leadman Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 for a contract. seen enough, give him 2 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmax Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 I'm not sure. He's inconsistent for me. He has played some pretty good games but others he's been a liability. SIgn him as a striker though! MM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdgifford64 Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Not for me. Wouldn`t be surprised to see him off back to Hungary. Thanks Tomas but no thanks. PDG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooter Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 I'm not sure. He's inconsistent for me. He has played some pretty good games but others he's been a liability. SIgn him as a striker though! MM That could well work actually! He's a bit unpredictable to say the least, (not quite as unpredictable as Bas Savage), but I reckon Vasko could do the business up front, providing we have a 20+ goals a season striker, up front with him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelbcfc Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 for a contract. seen enough, give him 2 years. I'm sure we have not seen the best of vasko. he was never given a proper run in the team,but he is still young and has plenty of promise. i too would give him a contract. and as he would now be our player if needed we could loan him out for match fitness and experience . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redtucks Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 I'm sure we have not seen the best of vasko. he was never given a proper run in the team,but he is still young and has plenty of promise. i too would give him a contract. and as he would now be our player if needed we could loan him out for match fitness and experience . Totally agree! Vasko has all the qualities required to be a top player for us. An intelligent footballer who can actually pass the ball rather than 'lump' it. Yes, he has made a few mistakes (and has been harshly treated for them IMO), but who hasn't? It took Basso a long time to come to terms with everything about the English game, and he made mistakes doing so. Sign Vasko, and give him a decent run in the side. I think he will prove to be a far better option than McCombe at this level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yate super reds Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 give him a contract and take a gamble on him as we had already agreed a fee of 150,000 for him so thats a pretty cheap gamble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MATTBCFC Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 give him a contract and take a gamble on him as we had already agreed a fee of 150,000 for him so thats a pretty cheap gamble If £150,000 is the fee it would change my mind in him and he would be worth a punt. I think he's been fairly good, and if he did get a longer run in the side i'm sure he would only improve. I thought the fee would be a lot higher to ne honest...£150,000 for an International seems awfully cheap...!? At that price definetely an asset, where did you see this figure banded about ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy g Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Unfortunately for him, he's looked like our fourth best centre half this season and if someone better becomes available, i can see him being shown the door. A shame, because he only got the odd game here and there and didnt really have much of a chance to settle in at the start of the season. He is also useful cover for McCombe if we need a big centre half who wins the ball in the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chappers Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 A defender has to be replaced at Wembley, so rather than using our substitute defender, we bring on a midfielder and put our midfield engine at right back. If we bring him on, it is as an emergency striker, so would it not be better to sign a defender that can be trusted, and a real striker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yate super reds Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 yes when they took him on loan city agreed the fee if they signed him after so he would be a bargin just needs time to settle at the club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wurzel_Bill Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 A defender has to be replaced at Wembley, so rather than using our substitute defender, we bring on a midfielder and put our midfield engine at right back. If we bring him on, it is as an emergency striker, so would it not be better to sign a defender that can be trusted, and a real striker? A good man to have on the bench. Can double as a defender or attacker, so acts as two subs. Sign him up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tin Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Not good enough for me, the cons outweight the pro's. He's too slow, doesn't dominate in the air as much as he should do for someone of his height, he's too dirty in the sense that he gives away too many fouls against mainly due to not adapting to the English game and I don't think he's learnt English making communication on the pitch with his teammates harder than it should be. He's also looked like a headless chicken for the most part of this season and had about 2 good games in his time here - Watford (h) and Burnley (a) spring to mind. The only positives are that he's got age on his side, he's available for next to nothing and he's an international. GJ's the best man to judge but I think we should look elsewhere unless he's shown something in training that suggests he'll become a collosus next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Who we sign will depend on who we keep and I rate Vasko as a footballing centre back who would shine in a three, not a flat back four and a two because, despite marking Henderson at Watford very well at AG, he isn't a first ball CB. Play him in a three with two marking defenders and let him bring the ball out of defence and you'll see a difference.He's the best passer of a long ball over 30 yards at the club (Not a clump, a proper long pass) and he can hit 50/60 yarders.He's also a danger in the opposition penalty area. If we're not doing that then let the lad move on and go out and get another Carey or Fontaine type player, a more traditional, man marking, defender.Mark Hudon who's just left Palace for Charlton is an example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pooki Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Thanks but no thanks , i think we need a player who is reliable and just used as a defender ... wasn't used at Wembley when we needed another defender and don't think we can be taking chances on players any more when they've already had a chance but not really proved themselves ..... Don't think he fits inot the way GJ likes to play long term Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tin Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Who we sign will depend on who we keep and I rate Vasko as a footballing centre back who would shine in a three, not a flat back four and a two because, despite marking Henderson at Watford very well at AG, he isn't a first ball CB. Play him in a three with two marking defenders and let him bring the ball out of defence and you'll see a difference.He's the best passer of a long ball over 30 yards at the club (Not a clump, a proper long pass) and he can hit 50/60 yarders.He's also a danger in the opposition penalty area. If we're not doing that then let the lad move on and go out and get another Carey or Fontaine type player, a more traditional, man marking, defender.Mark Hudon who's just left Palace for Charlton is an example. I guarantee you we won't be changing the shape of the whole side just to accomodate Vasko in a back three. For that reason, he isn't worth keeping as you say he doesn't work in a flat back four. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamikazee Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Don't forget too orr started in midfield and wasn't particularily great. after giving him a chance in the back 4 we now have a sturdy player that many would like to get their hands on. maybe tamas could be the same after another season. if he's that cheap let's take him. if we only put him out on loan for a 3 month so he plays every week and gets more used to our game over here and comes back a better player then it's worth it. if not bet he'll sell on to league 1 for 250k just from being part of the red squad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiggles Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 A defender has to be replaced at Wembley, so rather than using our substitute defender, we bring on a midfielder and put our midfield engine at right back. If we bring him on, it is as an emergency striker, so would it not be better to sign a defender that can be trusted, and a real striker? I think that had more to do with getting Johnson on the pitch, rather than a lack of confidence in the replacement defender. I was concerned we would miss Elliot's ball-winning in midfield, but to be fair we didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 He's a decent player but his lack of pace doesn't suit the English game and makes it hard for him to settle into a back four. I would edge towards no but if we do take him on I won't be disappointed. Perhaps sign him and loan him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTone Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 He's a decent player but his lack of pace doesn't suit the English game and makes it hard for him to settle into a back four. I would edge towards no but if we do take him on I won't be disappointed. Perhaps sign him and loan him. Well, hes gone now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leadman Posted May 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 still more deserving than keough or murrey id a thought. strange one realy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edson Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 still more deserving than keough or murrey id a thought. strange one realy. Keogh's only been offered a contract because he's under 24 and the club has to offer one if it wants compensation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhatWill Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Let's be honest, Vasko was only brought in because McCombe was injured pre-season. No great loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tin Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Let's be honest, Vasko was only brought in because McCombe was injured pre-season. No great loss. And Keogh's refusal to re-sign. I agree, he's no great loss at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MATT BCFC Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Seemed to have a poor positional sense and was prone to loosing concentration, which as a defender aint the best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.