Super Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 http://www.richest-people.co.uk/the-top-100/ Climbing the table now at number 90. Good news for us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Yeh, what's the problem ? :0) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid in the Riot Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 How come Steve's business partner Peter Hargreaves is worth £250m more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretSam Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 http://www.richest-p...uk/the-top-100/ Climbing the table now at number 90. Good news for us! Well, good news for him and his company's investors. How he chooses to spend it is his business, it's his money, and we've no rights to expect even a penny... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretSam Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 How come Steve's business partner Peter Hargreaves is worth £250m more? Probably because he's not p155ed millions on a crappy football team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskay Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Perhaps steve could sponsor us to the tune of £14m per season, would that get around FFP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JammyOne Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 http://www.richest-p...uk/the-top-100/ Climbing the table now at number 90. Good news for us! Good job Super. The latest news about the debt doesn't seem so bad now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Tansley Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 How come Steve's business partner Peter Hargreaves is worth £250m more? Steve doesn't own as much of HL anymore does he? I guess that's why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Well, good news for him and his company's investors. How he chooses to spend it is his business, it's his money, and we've no rights to expect even a penny... This is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted December 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Well, good news for him and his company's investors. How he chooses to spend it is his business, it's his money, and we've no rights to expect even a penny... I meant that the list shows he isn't struggling outside of football which is obviously good news for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 I meant that the list shows he isn't struggling outside of football which is obviously good news for us. This is also true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeRed Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 I meant that the list shows he isn't struggling outside of football which is obviously good news for us. Absolutely ! I mean without Lansdown we could well have been losing millions each season, been over 40 million in debt, had a crap squad struggling at the foot of the championship and have no new stadium. Great news indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRL Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 How come Steve's business partner Peter Hargreaves is worth £250m more? he doesn't piss his money away on a tinpot club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welcome To The Jungle Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 How come Steve's business partner Peter Hargreaves is worth £250m more? He owns more of the Buisness as SL sold some of his stake in it to fund AV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Albert Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 How come Steve's business partner Peter Hargreaves is worth £250m more? Yeah, Hargreaves owns something like 50% and after selling a stake in HL, Lansdown has something like 23% now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portland Bill Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 He could buy the Gas out, shut them down, and still have 749.5 million to spare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Where is the % of tax paid to HMRC column? They don't put that in do they? meaningless numbers in that bracket, I wonder if they all wake up evrry day and think WOOT! i'm ******* minted! *goes off to try out new leir jet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Thought Hargreaves owns 40% and Steve was down to 20% Etherway good for him and the 35 million he has lent us is just a drop in the ocean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfcbs20 Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Where is the % of tax paid to HMRC column? They don't put that in do they? meaningless numbers in that bracket, I wonder if they all wake up evrry day and think WOOT! i'm ******* minted! *goes off to try out new leir jet I would do this if I was Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC_Dan Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Perhaps steve could sponsor us to the tune of £14m per season, would that get around FFP? Not a daft suggestion as Man City are avoiding it by having a ridiculous sponsorship deal with Emirates. It is a viable loophole. However it's totally against the spirit of the thing and FPP or no FPP we should not be losing £14m a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 I would do this if I was Steve. Might hurt diving in, would have to replace gold coins with something equally expensive but softer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Probably because he's not p155ed millions on a crappy football team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Might hurt diving in, would have to replace gold coins with something equally expensive but softer Bristol Pounds, perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonL Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Just a 5% return of interest on steve's 750m would generate 37.5m per year!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryans Left Peg Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Not a daft suggestion as Man City are avoiding it by having a ridiculous sponsorship deal with Emirates. Is this a mistake or are both Man C & Arsenal sponsored by the Emirates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 How come Steve's business partner Peter Hargreaves is worth £250m more? Coz he does not have a stake in the BCFC money pit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC_Dan Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Is this a mistake or are both Man C & Arsenal sponsored by the Emirates? A mistake. It's Etihad, not Emirates who sponsor City I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDOXO Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Absolutely ! I mean without Lansdown we could well have been losing millions each season, been over 40 million in debt, had a crap squad struggling at the foot of the championship and have no new stadium. Great news indeed We are 40m in debt are we not? The debt is just to SL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeRed Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 We are 40m in debt are we not? The debt is just to SL woooosh ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorset_Cider Posted December 6, 2012 Report Share Posted December 6, 2012 Well......... if you're that rich then you've got to spend it somwhere? How much do most of us earn and spend.......? There must be a lesson there somewhere? Same BAT Time Same BAT CHANNEL Same BAT BCFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.