screech Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14322957 Not sure how they can implement this, you stop them through one channel and a new one will open up within weeks. Totally pointless in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 It isn't possible to implement it in a way that can't be worked around. BT don't know what's going on once packets leave their network. And there's TOR: http://www.torproject.org/ They'll likely just block it on their DNS servers which means you can workaround trivially by using someone else's or by using a proxy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evocare Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 How much money and how many lawyers have these guys got between them? They can kick and scream all they like, if they want to pursue and prosecute individuals cases then fine, but trying to pass a law so they can shift blame onto BT, only so they can sue them later on is a poor show. No point passing a law that cant be enforced either, and who would enforce it? the tax player? It is not disputed that technical means of avoiding detection are available, for those knowledgeable and skilful enough to employ them. Nibor hits it with TOR 1) TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX (2) UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS (3) WARNER BROS. (4) PARAMOUNT PICTURES (5) DISNEY (6) COLUMBIA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.