IAmNick

Aaaaah no, Sam! Great pass from Cornick.

I keep getting banned from there for violating the terms of service but I'll try

These any better? First: https://streamable.com/ep7s2h Second: https://streamable.com/7qlauf

First was mid upload when the second went in!

City first (Knight): https://streamin.one/v/ede55a0c City second (James): https://streamin.one/v/d3127491

Looks like James might have pulled something a little in tha tackle?

Did this peak conincide with you being between maybe 10 - 30 or so by any chance? I suspect everyone elses peak would also coincide with those years in their life. Weird that eh!

Yeah fair point. I guess I was more thinking about the "If you're got nothing to hide why do you care" comments - I think that's a dangerous mentality to have. Rights are hard won, and easily given away! The dogs don't really bother me personally either, but I can understand where those who are bothered by them are coming from.

Both things can be true though right - we want to feel safe at events, but we should also be aware of what impact that has on our lives. I'm sure we'd all draw the line somewhere, his is just sooner than yours. I don't want to be frisked at every game, searched by dogs, have my photo taken, and so on "just in case" - I don't think that's right. I also think it's a bit of a poor argument overall as I don't get searched at home games - do you? Do you feel unsafe at them because people may have weapons in the ground as a result? I don't. Given the huge oversteps "authority" routinely makes in the name of keeping us safe, as well as the police's historic relation with football fans I'm certainly not "reassured" they're keeping us safe. I accept they have a hard job and I have no issue with the people doing it as individuals. I'm not convinced that the searches really have any positive effect to be honest, although I'd be happy to see the evidence otherwise. At a football match? Did he avoid a search somehow which otherwise would have caught him? Or is this point completely irrelevant?

We've won one of the last 7 I think, which goes back around 20 years

Don't think so and personally I don't reckon he's even trying!!!!!!

Yeah same dammit, hahahaha

G'wan Max

And again hahahaha ffs

I wish, I was celebrating thinking it had gone in!

WTF just happened?!

There are loads of Forest fans behind the goal who are clapping like mad when King's shot doesn't go in, and then head in hands 2 seconds later when Knight's shot does, great entertainment to watch them all tbh

Cool finish

Get in!

No, but I also don't think it's unreasonable to compare a performance by a team one place below us against one we very recently faced with ours is it, especially when ours was particularly poor.

Lovely goal

Been making some great posts lately @Silvio Dante, yet another set I agree with on this thread!

I voted neither for what it's worth. I'd probably do some kind of 4-1-3-2, maybe: Tanner/McCrorie - Vyner - Dickie - Pring James/Williams TGH - Knight - Twine/Sykes Conway - Wells

I don't doubt that, but I think the nature of the crosses was different - if we were winning the ball back high up the pitch, or at least playing reasonably directly (all the chipped balls down the wings remember...) and putting in a cross that's a different kettle of fish to a rather clever/considered/ponderous/boring (delete depending on your perspective) gradual working of a ball wide into a crossing position.

Yep, we seem to get into a decent position then just thump it blindly at top speed horizontally, often into the first man. If it does get through it's really hard to do anything with. I'd like to see us trying to pull more back to a Knight/TGH arriving later into the box personally.