Bar BS3 Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 It's been half mentioned in a couple of posts over the last few days. But tonight was the first time ive had it confirmed by reliable sources ( having not seen it myself) but the replay of Hartley's disallowed goal on Saturday, shows that he was ONside, and the goal should not have been cancelled out. Fine, that happens, life's a bitch and all that. HOWEVER, surely by **** face's, sorry, i mean Mr Warnock's rationel, his back 4 and GK, if not others are all unsporting cheats and should have rushed to the referee insisting that the linesman was incorrect in his judgement, and the goal should stand. I wasn't sure at the time, but surely they knew that Hartley was not in advance of the last defender when the initial shot came in? UNSPORTING CHEATS, thats what they are! Colin has made that quite clear!! *****!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Maesknoll Red Posted August 19, 2009 Admin Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 It's been half mentioned in a couple of posts over the last few days. But tonight was the first time ive had it confirmed by reliable sources ( having not seen it myself) but the replay of Hartley's disallowed goal on Saturday, shows that he was ONside, and the goal should not have been cancelled out. Fine, that happens, life's a bitch and all that. HOWEVER, surely by **** face's, sorry, i mean Mr Warnock's rationel, his back 4 and GK, if not others are all unsporting cheats and should have rushed to the referee insisting that the linesman was incorrect in his judgement, and the goal should stand. I wasn't sure at the time, but surely they knew that Hartley was not in advance of the last defender when the initial shot came in? UNSPORTING CHEATS, thats what they are! Colin has made that quite clear!! PRICK!! Been partaking of a small, after hours, restorative cordial, Rob? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riaz Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 It's been half mentioned in a couple of posts over the last few days. But tonight was the first time ive had it confirmed by reliable sources ( having not seen it myself) but the replay of Hartley's disallowed goal on Saturday, shows that he was ONside, and the goal should not have been cancelled out. Fine, that happens, life's a bitch and all that. HOWEVER, surely by **** face's, sorry, i mean Mr Warnock's rationel, his back 4 and GK, if not others are all unsporting cheats and should have rushed to the referee insisting that the linesman was incorrect in his judgement, and the goal should stand. I wasn't sure at the time, but surely they knew that Hartley was not in advance of the last defender when the initial shot came in? UNSPORTING CHEATS, thats what they are! Colin has made that quite clear!! *****!! yeah mate, it was onside ONSIDE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Man In Black Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 Yep, even the shadow says so in the pic. I understand why the linesman missed it, but I'm sure the defender - if taking the moral sporting high ground - would have ran to the ref to complain if he had realised he was playing him onside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.