him, even though I think it was quite evident he was suffering from some mental condition. Imagine if, 'just for a laugh', somebody had published his address and arranged for a collection of football socks to be dumped at his door. Harmless fun you might say, just banter even, but such an event might have been extremely traumatic for our sock-obsessed forum member, who, of course, was/is a keen City supporter.

Why would you want to encourage somebody to upset HG, no matter how obnoxious he appears to be based on his posts?   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they have hit new levels of delusion:

I quote from Sagchat... 

I think we have a smaller but still large fan base compared to the Teds. Maybe 40:60 these days, optimistically.

The difference is that in recent years, the Teds actually go to games, because they have some very attractive games to watch. And they have a nice new stadium. We have a dump with tents and queues and all the rest nobody wants nowadays.

 

Our sleeping support is dwindling, but not dead, as is shown for the occasional big final.

 

There is still a big fan base out there, but the longer we leave it until we do something about the stadium, the further it will trickle away.

 

40:60 hahahaha:clapping::laughcont:

  • Haha 9
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

Whilst I agree that HG's accusation is abhorrent, casting aspersions on all City supporters until it is disproved, I maintain that his personal details should not be disclosed.

I have never met HG, nor do I have any wish to do so, but just consider for a moment that he may be suffering from some mental condition, a condition that makes him post constantly about his beloved Bristol Rovers and to seek approval from his fellow forum members, even if this quest for approval is attempted largely by denigrating City with false allegations simply to make him feel a worthy member of (the Bristol Rovers) society. 

I will give you three examples of his deluded posts:

1. The now 'well documented' attack on a disabled City fan by fellow City fans.

2. His 'contract' to service City's computers.

3. His suggestion that, as a revenge attack on Sainsbury's for breaching their water-tight contract with Rovers, supporters should defacate in a Sainsbury's bag and leave said bag in a fresh food counter, thus causing any food in the counter to be destroyed for H&S reasons.

Surely you will agree that these are not the posts of a sane person. The man is deluded!

We used to have a poster on this forum who appared to have a strange fascination with football socks. I won't mention his forum name to avoid him potential embarrassment, but there were quite a few on here who sought to ridicule him, even though I think it was quite evident he was suffering from some mental condition. Imagine if, 'just for a laugh', somebody had published his address and arranged for a collection of football socks to be dumped at his door. Harmless fun you might say, just banter even, but such an event might have been extremely traumatic for our sock-obsessed forum member, who, of course, was/is a keen City supporter.

Why would you want to encourage somebody to upset HG, no matter how obnoxious he appears to be based on his posts?   

Like I said I can see both sides, but let’s say he does have a ‘problem’ surely the bloke needs help etc and the correct authorities need to be involved? IIRC it was himself that’s happily plastered his business and address all over the net, no City fan in there right mind would ever pay him a visit to his shop anyway.

His choice to make ridiculous accusations whether he’s sane or not, if someone on here wants to inform the relevant people that’s up to them, but if your going to say what he has without any evidence on a openly public forum, expect the shit whatever comes his way imo.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I do NOT advocate any sort of attack on the bloke or his business and wouldn't personally share his details, BUT, I demand a response to his scurrilous accusations against my / our club, that I find unpalatable and I don't mind admitting it. How someone can spout his abhorrent accusations against the club I / we adore is beyond comprehension and should NOT be allowed without recourse.

That is my 'beef', the fact that he accused BCFC of something which, we all know, is utter rubbish, yet he still continues to accuse us of the same thing without any substance or proof. Surely the club can apply certain pressures through BRFC / the BRFC forum via legal channels to shut the ***** up?

Maybe, being devils advocate, it DID happen (god forbid) and the corporate machine are sweeping it under the carpet? I just hate the fact that nothing is being done.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JBFC II said:

I think they have hit new levels of delusion:

I quote from Sagchat... 

I think we have a smaller but still large fan base compared to the Teds. Maybe 40:60 these days, optimistically.

The difference is that in recent years, the Teds actually go to games, because they have some very attractive games to watch. And they have a nice new stadium. We have a dump with tents and queues and all the rest nobody wants nowadays.

 

Our sleeping support is dwindling, but not dead, as is shown for the occasional big final.

 

There is still a big fan base out there, but the longer we leave it until we do something about the stadium, the further it will trickle away.

 

40:60 hahahaha:clapping::laughcont:

Yet another Saghead admitting that most of their fanbase are a bunch of part time plastics who won’t go and support their own team unless they’re playing a big club with a nice comfy seat to sit in.

They love to make they’re something special then they come out with that excuse.

What happened to “if they play in the street, we’ll watch from the pavements” rubbish they were spouting after the UWE Stadium fell through? 

Full of shit.

Edited by Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

Not that my opinion is particularly important, but I must say I tend towards the views of @Eddie Hitler and @Bianconeri.

Henbury Gas appears to live in a fantasy world and has been caught and called out numerous times on both 'Gas' forums, but he appears so thick-skinned (or just thick?) that he continues his nonsense regardless: the majority of his comments have an obvious anti-City bias, often aggressive and largely without truth or foundation, but it is precisely for this reason that such comments are received so warmly by many of his fellow forum members - and, let's be honest, there have been numerous posts (and posters) on this thread that could be described similarly.

Nevertheless, whilst it is one thing to insult HG and to call him a liar on a forum, it is another matter altogether to divulge personal details such as his name and business address, for it only requires one idiot to take matters a stage further, causing damage to his business premises or even violence to HG himself, for matters to escalate out of hand - witness the vandalism to the Memorial Gates.

In conclusion, and whilst I am aware most on this thread are now probably aware of his identity, best to leave criticism of HG to this thread only and not put ideas in to peoples' heads.     

 

The best way to avoid retribution for posting lies and vindictive rubbish on a forum, is to not post it..!

I have no sympathy for any troll who get called out and regrets the shite they’ve posted. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, bert tann said:

Henbury Gas should be the least of anyone's worries.

The share price of the Arab Jordan Investment bank has dropped from 1.77 to 1.40 in the last year bringing market capitalisation down from £280 million to  £220 million which means the value of the Al-Qadi family shares has reduced by  £18 million and is now standing at £66 million. Analysts are concerned at the company's "lack of strategic focus" and policy of "under-investing".  These comments should ring a few bells with Rovers fans and I suspect they will be alarm bells.

But even more intriguing is the possibility of national news headlines for "our beloved club" when revelations surface about what really goes on at Rovers mysterious  £250 000 pa London office.   

 

Thanks as always Bert. Losing £18m has got to hurt anyone's wallet. Given the family wealth is now only £66m, any significant investment in the Rovers represents a huge risk from the family. If WAQ is using his own share of the wealth, the risk is even greater. 

Looks like it'll be evolution not revolution for the foreseeable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, BrightCiderLife said:

Thanks as always Bert. Losing £18m has got to hurt anyone's wallet. Given the family wealth is now only £66m, any significant investment in the Rovers represents a huge risk from the family. If WAQ is using his own share of the wealth, the risk is even greater. 

Looks like it'll be evolution not revolution for the foreseeable. 

To be followed very shortly by destitution

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Red Right Hand said:

To be followed very shortly by destitution

I find it deeply ironic, they started out as the black arabs, now they will be finished off by Cash Strapped Arabs.

:banana::banana::banana:

Edited by SimonR
  • Haha 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...