Jump to content

TonyTonyTony

OTIB Supporter
  • Posts

    7849
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by TonyTonyTony

  1. 11 minutes ago, Robbored said:

    It’s always been nonsense Phants. Bristol lost out having win the Championship in the play offs.The format was introduced in 2005/6 simply for tv money. 
     

    Loads of sports use play off systems, and in the Premiership its been around for years so its a bit pointless bleating now. TV money is needed - now more than ever

    • Like 1
  2. 6 hours ago, phantom said:

    A major scheme to reopen the Portishead to Bristol railway line has reached an important milestone.

    The Planning Inspectorate (PINS) has written to North Somerset Council confirming the date for the proposals for the reopening of the Portishead Branch Line to be examined. The examination is part of the complex Development Consent Order (DCO) process.

    Nationally-significant infrastructure projects require a DCO before they can be built. As part of the process, the Planning Inspectorate is required to hold the examination, which takes around six months.

    The DCO application to reopen the Portishead line is part of the MetroWest Phase 1 scheme, a West of England Combined Authority and North Somerset Council project delivered in partnership with Network Rail. The project was accepted by the Planning Inspectorate in December 2019.

    The scheme involves reopening over 5km of railway which will be added to the national network, the construction of two new stations at Portishead and Pill and works to upgrade 9km of freight only railway. This will enable an hourly passenger train service on a reopened Portishead Line, while maintaining the current freight train operation to and from Royal Portbury Dock.

    In addition, the wider Phase 1 proposals (not part of the examination), will bring significant train service improvements to two other railway lines – the Severn Beach Line and the Westbury to Bristol Line –  and will deliver train service upgrades for 16 existing stations.

    During the examination, the inspectors will look in detail at the DCO application which seeks powers to build and operate the disused section of railway from Portishead to Pill,  minor works to the existing freight railway through the Avon Gorge and for the compulsory acquisition of land needed for the railway to reopen.

    The 46-page letter received from the Planning Inspectorate (known as a Rule 6 letter) confirms the appointment of the panel of inspectors who will be undertaking the examination, the date of the first meetings, and timescales for the six month process. The process begins with a preliminary meeting which is being held online because of Covid-19 restrictions and will be in two parts on Tuesday 6 October and Monday 19 October.

    After these meetings, the formal examination process begins, with an open floor hearing on the evening of Monday 19 October when interested parties can give the panel their views on the project.

    West of England Mayor, Tim Bowles said: “We are making major investments in our public transport network to improve rail services right across the West of England, including the reopening of the Portishead and Henbury lines, new stations and more frequent services to Bath, Westbury, Yate and Gloucester.

    “I welcome the start of the examination process for the reopening of the Portishead Line that will take us a step closer to connecting more local people to jobs, education and leisure opportunities across the region. Creating more sustainable travel options will help cut congestion, improve air quality and make our area an even more attractive place for people to live, work and play.”

    The Leader of North Somerset Council Cllr Don Davies said the council was delighted that the public examination process was about to begin.

    “This is a hugely complex scheme that has to go through many stages in order to progress. The start of the examination process is one of those key milestones, and we anticipate it will be a very intense six months for the project.

    “The Portishead line is a key priority scheme putting jobs and infrastructure into the heart of our economic growth strategy. Despite all of the current challenges we are pressing on with a nationally significant project that will deliver wide ranging environmental and economic benefits to our region, and all aspects need to be considered by the Planning Inspectorate.

    “Once completed, MetroWest Phase 1 will connect an additional 50,000 residents directly to the national rail network and improve the level of service for a further 180,000 residents on the Severn Beach and Westbury corridors.”

    The upgrade for the Severn Beach and Westbury lines are set to see improved train services start in 2021 with the Portishead line re-opening in 2024.

    More information about the DCO examination process can be found at the Planning Inspectorate’s webpage: https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/south-west/portishead-branch-line-metrowest-phase-1/

    Benefits of the wider MetroWest scheme include:

    • 181,000 fewer car trips in the opening year, increasing to 278,000 fewer car trips a year by 2036
    • A reduction of 7.5 million car kilometres in the opening year
    • 958,980 passenger trips by rail in the opening year increasing to 1,295,103 passenger trips by 2036
    • Bringing more than 50,000 people within the immediate catchment of the two new stations at Portishead and Pill
    • Providing better access to employment and educational opportunities
    • Upgrading the existing train service at 16 stations across three rail corridors, directly benefiting 180,000 people within a 1km catchment
    • Creating 514 new direct permanent jobs and temporary jobs during construction
    • Providing £3 of quantified benefits for every £1 invested to deliver the scheme, putting the scheme in the high value for money category
    • Enhancing the regional economy by £264m in the first ten years

    TAKEN FROM: https://www.westofengland-ca.gov.uk/portishead-rail-moves-a-step-closer/

    I dunno why the don’t stop ******* about and get on with it 

  3. 29 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

    Not having a go at you Triple-T, but why does everyone always suggest it’s the PL that should bail out the EFL clubs?

    Why not the EFL itself, or the FA, or the PFA?

    I doubt the EFL / PFA have the money. I agree re the FA - they should step in but the PL is where the cash is. We are in unprecedented times - they should make a contribution to saving clubs going out of business - call it morality if you want

    • Like 5
  4. 22 minutes ago, downendcity said:

    If this carries on for another 2 years I doubt there would be any other teams left for us to play,even if SL continued to bankroll the club! :shocking:

    It is terrible. How many of the L2/L2/NL clubs are going to survive is beyond me. Maybe a solidarity fund from the PL clubs, but i cant see them doing it - they rather spunk 50M on players. If clubs do go to the wall, and the PL keep paying 200 grand a week and spending on transfers i will be disgusted. Football is our national game and must survive. The government wont help, so its either the fans / philanthropic owners or PL step in. 

    • Robin 1
  5. 1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

     

    Stock markets- and I mean globally as you can't have one nation shutting and leaving itself open- but should it be suspended globally for a period?

    Whilst business is still functioning, which has to happen or we are all doomed the markets will remain open. 

    The effect on pension funds is massive and tragic hence the scale of the central banks measures.

    I know a bloke who is due to retire in June and he is in pieces. Poor bastard. Worked all his life and now facing either a poor retirement or working for another 10 years.

    • Thanks 1
  6. 15 minutes ago, Wade Wilson said:

    Genuine question, how many of you are still planning to go to upcoming City games? 

    Mate - I genuinely don’t know. I’ve lost pension money on the stock market - the world has turned upside down in a few weeks. I’m 50:50 to sit inside a cupboard for a month, or say **** it and go to the game and shout out my support. 

    These are unprecedented times. Thank **** for Malbec 

  7. With all the money sloshing around the top level of the game its mental a club the size of Bolton may go out of existence. I totally get that they have been mismanaged but owners of football clubs are largely transient - the fans are not. However it’s the fans who will suffer. Any club is one bad owner away from being in this position. Something very wrong indeed. I hope they find a solution

    • Like 1
  8. 42 minutes ago, Andy082005 said:

    Absolutely disgusting 

    Both clubs should be ******* ashamed of themselves 

    Not only did neither club front up for the private search , they are both now arguing over the transfer money. The poor ****** still hasn't even been found 

    If you ever needed proof that greed and money had ruined the game....this is it. 

    I am.genuinely disgusted by this . Vile

    Agreed. I don’t think anybody would disagree that the transfer fee needs to be sorted out but do it after the funeral and behind the scenes. Playing it out now and in this manner is not cool

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...