QuedgeRed Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 The decision by the board is without doubt going to be massive for the club. My personal thoughts are that if the club can afford to turn down offers of around 6 million for Maynard, then with a much more important decision for the club and it's future, they can't possibly contemplate any cheap options and must go all out, at no expense spared, to get the best possible candidate for the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswood Robin Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 I quite agree. Having good players is one thing but if you skimp on a manager, it's like having all the right parts but nothing to glue them together with. For me, the manager is the most important player and sufficient funds should be allocated accordingly. I hope they get it right this time, I can count on one hand how many (what I would regard) decent managers we've employed in the last 30 years, and we've employed a lot. A very poor record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete1975Legend Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 Very true this is vital and as OP says if we can turn down big fee for Maynard then we shouldn't be scraping the barrel for a decent boss. IF that means Jones in with new backroom staff we should be bending over backwards to make it happen. Not going for people like cotterill who have hardly set the world alight...........cheap cheap cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobby the red Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 After leaving Cheltenham he has done nothing he would be well down my list . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.