Guest Cyprus_Red Posted April 23, 2004 Report Share Posted April 23, 2004 according to mark mcghee somewhat agree how about you?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderJar Posted April 23, 2004 Report Share Posted April 23, 2004 No, I think we're crap............... of course I agree !!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glastonbury Red Posted April 23, 2004 Report Share Posted April 23, 2004 On a good day, without a doubt, but that's not every game Just need three more now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cyprus_Red Posted April 23, 2004 Report Share Posted April 23, 2004 Just need three more now agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green_genie Posted April 23, 2004 Report Share Posted April 23, 2004 nah, don't think so. QPR best footballing side. Argyle best side as proved by the table. Teamwork and workrate count for a lot at this level or else you boys who spend £4M a year on salaries wouldn't be struggling to go up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacs Posted April 23, 2004 Report Share Posted April 23, 2004 Depends on your definition of 'footballing' I think that City played far better football, certainly attacking wise, last season. This term, we have plugged the gaps in our defence but at the expense of our strike rate. As much as I like to see good football, City are at the stage in the season where I couldn't care less if they played it in the air for 90 minutes, as long as they WIN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderJar Posted April 23, 2004 Report Share Posted April 23, 2004 But that is based on your experience Genie. That is losing to them 3-0. They were playing well then. More recent experience is that they are playing badly. We beat you both 1-0 but of the two Argyle were by far the better side, occasionally posing a threat. QPR were dire and should have been beaten by more. If you don't beat them tomorrow I would be surprised. They may be okay at home but away they are very poor as a footballing side. The table tells the correct story, but only at the end of the season. By that time QPRs away form will have let them down badly and some inconsistency by ourselves will leave us second best only to you lot. The £4M wages that we pay will bear fruit as we consolidate in the First Division next season. I am sure of that. Because........ We are the City and we are the best We are the City so fuc£ all the rest Fuc£ them all Fuc£ them all The others are no good at all Cos we are the City and we are the best We are the City so fuc£ all the rest Fuc£ them all Fuc£ them all The others are no good at all (repeat for a very long time tomorrow) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keepers Ball Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Last year yes. This year too many long balls My opinion only of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westoncider Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 PLMOUTH too many long balls out from defence ,hoofballing side??? CITY very good footballing side,only problem being,it dosen't last for the full 90 mins usually just 45mins. COME ON CITY 90mins today of total football !!YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Today is a nice day ; lets make it very, very,very nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spud55 Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 We can be and we possibaly are, but like all of the top 3 from what i have read on their Mb's all of us have a tendency to play too much long ball when we are all good footballing sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.