GLAB

Harry Cornick has been more effective and better value than Chris Martin?

I wasn’t positive largely due to his Forest and Pompey teams boring the shit out of everyone.

Tough game - take a point.

Manning/Eustace.

Where was Martin credited with this? Are you going by Pearsons statement of wanting to change the dressing room? Or was that Pearson wanting to find excuses for, what was at the time, a poor run of results? I get this forum is a Pearson love in, I don’t see it, he’s very clever with the messaging, but I’m far from convinced, and that is my viewpoint.

I’m not antagonising anyone? I’m giving my viewpoint.

We did have the budget/wage, unfortunately it seems that we have invested poorly with both Cornick and Mehmeti, obviously this could change with time.

I would’ve preferred to keep Chris Martin and spend the Semenyo money more wisely, that’s my opinion.

Didn’t Pearson say that we would only sign players who would make us better? In which case signing someone to see a game out isn’t an ideal use of funds. I think Pearson misjudged this signing, as he stated he is a ‘wide forward’ on multiple occasions, something he clearly isn’t based on performances for us.

I think ‘brilliant successes’ is over reaching a bit. I feel that window to replace semenyo wasn’t used wisely.

Positives: - He has a great deal of experience - He has developed youth players into first team regulars - Kept us competitive as the wage bill has been heavily reduced Negatives: - Hasn’t got the best out of some new signings, when money is tight it needs to be invested very wisely, Cornick+Mehmeti the obvious examples. - Can be spikey and confrontational - Home form been an ongoing issue. Just my thoughts!