Jump to content

Bannerman

Members
  • Posts

    134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bannerman

  1. Really! Spitting is a physical assault which is a criminal offence and should have been charged and sacked for it. Le Tissiers only made comments what he thought was correct at the time. Sad world we live in to compare the two.
  2. He hasn’t got a clue, he’s too defensive mindednesses
  3. Your wearing red tinted glasses
  4. ….. and with the thug on the other side of the river
  5. Although I can agree with your sentiments regarding fans. Unfortunately fans are not appreciated anymore only as “cash cows”.
  6. It maybe rife amongst your group but not mine, I’ve never tried it and I don’t wish to. The statement was a stupid, I can only read what’s in front me. I cannot read his mind if was not meant to be taken literally.
  7. Go and play with your toys you moron (moronic). Intelligent debate ??????????
  8. Your feeling or opinions is not my concern, I don’t need to justify anything. The proof is out there and as time goes by will come to light, which beginning to happen. Some of the remarks on here is beyond belief , if you want to accept wants being fed to you, that’s your choice but don’t visit your crap on me. Your just a keyboard idiot which I have little time for.
  9. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-commencing-1-july-2021/freedom-of-information-request-on-reg-174-for-pfizer-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-foi-21-611?fbclid=IwAR18-qlT1m46b3_pxh-kerCtsfetVdOoQS_Iq_BKlu4hZqt_cyXyX7YR8e0 this added to early deaths, and will make you think twice (three) times about having the jab
  10. Unfortunately, Fear is the key. Live your life as normal as you can, this may go on for awhile yet.
  11. Really! Obviously you don’t listen to the political programs. Boris and his cronies are liars. Boris is a proven lair by the law lords. He constantly lies and you buy into his rhetorics. So what part of truth do you accept the little lies, or big lies or the truth within the lies?
  12. A narrow minded response yet again. What makes you think your common sense is right. There is always different scientific views open your mind and get out of your box, you will see a bigger picture than hiding behind your fears.
  13. Spot on, there claims already won and more to come. Solicitors are inundated with claims
  14. Am glad your not in position of power, you have no idea what your talking about
  15. A doctor in the UK who was banned from using social media by the General Medical Council for claiming “masks do nothing” has won his case in the High Court. Dr. Samuel White was slapped with and 18 month ban by the GMC after he posted a video to Instagram and Twitter in June questioning the efficacy of face coverings. In the video, White said why he could no longer tolerate working in his previous roles because of the “lies” around the NHS and the government’s response to the pandemic, which were “so vast” he could no longer “stomach” them. White also committed the ultimate sin of remarking, “masks do nothing” to stop the spread of COVID, despite this being the consensus medical opinion at the start of the pandemic before it mysteriously switched almost overnight. The doctor also expressed concerns about the safety of vaccines and the reliability of COVID tests. White took his case against the GMC to the High Court on the basis of his freedom of expression “to engage in medical, scientific and political debate and discussion,” White’s barrister, Francis Hoar, told a hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice. Hoar added that White’s opinions were “supported by large bodies of scientific and medical opinion” and had been “statements of fact and opinions about pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions in response to the pandemic.” GMC’s Alexis Hearnden claimed that White’s views were not only misinformation, but posed a “risk” to the public because they didn’t align with official pronouncements. However, the court ruled in favor of White, asserting that the tribunal which banned him from speaking had violated the 1998 Human Rights Act. The ruling concluded that the tribunal’s decision was “an error of law and a clear misdirection,” meaning the decision was “clearly wrong and cannot stand
  16. I never try and educate someone of a closed or narrow mind as you, it’s pointless. So enough said
  17. Thank you and for reconsidering your position on the matter
  18. No is not, read the article carefully his views are “extremely naive”. you are making it personal
×
×
  • Create New...