oldfield Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Article on Bristol Indymedia website has link to Applicants submission to new evidence. http://bit.ly/mNiB1A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screech Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Article on Bristol Indymedia website has link to Applicants submission to new evidence. http://bit.ly/mNiB1A What a completely biased piece of crap that is. It's screaming Tree Hugger love fest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldfield Posted June 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 If you have problems opening the document in the article, use the link below. http://bit.ly/iGlK6h Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funky monkey Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 What a completely biased piece of crap that is. It's screaming Tree Hugger love fest. Snap what a load Shite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milo1111 Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Jjust bitter nimby ramblings. Leaked docs? Cant see any reference to any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milo1111 Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Jjust bitter nimby ramblings. Leaked docs? Cant see any reference to any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldfield Posted June 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Jjust bitter nimby ramblings. Leaked docs? Cant see any reference to any. Document in question link http://bit.ly/iGlK6h This document is not available from Council. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Wow, after reading that document (scanning) their is some interesting reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Wow, after reading that document (scanning) their is some interesting reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screech Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Indymedia? Ha, It should be called a party political broadcast on behalf of the Green Party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Is it tahr interesing? 32 pages of rebuttal. I ******* hate these land grabbing peasants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stroudy Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 This is a tactic nothing more nothing less after the unfavourably report from the council towards the AV residents claims. I am not surprised as throughout most of this process there seems to have been dirty tactics from the AV'ers, such as SL stating he was under the impression the AV residents were ready to sign an agreement during mediation, then they simply didn't turn up. Last desperate stand IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abraham Romanovich Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Anyone interested should read the BEP and associated comments from Saturday 11th June. http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Locals-say-land-unsuitable-recreational-use/story-12753360-detail/story.html Compromise appears to be a non runner so I suppose this will get dragged through the Courts, any expert on here able to give a realistic time frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 I'd take anything on the BEP site with a pinch of salt and this document has been leaked from somewhere. Hope it's been digitally signed on download originally and the persons exposed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Orj Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Note a few of the events listed on the calendar of that website: Jun 15 The Mystery of Crop Circles Jun 21 Bristol talk: Architect to disprove official 9/11 account Nope, definitely not a bunch of lunatics. I'd imagine Teddy Wong, NTTDS and bristolcitysweden would all fit in rather well. Wibble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUMMAT OUTTA NOWT Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 The Whole Bristol Indymedia website conjours up a vision needed to be explained by two words. OH DEAR !!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slave to the rhythm Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 The Whole Bristol Indymedia website conjours up a vision needed to be explained by two words. OH DEAR !!!!!!!!!! Agreed, but that long document was clearly written by somebody who knows the law inside-out, and shows that this campaign isn't just being run by a handful of Ashton Vale residents. I think we are up against some seriously well-organised and knowledgable opponents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screech Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Agreed, but that long document was clearly written by somebody who knows the law inside-out, and shows that this campaign isn't just being run by a handful of Ashton Vale residents. I think we are up against some seriously well-organised and knowledgable opponents. Is that code for people with very little else going on in their lives, the curtain twitchers amongst us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slave to the rhythm Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Is that code for people with very little else going on in their lives, the curtain twitchers amongst us. No, it just strikes me that every "green/liberal" solicitor in the country (and there will be plenty of them) is involved in assisting the Ashton Vale residents who are opposed to the stadium. This has become a subject which extends far beyond Bristol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abraham Romanovich Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 No, it just strikes me that every "green/liberal" solicitor in the country (and there will be plenty of them) is involved in assisting the Ashton Vale residents who are opposed to the stadium. This has become a subject which extends far beyond Bristol. Unfortunately I think you are correct, this application is as you state being viewed as a" test case" by interested partys across the UK. As a result every decision reached will be appealed and will probably end up in the House of Lords before being passed to Brussels and the Court of Human rights. It could drag on for years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slave to the rhythm Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Unfortunately I think you are correct, this application is as you state being viewed as a" test case" by interested partys across the UK. As a result every decision reached will be appealed and will probably end up in the House of Lords before being passed to Brussels and the Court of Human rights. It could drag on for years Yes, that is my belief. Frankly, Bristol City Council are irrelevant in this process, as much higher powers than them will ultimately decide upon this issue. I think Yoda and the Jedi council ought to have the final say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abraham Romanovich Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 I think Yoda and the Jedi council ought to have the final say. Optimus Prime apparently moves among us,where is he in our darkest hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Or maybe they know they haven't got a cat in hells chance at an appeal and are trying every last ditch attempt at throwing a spanner in the works on the 16th? If they were so confident about going to an appeal and the like why would they resort to every underhand tactic they can use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGPHIL Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Surely this as you say is being viewed by many well beyond the boundaries that show the area goverened by BCC. If this goes against the landowners it leaves the floodgates open for the wholesale slaughter of would be developers. If the village green lobby win this one, everytime anyone wants to improve an area ny bringing jobs and investment to an area in will face the possibility of a leagle challange. It has already been said I believe that this law was never brought in to protect such a large area as 42 acres. Are there any village/town greens of such size? We will hopefully find out this week which way BCC recomend should be followed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screech Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Exactly, hardly a village green considering it 42 acres, more like National Park. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCAGFC Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Agreed, but that long document was clearly written by somebody who knows the law inside-out, and shows that this campaign isn't just being run by a handful of Ashton Vale residents. I think we are up against some seriously well-organised and knowledgable opponents. It is the Green Party & people who do not even live in Bristol. Oh & I forgot, that Sag solicitor. BCAGFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviestevieneville Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 If you have problems opening the document in the article, use the link below. http://bit.ly/iGlK6h It says on there now that the file has been deleted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
del ete Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 "Still Water" is a stirer wonder who he / she is. They seem very very confident on the result. Lets hope they need to change their name to Dead in the Water after the decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 It says on there now that the file has been deleted. Probably because I pointed out it could be digitally signed and traceable to the original owner of it. Bit late now pulling it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
del ete Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 Name & shame them mate Mr S Tillwaters perhaps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.