Dastardly and Muttley Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Super said: Did he play for Rovers? Yes - about 4 games on loan, they mentioned it in commentary last game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
054123 Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 24 minutes ago, 1960maaan said: I think the rule is when the ball stops moving, or goes out of play. Plenty have counted when they've not gone straight in. The ball may touch the goalkeeper, goal posts, or crossbar any number of times before going into the goal as long as the referee believes the ball's motion is the result of the initial kick. This was clarified after an incident in the 1986 World Cup shoot-out between Braziland France. Bruno Bellone's kick rebounded out off the post, hit goalkeeper Carlos's back, and subsequently bounced into the goal. Referee Ioan Igna gave the goal to France, and Brazil captain Edinhowas booked for protesting that the kick should have been considered a miss as soon as it rebounded off the post. In 1987, the International Football Association Board clarified Law 14, covering penalty kicks, to support Igna's decision.[9] Interesting, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppyDAZE Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Super said: How is this 0-0?! Because neither team has scored Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted May 12, 2019 Report Share Posted May 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Spud55 said: Dunno that keeper reminds me of the flying pig Martin Taylor who used to alway play a blinder against us for Wycombe. THAT was Jim Eadie ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numero Uno Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 14 hours ago, 054123 said: The ball may touch the goalkeeper, goal posts, or crossbar any number of times before going into the goal as long as the referee believes the ball's motion is the result of the initial kick. This was clarified after an incident in the 1986 World Cup shoot-out between Braziland France. Bruno Bellone's kick rebounded out off the post, hit goalkeeper Carlos's back, and subsequently bounced into the goal. Referee Ioan Igna gave the goal to France, and Brazil captain Edinhowas booked for protesting that the kick should have been considered a miss as soon as it rebounded off the post. In 1987, the International Football Association Board clarified Law 14, covering penalty kicks, to support Igna's decision.[9] Interesting, I think. So basically the ball was still in motion as a result of the initial kick, the keeper hadn’t completed his dive and it hit his foot and went in. By the rules the ref got it spot on last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1960maaan Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 18 hours ago, slartibartfast said: THAT was Jim Eadie ! He was just a pig, no flying involved. I wonder if he kept the TV and pasties he stole from the gAss club, the name escapes me, used to be in the Old Tote end car park. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidered abroad Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 20 hours ago, 054123 said: The ball may touch the goalkeeper, goal posts, or crossbar any number of times before going into the goal as long as the referee believes the ball's motion is the result of the initial kick. This was clarified after an incident in the 1986 World Cup shoot-out between Braziland France. Bruno Bellone's kick rebounded out off the post, hit goalkeeper Carlos's back, and subsequently bounced into the goal. Referee Ioan Igna gave the goal to France, and Brazil captain Edinhowas booked for protesting that the kick should have been considered a miss as soon as it rebounded off the post. In 1987, the International Football Association Board clarified Law 14, covering penalty kicks, to support Igna's decision.[9] Interesting, I think. Am I correct that next season, the law will change and a similar save, post, off keeper into net, will be a goal kick, no goal and also no goal in a penalty shoot out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 20 hours ago, AppyDAZE said: Because neither team has scored Don't you just hate it when posters know the laws of the game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 11 minutes ago, 1960maaan said: He was just a pig, no flying involved. I wonder if he kept the TV and pasties he stole from the gAss club, the name escapes me, used to be in the Old Tote end car park. The Eastville Club... Good keeper was 'Jim! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, cidered abroad said: Am I correct that next season, the law will change and a similar save, post, off keeper into net, will be a goal kick, no goal and also no goal in a penalty shoot out? Amended for Bristol City penalties, so that once the ball has been struck by the penalty taker's boot then it is no goal, a goal kick and a 3 game ban for one of City's defenders.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1960maaan Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 News Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roe Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 55 minutes ago, cidered abroad said: Am I correct that next season, the law will change and a similar save, post, off keeper into net, will be a goal kick, no goal and also no goal in a penalty shoot out? Nah, that's nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numero Uno Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 1 hour ago, cidered abroad said: Am I correct that next season, the law will change and a similar save, post, off keeper into net, will be a goal kick, no goal and also no goal in a penalty shoot out? No, what they were talking about was only the initial shot would count but no rebounds. The scenario you stated would still count as a goal. Not sure it’s being introduced anyway though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 1 hour ago, 1960maaan said: He was just a pig, no flying involved. I wonder if he kept the TV and pasties he stole from the gAss club, the name escapes me, used to be in the Old Tote end car park. True Blue club weren't it and that was before Babestation ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
054123 Posted May 13, 2019 Report Share Posted May 13, 2019 8 hours ago, Numero Uno said: So basically the ball was still in motion as a result of the initial kick, the keeper hadn’t completed his dive and it hit his foot and went in. By the rules the ref got it spot on last night. Correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.