Jump to content
IGNORED

Maynard Or


Baloonz

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this been discussed else where, haven't read every post of late.

If we had not signed (properly that is) Misfit or Motab would Maynard be here ?

Or was Maynard always on Lansdown and Johnson's radar ?

If he wasn't, then it looks like maybe the two failed signings may have worked in City's favour, we know that at the end of the season.

Its going to tough league this year, I keep getting all the latest news from workmates about Reading, Wolves, QPR, Crystal Palace, Watford, Swansea they all think they are up for it this year. :boxing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think its fair to say that if either

A) Meteb didnt play that game

B) Mifsud wasnt a greedy ****

we wouldnt have nicky. although we did enquire before he was obviously considered too expensive, and the afformentioned deals were def deemed better value by board before they went t*ts up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maynard was first choice but the fee was too high initially. GJ and SL obviously sat down and discussed that they could sign a more down to earth, more promising talent than Mifsud and Meteb and so went back to the table with an improved offer, at least that's how I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...