semblar

If they do not go up, it is valid for a minimum of 11 years (1 yr in the championship, plus 10 if they went up), so they should recognise 1/11 of the price in the books. Each year they should repeat this, using 1/11 of the balance carried forwards from the previous year. This would continue until (if) they went up, at which point you would spread the remaining amount over 10 years

To their moral/spiritual home - Eastville park. Even WAQ could afford to put a rope around the pitch and to pay BCC a rental fee

Love the way an update to the swear filter has transformed the last few posts

FTFY

which proves what everybody has been saying about the quality of journalism today

@phantom That explains why I was treated to a revisitation of page 56

Strangely enough, that's about the same ratio as their perception of WAQ's wealth and what he really had available...

I hope you're making sure you are going to get all your change, assuming that this is an offer to buy the "club" from that very nice man (or at least the family who let him play with it...)

They originally owned eastville Ikea but then sold it when they were skint

It would indeed. Besides, they're more Tent boys these days....

At least Salford City feel able to pay transfer fees....unlike the rich ones (rich with humour for us, at least)

isn't the quality of their football - ahem - "fertiliser"??

Wouldn't it be amusing if he actually heard it at AG

I'm guessing the answer is "whenever we need to, but it is routine so we don't feel the need to proclaim it to the world as if it was a new signing"

Fixed

Like @CliftonCliff , I have not recovered sufficiently I'm afraid. Whilst far inferior to the reality, I will be taking a similar approach. COYR, shout loud enough to cover the sufferers amongst us!

Why would we want to improve the place for them?

They didn't have larger attendances though - both were zero for six years due to WW2 (so omitted in the graph). My apologies for not applying the seemingly obligatory #Gaslogic at the end of the comment

So they could technically claim that there were 6 consecutive years where we didn't have larger attendances than them? Darn it, der Gas are just the hugest club and we have no hope of bettering them.....

Can somebody please explain to me how encouraging them to improve the place is a good idea...?

So long as they don't manage to better our performance the year after, I'll live with that.....

More likely that it's the small percentage of those who are so sick of being shut out for every match that their desperation to actually get in overwhelmed their disgust at Swindon's double-charging decision....the other 999999 would have stayed in the car park like normal

Perhaps @Tomarse would be able to work some magic handwavium with the forum and give people a profile setting to not allow them to see this thread? Saves them moaning, allows the rest of us to continue with the pisstaking

It was obvious of course... he referred to a 'Lucid Gashead'.....

Could you please explain again how we can drop 1 point?