megansdad Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/Town-green-supporters-spoken-stadium/article-2930173-detail/article.html?cacheBust=UCN9FVEEKXj2&success=true Today's article offers a real ray of hope in this saga, the fact that 13 of the 22 objectors who gave evidence to the Inspector had previously objected to the stadium without ever mentioning vIllage green status, while i am assuming from the quotes made that they did not either detail their extensive use of the land. If they did not in the original letters of objection then that must surely undermine their subsequent evidence to the Inspector................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Robin Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 http://www.thisisbri...j2&success=true Today's article offers a real ray of hope in this saga, the fact that 13 of the 22 objectors who gave evidence to the Inspector had previously objected to the stadium without ever mentioning vIllage green status, while i am assuming from the quotes made that they did not either detail their extensive use of the land. If they did not in the original letters of objection then that must surely undermine their subsequent evidence to the Inspector................. charades come to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CotswoldRed Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 I'm guessing that 13 of these objectors simply forgot to mention in their original letters that they use the land all the time. Just an oversight I would say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martyn Hocking Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 Also interesting that one of the 22 was only 12 years old - how can that person possibly contribute to a debate about what a piece of land has been used for over the last 20 years???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolman Block B Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 http://www.thisisbri...j2&success=true Today's article offers a real ray of hope in this saga, the fact that 13 of the 22 objectors who gave evidence to the Inspector had previously objected to the stadium without ever mentioning vIllage green status, while i am assuming from the quotes made that they did not either detail their extensive use of the land. If they did not in the original letters of objection then that must surely undermine their subsequent evidence to the Inspector................. Think that is more than a glimmer, more starting to shine if you ask me!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.