formerly known as ivan Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Why oh why did you even bother signing Wilson on loan from luverpool if you are intent on playing the same ******* idiots that have failed time and time again? Same as most of your other signings that you don't even bother playing! Times up now **** off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsenalfan Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Like spence last season from west ham..... Craziness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keepers Ball Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 what gets me is the fact there is about £2.5 million sat on the bench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokey Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 My question to del would be "do the board pay high wages for forwards but really low wages for centre backs?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hartley's Beard Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Wait the same Wilson from Liverpool that hasn't been a regular this season? Del's fault he's not match fit.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Ashton Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 I reckon he's not playing Wilson as he doesn't want another loan defender getting injured! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted December 1, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Wait the same Wilson from Liverpool that hasn't been a regular this season? Del's fault he's not match fit.... Are you joking? He didnt have an issue playing Bates who hadn't even trained in about 3 seasons! Course Wilson would be fit why sign someone for a couple of months who will take that long to get fit? Hang on, this is del were talking about so not entirely impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokey Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 I reckon he's not playing Wilson as he doesn't want another loan defender getting injured! I reckon hes not playing wilson because hes not allowed to drop fontaine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hartley's Beard Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Are you joking? He didnt have an issue playing Bates who hadn't even trained in about 3 seasons! Course Wilson would be fit why sign someone for a couple of months who will take that long to get fit? Hang on, this is del were talking about so not entirely impossible. Wilson has less match fitness than Foster. Bates had less match fitness than who? We were kinda forced to pick him.... Wilson hasn't played all season apart from the few training games for us... Foster has played competitive matches all season. It make's no sense dropping someone who's fit and has an understanding with Albert. Wilson doesn't have that link and will need to play with Albert in training so they can get an understanding going, kinda hard to do that in just over a week.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Wilson has less match fitness than Foster. Bates had less match fitness than who? We were kinda forced to pick him.... Wilson hasn't played all season apart from the few training games for us... Foster has played competitive matches all season. It make's no sense dropping someone who's fit and has an understanding with Albert. Wilson doesn't have that link and will need to play with Albert in training so they can get an understanding going, kinda hard to do that in just over a week.... I can't believe the excuses people make, when Bates signed on the thursday DMC he is nowhere fitness and promptly plays him on the saturday, DMC is becoming like....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted December 1, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Wilson has less match fitness than Foster. Bates had less match fitness than who? We were kinda forced to pick him.... Wilson hasn't played all season apart from the few training games for us... Foster has played competitive matches all season. It make's no sense dropping someone who's fit and has an understanding with Albert. Wilson doesn't have that link and will need to play with Albert in training so they can get an understanding going, kinda hard to do that in just over a week.... Just to clear this up, I'm referring to Danny Wilson who we signed on loan from Liverpool, not marc Wilson. I wasn't on about the right back position, I was on about at centre back, the reason we signed Danny Wilson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Wilson has less match fitness than Foster. Bates had less match fitness than who? We were kinda forced to pick him.... Wilson hasn't played all season apart from the few training games for us... Foster has played competitive matches all season. It make's no sense dropping someone who's fit and has an understanding with Albert. Wilson doesn't have that link and will need to play with Albert in training so they can get an understanding going, kinda hard to do that in just over a week.... Why sign him then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Ashton Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Mr Beard, can you explain why Anderson and Morris don't play and the reason for signing them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hartley's Beard Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Just to clear this up, I'm referring to Danny Wilson who we signed on loan from Liverpool, not marc Wilson. I wasn't on about the right back position, I was on about at centre back, the reason we signed Danny Wilson Hold my hands up... my mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hartley's Beard Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Mr Beard, can you explain why Anderson and Morris don't play and the reason for signing them? Sure thing... Morris is signed so that he can transition into coaching, was brought along as he was a leader up north and is friends with Del. Anderson playing out wide was never going to play ahead of Adomah, and I have a sneaky feeling was panic bought in case Adomah did want to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Wait the same Wilson from Liverpool that hasn't been a regular this season? Del's fault he's not match fit.... it is Del's fault signing a unfit player for 1 month. Jesus man, are you his brother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Sure thing... Morris is signed so that he can transition into coaching, was brought along as he was a leader up north and is friends with Del. Anderson playing out wide was never going to play ahead of Adomah, and I have a sneaky feeling was panic bought in case Adomah did want to go. Umm, Morris seems to be doing a great job for Moral,, if he is there for leadership, seems he is doing well also. Anderson is a left sided, always played left side, so he was never going to replace Adomah. If we were intent on Selling Adomah, he would have ear marked a right winger to replace him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bemmyredjeff Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Sure thing... Morris is signed so that he can transition into coaching, was brought along as he was a leader up north and is friends with Del. Anderson playing out wide was never going to play ahead of Adomah, and I have a sneaky feeling was panic bought in case Adomah did want to go. Yes but the reality is that Adomah has been f**kin' useless for most of this season. Its a disgrace he hasn't started at least a couple of games, how are you ever going to judge a player. Just one of many strange McInnes decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hartley's Beard Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Umm, Morris seems to be doing a great job for Moral,, if he is there for leadership, seems he is doing well also. Anderson is a left sided, always played left side, so he was never going to replace Adomah. If we were intent on Selling Adomah, he would have ear marked a right winger to replace him. Because we have backroom unrest? A split dressing room? From what I've seen he's part of the dressing room and they all get along... Leadership? Well, difficult as he's not playing, but should he get picked again I'm sure he'll be showing the same passion and dedication as he has shown in the few games so far... By all means if I'm wrong on this I'm wrong... but Anderson 'wants' to play left side... BUT was used more on the right side for forest... If we can sign someone who's played championship on the right, who can also play on the left, then good times. It seemed to me at the time a fix to the problem of what if Adomah left. You disagree then by all means go ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
when i was a lad Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 I reckon hes not playing wilson because hes not allowed to drop fontaine i think your right something dodgy going on there !! How can someone keep playing so badly and keep getting in the side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouReds Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Wait the same Wilson from Liverpool that hasn't been a regular this season? Del's fault he's not match fit.... after that comment please never log in on this forum ever again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouReds Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Mr Beard, can you explain why Anderson and Morris don't play and the reason for signing them? exactly, morris anderson, baldock danny wilson, marc wilson, now even steve davies all players that del signed not even gettin a look hes clueless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouReds Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Sure thing... Morris is signed so that he can transition into coaching, was brought along as he was a leader up north and is friends with Del. Anderson playing out wide was never going to play ahead of Adomah, and I have a sneaky feeling was panic bought in case Adomah did want to go. well considering anderson has sated his best position is wide left ? hes not a right winger ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only way is up.... Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Because we have backroom unrest? A split dressing room? From what I've seen he's part of the dressing room and they all get along... Leadership? Well, difficult as he's not playing, but should he get picked again I'm sure he'll be showing the same passion and dedication as he has shown in the few games so far... By all means if I'm wrong on this I'm wrong... but Anderson 'wants' to play left side... BUT was used more on the right side for forest... If we can sign someone who's played championship on the right, who can also play on the left, then good times. It seemed to me at the time a fix to the problem of what if Adomah left. You disagree then by all means go ahead. God you talk some utter shite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hartley's Beard Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 God you talk some utter shite Thank's for the constructive comment... after that comment please never log in on this forum ever again ! Have a look again... Think you'll find I'm not blaming Del, just satirising some of the boo boys that were blaming him for all sorts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kibs Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 5 of McInnes' signings all on the bench yet we are still stuck with the likes of Fontaine, Kilkenny and Elliott. It beggars belief to be honest. I've rarely been critical of him but if I was Lansdown I'd be wondering why he has put together a very expensive subs bench when the 1st XI are performing so badly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.