Lew-T Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 BRISTOL City owner Steve Lansdown is refusing to bow to the demands of "greedy" football agents. Lansdown may have stood down as Robins chairman last year, but he remains the club's majority shareholder and the man chiefly responsible for bankrolling new signings. Bristol City owner Steve Lansdown He met with manager Derek McInnes over the weekend to discuss player targets and has agreed to back City's boss as far as he can in the transfer market. Having saved City from relegation last season, the Scot is determined to strengthen his squad during the summer in an attempt to avoid another year of struggle. But multi-millionaire businessman Lansdown, who made his fortune from financial services, insists he will not be held to ransom by agents who try to take advantage of his wealth. Lansdown admits he and his fellow directors have, on occasions, been "weak" when negotiating player contracts in the past, but insists the straitened circumstances many clubs find themselves in dictate a more cautious approach in future. "Market forces will always dictate the terms of any deal, but I do feel we have to be stronger," said Lansdown. "We have been a bit weak in the past with some of the deals we have done and I think we have to stick by our principles. "If we offer a player a reasonably good wage, the chance to play football regularly and a good environment in which to do that, then it should be enough. "If they think they can get a few bob extra elsewhere, then we have to be prepared to let them go irrespective of what the agents say or do. "Agents can lose you a deal without a shadow of a doubt. They can be too greedy themselves or they can be too greedy for their players. "We cannot afford to go along that line and we have to stick to what we can afford. If a player wants to come to us, then great. If not, then no." City have made losses of close to £30 million in the past three years and it is clear the club is unable to compete financially with relatively cash-rich rivals who have recently been in the Premier League. But Lansdown has told McInnes he is sympathetic to requests for new players and is prepared to back his manager wherever he feels it is reasonable to do so. Lansdown, pictured, said: "My stance has always been that if the right player becomes available at the right price, then we will make the money available. "That will continue to be the case unless the directors decide to do differently. My view is that, if you make available a set amount of money, one of two things will happen. Either that money will be spent whether it should be spent or not, or you will not spend more than that because that is all you have to spend. "I don't think we should be put in that position. I think our recruitment policy should be to go and find the best players we possibly can and then see whether we can afford to move them in. If we can afford to move them in, then let's do that." With many clubs reducing the size of their squads in order to bring wages under control, Lansdown believes managers will now have the upper hand when negotiating with players. He said: "Football is in a parlous state and the game is full of clubs cutting their squads and reducing their overheads. We are no different. "But that also means there will be a greater supply of players who are available and capable of coming in and doing a good job for us. "A lot of work is going on and there are plenty of irons in the fire. "As always, it a matter of making sure you can get the contracts sorted out. "We would like to bring in three, four or five new players during the summer if we can." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numbeast Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 Great interview only shame about it is that the interview was by the clubs Tim Shires for the latest podcast. It would be good if the "Post" could provide the News to go with the title of newspaper rather than publish word for word parts of someone else's work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciderincornwall Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 How shocking are the Post! this is 4 days old! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Orns Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 We hear this every season, yet are still shocked to see how high up the list we are when the actual fees paid comes out! What worries me more is the amount of players SL says we would like to bring in - 3!? 5 would be the absolute minimum if all areas are covered, if it's 3 we may as well give up and go home! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strictly Obi Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 We hear this every season, yet are still shocked to see how high up the list we are when the actual fees paid comes out! What worries me more is the amount of players SL says we would like to bring in - 3!? 5 would be the absolute minimum if all areas are covered, if it's 3 we may as well give up and go home! I would rather bring in 3 quality players than 5 average ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 I would rather bring in 3 quality players than 5 average ones. But you know in your heart of hearts it will be 3 average ones, as the quality ones will have turned us down because we won't pay the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strictly Obi Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 But you know in your heart of hearts it will be 3 average ones, as the quality ones will have turned us down because we won't pay the money. Probably, but if Del has a set amount in the coffers to spare. Then you would expect that bringing in fewer players of a higher quality makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Humble Realist Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 Lip service from SL until we see where we end up in the table of fees that is published. I expect the agents he refers to who we have been 'generous' with are Stewart's, hunts, ciises and James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notsobigfatdave Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 that old Chestnut Steve... Monkeys & peanuts comes to mind... Just softening the blow for next season when no doubt this bloody folly of a stadium will sap all the available resources... See it coming a mile off.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.