Tim S Posted August 6, 2011 Report Share Posted August 6, 2011 A few people wondered what David James was appealing to the linesman for. Having just seen the goals, he is right - Chopra DID handle the ball when James kicked it against him. While it doesnt account for an all round poor performance, at least he might have been justified in his appeals for the third goal being handball. Having said that, the incident shouldnt have happened in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pezo Posted August 6, 2011 Report Share Posted August 6, 2011 A few people wondered what David James was appealing to the linesman for. Having just seen the goals, he is right - Chopra DID handle the ball when James kicked it against him. While it doesnt account for an all round poor performance, at least he might have been justified in his appeals for the third goal being handball. Having said that, the incident shouldnt have happened in the first place. It doesn't make any difference. Same as a most of last season we weren't over run and matched Ipswich in most areas but we made silly mistakes at the back which cost us the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notsobigfatdave Posted August 6, 2011 Report Share Posted August 6, 2011 A few people wondered what David James was appealing to the linesman for. Having just seen the goals, he is right - Chopra DID handle the ball when James kicked it against him. While it doesnt account for an all round poor performance, at least he might have been justified in his appeals for the third goal being handball. Having said that, the incident shouldnt have happened in the first place. In that case then hardly hand ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.