Dr Balls

This would be the same Weimann who scored the one-on-one against Watford? That was exactly the sort of chance he thrives on. Plus he has been struggling with a foot injury for most of the season so far. He still has a lot to offer, if played correctly. Starting him out wide doesn’t get the best out of him. Having TGH playing balls through to him would work, but then that’s the problem. All of our forwards seem to prefer through balls to run onto rather than taking it directly in front of the defender. Only Cornick seems able to take those balls and lay it off, but he can’t score!

Might also suggest it’s easier to see the problems sat up in the stand than from pitch side. I know Shteeve McLaren got a bashing for it but watching the first half from an elevated position as per the rugby teams these days does make a lot of sense. You can see patterns of play that would be impossible to pick out at ground level and allows for a change of tactics at half time. Too simplistic?

A lot of forwards but we can’t score and we are playing a midfielder up front (Knight). Suggests the problems might be in the supply and the formation. Something for Manning to ponder but will he change?

They could but I don’t think they could make a pair right now. Too naive and also too weak. Wells may not have Bell’s pure speed but he more than makes up for that in nous and strength. It’s also extremely unlikely that they would do that for us, because if either is really that good, we will sell them just like we always do. On that basis, a front pairing for Bournemouth in 5 years time? Maybe!!

Firstly define what kind of player you need. Secondly look around at who might be available and affordable. Form a list and rank them and then see who you can get. Most likely, it will either be someone not currently getting a game at this level with not much time left on their contract, or a player from a lower league either home or abroad. That’s the long and short of it, and the problem is there is no guarantee that what you really want even exists, which is where you may have to compromise. Cornick strikes me as a “compromise buy” as a replacement for Chris Martin. But as we now know his strike rate makes Martin look like Pele!

Your last paragraph sums it up. The powers that be sacked a manager who was popular with the fans and one of which we could generally see what he was trying to do with the resources he was afforded. Even the players brought in the summer with what budget he was given were good buys: Dickie, Knight, TGH. We weren’t really failing but JL decided to replace experience with potential that may or may not exist or be realised. That’s the risk they have taken and although this was supposedly about the short term I.e. making the top 6 this season, there is little or no evidence for that happening. Hence why Manning has been given no honeymoon to speak of by many of the fans, because it was a change that many felt was unnecessary. And at least so far it hasn’t gone as badly as Rooney at Brum.

Oh I don’t know about that. In 15 games he seems to have transformed the Birmingham team under Eustace that outplayed us in August into a useless relegation-threatened joke. I would suggest that’s quite some change!

Trying to make corned beef hash and baked beans pleasant on the eye really sums up where we are. I would like us to be entertaining in our style and win matches. However I am enough of a pragmatist to know that the ingredients of our squad mean that’s not possible very often, so I would accept winning but pragmatic football I.e. 1-0 wins. At least I leave the ground happy at the end of the game. What none of us want is turgid, safety-first, low entertainment, ineffective, no scoring, possession-based amongst our defenders, drawing or losing football, because we are trying to be something our current players cannot perform at this level. I would expect our team to have more possession and look great against League 1 opposition such as Oxford. If Manning was assuming that these players could do the same against better teams at this level, then you would suggest he was either naive or deluded or both!

Hate to say it but I don’t think Hutchinson would have been able to do that against Chris Martin. It’s his type of player that we have failed to replace.

If no need to sell, we shouldn’t, especially as bids are likely to way lower than anything what we got for Semenyo. His value will actually have reduced this season compared to the end of last season, as clubs will have spotted more of his weaknesses and learnt little more about his strengths.

Weimann got all his goals in 21/22 as the player behind a front 2 of Semenyo and Martin. I still think he would get more goals in that position than anyone else we have. The conundrum is how to fit Knight into midfield. Perhaps a 4-3-1-2 with Sykes as a RWB, Pring at LWB and a midfield 3 of Knight, TGH and either James or Williams, with a front 2 of Conway and Wells, and Weimann just behind them. That would definitely be a team “playing on the front foot”.

At the price being quoted for us to make TGH permanent (supposedly £1.3M) we would really struggle to find another 22 year old midfielder with 100 Chsmpionship appearances and his quality. If Manning chose not to go ahead with the permanent deal then you would really have to question his judgement of players. We currently have no other player who can do what he does, especially in terms of shooting outside of the box. In fact, we have been missing that since Joe Bryan left.

Ever since we made it back into the Championship under Cotterill, we have struggled against teams that sit back, defend and gift us the majority of possession. That only changed more recently as Scott grew into that role of driving forward from midfield. TGH is the next best thing that we currently have in the squad for that role, but if you don’t start him then we really struggle. And the statistics have been pretty damning for a long time - we are better without the ball I.e. we win more often when we have less of the possession, which was why we often did better against better teams and ended up drawing a blank against teams at the bottom who were scrapping for points. It also explains our years of poor home form and comparatively better away form. Nige had us playing as a counter-attacking side because he realised that we were better suited to that approach. That requires pace up front, which is where Sykes, Bell, Weimann and Wells all fit in. And that’s also why Nige had targeted improving fitness levels pre-season. Our good run at the beginning of last season was really with a counter-attacking style, with both Wells and Conway up front. But even then they needed someone playing through balls from midfield, and with the best will in the world that is not something any of us would describe as a strength of either James or Williams. So setting up with both of them in midfield yesterday was always likely to be pretty uninspiring. There are some decent players in our squad who on their day can play as well as anyone in this division. The trick is how to fit them into a team and formation that maximises its positives and minimises its weaknesses. My understanding from how his teams played previously was that Manning was keen on quick transitions. That would suit most of our squad in a way that possession-based football would not. And he also really needs a “Plan B” when “Plan A” isn’t working. I don’t want the LJ “clubs in the bag” approach but having the option of a strong target man up front as an alternative would really help. I accept that Manning has only had 11 games as Head Coach with our squad and at this level, but if he and his coaching team haven’t started to appreciate some of the issues that many of us can see then that would be worrying.

Agree that trying to play Tommy as a target man up front is a complete waste of time and effort. He needs someone else up front with him, and he should be making those runs in behind. Keeping him central, battling it out with larger, more physical centre backs is just plain dumb.

This has been said ever since Tommy returned from injury. His goals are coming from penalties rather than open play. He’s not a lone striker and as long as we play 4-2-3-1, and especially without Gardner-Hickman in midfield, we are going to struggle for goals, especially against teams that “park the bus” like Millwall.

I don’t know a bring a number 2. Many on here already think he is a load of “Number 2”! And now so do many Hibs and Fleetwood fans…

Many a striker would love to have scored that! Any chance Bajic could do similar? Maybe not…

And a pink cardboard ticket that got clipped around the edge at every game so that by the end of the season you had this frayed bit of mashed pink that if you were lucky was just about still legible but about 25% smaller than when you originally got it!

The official EFL “Pearson Penalty Embargo” has clearly been lifted and City will now be showered with penalties at a rate of 1 every home game! You do have to wonder and maybe Manning is just lucky rather than good. Was Napoleon’s preference in generals, so perhaps that time in Guernsey has had an effect on Lansdown, wishing for the same in Head Coaches!

Interesting to see from the stats that we had more shots than them (21 v 16), plus more on target (5 v 4) and more corners (7 v 6). I agree they liked better in possession and going forward, and they could have been 3-1 or 4-1 up at half time, even without the softest penalty award ever, but they weren’t, thanks to some last ditch defending. As for our second and third goals, I thought they were richly deserved. On another night, we might have lost but we didn’t. And after last minute mugging against both Stoke and Norwich this season we are due a bit of luck.

Yeah but they don’t have a “nest egg”. Gotta love a “nest egg”!

Wasn’t he one of the Italians caught up in a gambling scandal? As for TGH, I am going to stick my neck out and say that from a purely attacking perspective he’s a better option than Scott and certainly more likely to score. I know many might disagree on that point, but if the buyout really is only £1.3M, i.e. about 1/20th of the fee we got for Scott, we would be bonkers not to trigger it. Along with Dickie and O’Leary, he was one of the only players in Saturday’s performance that were better than their Sunderland opposite number.

Having read “The Bluffers Guide to Football Coaching and Management”. Even after some experience in the role, his luck had to run out eventually even with the least critical of owners. And nothing he has done since suggests that he’s actually any good at it. He peaked with Bristol City and that Carabao Cup run. It has been downhill from then on. Plus he passed on his anti-Midas touch to Dean Holden…

First half good going forward but even then he often left Pring with a 3 on 1 of Pring versus Roberts, Pritchard and Huggins. How Sunderland didn’t score from those chances also says something about their lack of cutting edge up front. Mehmeti offers something going forward but he has so much to learn in how to be a complete player and tracking back for the sake of the team in terms of defensive duties. The difference when Weimann came on second half was obvious.

No first mistake was about 20 minutes in when Vyner clearly expected and wanted him to come out and claim the ball. Instead hr stayed on his line for once and Vyner got in a real mess that nearly led to a goal. However his shot stopping was top drawer, but then so was Bentley’s and that wasn’t the reason the latter was let go. It was because Max was both cheaper and possibly had better distribution / was happy to play as a sweeper-keeper. All that said some really good saves and ultimately the reason why we kept a clean sheet when everything suggested that they were going to roll us over quite easily.