cidercity Posted July 14, 2011 Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 Surely that is the month up for the nimby's to apply for judicial review and the judge to look at it favourably, if they apply now the chance of the application being granted by the judge is very low. That is my understanding anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy082005 Posted July 14, 2011 Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 Thought they had 90 days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 14, 2011 Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 Its up to 90 days, from the time the council actually signed off the decision. For all we know that might have taken them 3 weeks to sort out after the original meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidercity Posted July 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 It is 90 days but after the first month if there is no application for review the judge looks at the applicant as just wanting to waste time, then the chances of him/her granting it are vastly reduced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tins Posted July 14, 2011 Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 Sorry what is going on here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Gow Posted July 14, 2011 Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 Is that a calander month up, or 4 weeks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Lewis Posted July 14, 2011 Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 Is that a calander month up, or 4 weeks? At a guess , with regard to previous posts, I would say it's 30 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmax Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 It is 90 days but after the first month if there is no application for review the judge looks at the applicant as just wanting to waste time, then the chances of him/her granting it are vastly reduced. This is exactly right. I would imagine the TVG people are talking with lawyers and also try to gather a case together and see if an appeal is possible. On the other hand they may not want to appeal but wait until the 90 day period is up to delay the building further! MM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melksham Red Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 This is exactly right. I would imagine the TVG people are talking with lawyers and also try to gather a case together and see if an appeal is possible. On the other hand they may not want to appeal but wait until the 90 day period is up to delay the building further! MM Your last paragraph sounds abor right. Im no expert but looking at all the facts I be amazed if they took this any further. They wanted. VG and now have one! Any appeal would show them for what they are. Anti stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmax Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 They wanted. VG and now have one! Any appeal would show them for what they are. Anti stadium. And from my understanding chatting to those in my area 'in the know' this is what they were working out on trying to avoid. They haven't come up with a plan to make it look anti stadium as they have said they don't oppose a stadium. The lady I spoke to recently said she has given up on it although she isn't one of the TVG people, just a helper/campaigner. MM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark43 Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Its up to 90 days, from the time the council actually signed off the decision. For all we know that might have taken them 3 weeks to sort out after the original meeting. I'd love to know the answer to this as it seems pretty crucial, does anyone know when it was actually signed off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrumpty Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 It was signed off at sunrise on midsomer's day, whilst the NIMBYS were merrily worshipping TVG, the god of swamps. They now have 3 lunar cycles in which to appeal. However, if one is a vegan, with a lesbian mother and a father that plays the banjo, the judge may allow another solar cycle to elapse. Ps. I don't really know the answer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebristolred Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 That was very good ^ . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melksham Red Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 And from my understanding chatting to those in my area 'in the know' this is what they were working out on trying to avoid. They haven't come up with a plan to make it look anti stadium as they have said they don't oppose a stadium. The lady I spoke to recently said she has given up on it although she isn't one of the TVG people, just a helper/campaigner. MM Sounds promising. The only way they could possibly continue is if they had eveidence that BCC or City have not played by the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.