Jump to content

BobBobSuperBob

Members
  • Posts

    19209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    191

Everything posted by BobBobSuperBob

  1. Spooky I laughed at the irony one of their thread titles
  2. This is the original post from the bloke who received it who’s a very established poster where Hamers name is correct The second is the first reply where it appears the poster is having a little chuckle / sarcastic dig at Mr Hamer by editing / changing his name
  3. We read it differently then I’ve seen e-mails of a similar nature that Hamer has sent before / previously and it’s a very good imitation if it isn’t genuine as written in a very similar way to others I’ve seen I’m not going to worry too much whether it’s is or not tbh
  4. @Unan Just had a nose at Sag-chat Looks like the e-mail is genuine - was sent to ‘Bideford Gas’ Who appears a sensible poster As I say fair play to Hamer to reply Funny after DC was so candid only hours before
  5. The original reply is Gamer Somebody copied since and now reads Gamer
  6. Have to respect the bloke (Hamer) for replying Tbf
  7. Steady Where else will our posters turn when they need some expert legal guidance
  8. Getting warm Columbo Indeed the alleged victim needs to be spoken to by the Police to see if any such incident has taken place and , if so , whether they are willing to make a statement if not the officer can at least make some enquiries and check CCTV covering the persons seat Asfar as I can decipher the one and only person that we are aware of who allegedly knows the identity of said alleged victim is Henbury Gas Which is why the officer is speaking to Henbury Gas Which (Strangely) doesn’t appear to sit well with you Is that too complicated for you ?
  9. In summary E- ‘Needs to improve basic knowledge’ Im glad that it’s your gashead mates you are more likely to impart your ‘ legal knowledge ‘ on They must be delighted when it turns out you’ve talked utter ****.and left them adrift and in the kak
  10. For somebody who claims to know about the law Your post is actually laughable and completely clueless Without ripping the post apart word by word Ill summarise for you to keep it simple 1 ’Henbury Gas has (repeatedly) claimed a criminal offence has taken place 2 The Police , with a bit more than ‘fancy getting involved’ or ‘sticking their noses in’ , actually have a duty to investigate the matter to a sufficient degree to firstly establish if a criminal offences has taken place Which is what they appear to be doing Hope that’s explained simply for you And May I suggest you keep your area of legal ‘expertise’ ( ) to your Gashead mates
  11. I’d have assumed you might want to convict them first Or is a football fan different to the rest of the population So you apply for a banning order without them being convicted of any offence ?
  12. Not sure his strength was the major issue today it was more positioning / decision making
  13. Good call / comparison mate My initial view is potentially wasted , long term, as a ‘sit in’ left back Not sure he’s got the tools as an attacking LB in JB style He screams (Potentially) Class Centre Half to me (Just needs experience and to learn the wise bits)
  14. Totally agree I advocated playing him at CH but in retrospect , with Sharpe and Clarke upmfront for them it maybe wasn’t the ideal opponents He will have learnt (And some very harsh lessons which were punished) more in 45 mins at CH today 5han he would in 20 games for the academy
  15. He also said , with a giggle, how ‘exciting’ it was going to be ‘keeping the best of what we have and adding to it’ ‘keeping the best of what we have’ How that equates to potentially losing Reid / Flint / Bryan etc is quite beyond me btw Maybe He means keeping Engvall Eliasson and Walsh More and more he reminds me of someone playing Football Manager on a PC
  16. On today’s showing I’d use him as a left back but look to develop him at CH for periods when opportunities arise and Carabao Cup etc - LB more forgiving and more likely to get away with mistakes whilst learning , there , than CH IMHO We could yet find out he’s not suited to Centre Half but if he sharpens up / gets wiser I think he has the potential to be a Class left sided Rio Ferdinand type Centre Half - if that happened , as a left sided Centre Half - what would he be worth !!!!!! If he is a quick learner and wises up to the demands of Championship Football I Think he’s got enough about him , and there some signs that he could be a first pick centre half before the end of next season) (I know that sounds crazy after today but my genuine belief) Think he’d be perfect on LHS of 3 centre halves if we were tempted to play that way Young , talented but understandably not too street wise at Championship Levels (Two experienced heads in Sharpe and Clarke bossed him totally) and a bit of a reality check from some on here thinking we can play Vyner and Kelly as Centre Backs next season (We’d be relegated by March) Ive said in last couple of weeks that to rely even on Kelly as a first pick centre half next season would be crazy and unfair upon Kelly himself A year of gradual integration for me Vyner has done well at Plymouth but had a dodgy game yesterday by all accounts and is behind Kelly in perceived talent and progression atm
  17. Fair point / question Nogs My answer (If I was Head Coach) would be a) that the signs of class / ability and his strengths / build / athleticism he has Will suit him more in future as a Centre Half than a LB b) Generally I’d suggest if you have a talent - he’s likely to benefit / contribute / influence more as a Centre Half than a Left Back
  18. 12247 Not bad with the stadium development andboff the back of a run of shite seasons
  19. Bizarre - suddenly we’ve stopped moving off ball , Can’t pass - like someone switched a light off
  20. FANNNNTASTIC GOal Great cross JB Great head down FD and Boooooooom Great finish On half volley from Bobby Great stuff
×
×
  • Create New...