bristolcitysweden Posted November 16, 2008 Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 Skuse went for the header and lost out, fair enough. From behind came Tyson already on the move and let alone by his marker Fontiane who prefered just to watch. No way Skuse could have beaten Tyson already on the move on pace. I rate Fontaine. Got the pace and the talent but frankly he is a chicken. Speaking about the first goal; that was Orr defending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingswood red Posted November 16, 2008 Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 Skuse went for the header and lost out, fair enough. From behind came Tyson already on the move and let alone by his marker Fontiane who prefered just to watch. No way Skuse could have beaten Tyson on already on the move. I rate Fontaine. Got the pace and the talent but he is a chicken. If Fontaines chicken what does that make Johnson or to a lesser extent McCindoe?, two bigger bottlers I've yet to see in a City shirt, pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted November 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 If Fontaines chicken what does that make Johnson or to a lesser extent McCindoe?, two bigger bottlers I've yet to see in a City shirt, pathetic. Dogs can be pitbulled so why not players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashcott Boy Posted November 16, 2008 Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 If Fontaines chicken what does that make Johnson or to a lesser extent McCindoe?, two bigger bottlers I've yet to see in a City shirt, pathetic. Have no idea which Johnson you're talking about because neither of them have bottled anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted November 16, 2008 Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 If Fontaines chicken what does that make Johnson? Chicken Little? Yesterday he was outstanding. It was only a matter of time before they came back out of the cellar wasn't it boys and girls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh_red Posted November 16, 2008 Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 Skuse went for the header and lost out, fair enough. From behind came Tyson already on the move and let alone by his marker Fontiane who prefered just to watch. No way Skuse could have beaten Tyson already on the move on pace. I rate Fontaine. Got the pace and the talent but frankly he is a chicken. Speaking about the first goal; that was Orr defending. to be honest, I found it harsh that Skuse has been hammered for the goal, he was well beaten for pace.....end of story, considering how quick Tyson is, I'm not surpised. after that goal however, Skuse did look decent and solid, alot of people forget Skuse's Debut however many years back. Centre Half and he was man of the match. as for the first goal.........Orr, Fontaine, McCombe, Wilson, Elliott.....all seen flying about all over the place and know-where near the ball, incompetence all round unfortunately for that unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted November 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 to be honest, I found it harsh that Skuse has been hammered for the goal, he was well beaten for pace.....end of story, considering how quick Tyson is, I'm not surpised. after that goal however, Skuse did look decent and solid, alot of people forget Skuse's Debut however many years back. Centre Half and he was man of the match. as for the first goal.........Orr, Fontaine, McCombe, Wilson, Elliott.....all seen flying about all over the place and know-where near the ball, incompetence all round unfortunately for that unfortunately. First goal was odd but Tyson could have been chopped down several times by Fontaine in the set up. I'm not having a go on Fontaine but on occasions the seems to be a bit absent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfc-andybuchs Posted November 16, 2008 Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 wether i blame him or not is irrevlevant. considering lc was suppose to be fit why wasnt he or wilson on the bench instead. or webster considering thats why we got him. defensive cover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest too hot to handle Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 I whole hartedly blame cole skuse for the goal. As soon as i saw he was coming on as a centre half i nearly went home. This is a guy who is useless as a centre midfield player so we're trying him in defence. Saying he looked comfortable after that is a rediculous statement, anything defensive he had to do he f##ked up. The only reason that we didnt concede more is because forrest weren't interested after that and decided to try and close the game out, which for me cost them 3 points as they could have scored 5 or 6 if they were interested imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redhyde Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 Don't blame Skuse for the goal, blame GJ for not picking a dedicated centre half on the bench. They always get hurt. Dumb not to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 Hmmm Does it make people feel better by passing blame? I'm guess it must feel real nice to point the finger from an armchair and sit smugly with your conclusion, but not sure it's ever helpful, required, necessary, infact it's pointless and just wrong. Well done to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redhyde Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 Hmmm Does it make people feel better by passing blame? I'm guess it must feel real nice to point the finger from an armchair and sit smugly with your conclusion, but not sure it's ever helpful, required, necessary, infact it's pointless and just wrong. Well done to you. Said from his armchair passing judgement. Er it's a football forum, we all make judgement calls about everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Man In Black Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 First goal: I think most of that end of the ground was waiting for Fonts to punt it into the stand. He didn't. Then of course we had several players seemingly tackle each other rather than the Forest player in the box. Who was to blame? Well, it was really a comedy of errors wasn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Red Cell Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 McIndoe was clearly to blame for both goals, any half decent left winger would have tracked back and cleared both Forest goals off the line. Useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 Said from his armchair passing judgement. Er it's a football forum, we all make judgement calls about everything. Umm Its a bit different, for one I'm not passing judgement on players, only voicing my opinion on posters because i'm sick and tired of people whining for the sake of it, but i take your point. and I'm not in an armchair unfortunately, i'm on a swivel chair with no arms rests to speak of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Peacock Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 Chicken Little? Yesterday he was outstanding. It was only a matter of time before they came back out of the cellar wasn't it boys and girls? Leave them Malone, it's not worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.