Jump to content

Monkeh

Members
  • Posts

    28941
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

Everything posted by Monkeh

  1. They have to pay money for a professional company......
  2. No disabled facilities, isn't this against EFL rules?
  3. In hos defense, alot of people in the public eye do that, its to protect their workplace, Doesn't stop him being a jockey of the door knob verity
  4. Where have I said we won't miss him?, I've said he's better defensively then attacking All his stats back that up, for city and for England,
  5. Where have I said he's bad going forward? I Said we need more goals from midfield, Scott scored 2 from midfield last season, I never said he's poor going forward, I said he's better defensively and when he goes that's what we are going to miss the most, Not once have I said he's not good going forward
  6. As well as the players in the under 21's We do need more goals from midfield, That's if Scott stays or goes as he isnt much of a goalscorer and better at the defensive side of the game
  7. Why, he's a manager, he knows the financial situation, He know his budget He knows Scott would leave once a suitable bid had been received He'd know how much that price would be and he knows how much of that he would be likely to spend I'm really doubtful he'd be disgruntled, Disappointed at losing a good player yes, disgruntled doubtful
  8. No I'm talking about the wolves bit, We never accepted a bid from them
  9. No we aren't, King James Knight Naismith when fit Benarous Williams That's 6 players playing for 2 maybe 3 places You've also got other players who are perfectly capable there
  10. If that's the same game I'm thinking about, the club sold some seat twice that night
  11. I wouldnt be surprised of there are problems at the turnstiles on Saturday ?
  12. Oh I agree, and that's how we would treat things, City's ambition is to be the best and finish top half of the prem Rovers ambitions is to finish 1 place above city, That's what hold them back, they care more about what we are doing and not about what idiot owners have done to their club, It's that short termism that got them relegated from the football league
  13. This is a right mess, this has been poorly implemented and badly communicated The club should be ashamed
  14. Was it Darlington that built a ground far too big for them, then became a white elephant which lead to bankruptcy as well as dodgy ownership
  15. Would be nice, but we don't have enough depth, We won't trouble the bottom but I don't think we'd have a sustained push for the play-offs ether, Still it's improving all the time, which is great
  16. A players value is what the club thinks it is and what another club is willing to spend,
  17. This is why they should of given supporters an option when renewing not telling us its going fully digital halfway through the renewal period,
  18. Any Arab billionaire wouldn't be wasting their time with a 3rd division club stuck in a non league ground and train on a Sunday league pitch,
  19. It is though, it says nothing, Nothing about a bid being accepted Nothing about these advance talks The article is the very definition so speculation, How can you have advance talks with a player for example if you haven't even bid, It's nonsense, it's an article designed to filter traffic to a site for add revenue, Nothing more, I cant believe I'm saying this, but the post is alot better then this rubbish
  20. I'm thinking more of a Portsmouth type takeover rather then toon style takeover
×
×
  • Create New...