Barrs Court Red Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Any of its apologists want to justify the amount of times city are mentioned in an article about dangerous driving (I'm on my phone so can't post a link I'm afraid) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanC Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 I briefly read a artical in a chip shop the other day and there was something about a City fan being arrested for something and I just couldn't see the point in why he was pointed out as a City fan considering the offence I think had nothing to do with City or any games he attended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chivs Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Any of its apologists want to justify the amount of times city are mentioned in an article about dangerous driving (I'm on my phone so can't post a link I'm afraid) Please tell me you're not driving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanhamreds Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Please tell me you're not driving. nope, he's sat opposite me in work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edson Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Any of its apologists want to justify the amount of times city are mentioned in an article about dangerous driving (I'm on my phone so can't post a link I'm afraid) Was it written by convicted drink-driver Andy Stockhausen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted June 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Hold on, if your reading this, and I'm reading this, who's piloting the plane? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Mosquito Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Was it written by convicted drink-driver Andy Stockhausen? Nice one edson !!!!!!!! A football chant blast from the past........ Nice one edson Nice one son Nice one edson Let's have another one !!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bringbacktherobin Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Was it written by convicted drink-driver Andy Stockhausen? Now now, like he said, he was only "moving the car" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riaz Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Now now, like he said, he was only "moving the car" Whilst under the influence of Alcohol.... just thought I'd add that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edson Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Now now, like he said, he was only "moving the car" Yep. And the day they change the law to make it ok to drive a car whilst intoxicated, so long as you're only moving it a little bit, that will be an adequate defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riaz Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Yep. And the day they change the law to make it ok to drive a car whilst intoxicated, so long as you're only moving it a little bit, that will be an adequate defence. Just to clarify?! Andy Stockhausen was convicted of drink driving? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edson Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Just to clarify?! Andy Stockhausen was convicted of drink driving? Yes, that's right. He was found to be almost twice over the legal limit when breathalysed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsontour Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Ok, I will be an apologist....how in gods name did an article about a Bristol City COUNCIL van become a weary attack on a journalist who had nothing to do with either a) the article or b) the accident?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edson Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Ok, I will be an apologist....how in gods name did an article about a Bristol City COUNCIL van become a weary attack on a journalist who had nothing to do with either a) the article or b) the accident?? It's not an attack. Just stating some peripheral information that has nothing to do with the story. It's a tried and tested formula used by the Evening Post themselves. I think you're referring to the wrong story. The one mentioned in the opening post is about a steward at BCFC getting caught doing 125mph. http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/Match-...il/article.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted June 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Ok, I will be an apologist....how in gods name did an article about a Bristol City COUNCIL van become a weary attack on a journalist who had nothing to do with either a) the article or b) the accident?? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, which of course the old bill didn't with stockhausen...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Mosquito Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 I think you're referring to the wrong story. The one mentioned in the opening post is about a steward at BCFC getting caught doing 125mph. http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/Match-...il/article.html That nine-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, disqualified from driving for three years and ordered to carry out 120 hours of unpaid work seems rather harsh. Let's never forget the fact that PC Mark Milton - of the West Mercia Police - walked free from a corrupt West Mercia Court after doing 159mph. ......... Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/149...fice-rules.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Funny Schlockhausen has not appeared in the EP for weeks & weeks, has he been "let go"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swansea_Red Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 To be fair, as he isn't allowed to go out Friday, Saturday and Sunday evenings for 6 months will affect his ability to steward at the start of next season. But, to put it in the headline is a bit strange to say the least! They could have put anything there, his day job, that fact he won't be able to look after his mother properly, or even 'Man sentenced after 125mph police chase', perish the thought, but they chose they City angle. Coincidence.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 As this guy is reported to have two jobs, rather strange that they don't mention the other one at all, isn't it? I suppose "Aldi checkout worker convicted of drink driving", isn't going to further their agenda, I suppose...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted June 3, 2009 Admin Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 To be fair, as he isn't allowed to go out Friday, Saturday and Sunday evenings for 6 months will affect his ability to steward at the start of next season. But, to put it in the headline is a bit strange to say the least! They could have put anything there, his day job, that fact he won't be able to look after his mother properly, or even 'Man sentenced after 125mph police chase', perish the thought, but they chose they City angle. Coincidence.... Or even after a 120mph police chase if you read the article in full. But did anyone really expect the BEP to report the pure facts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.