DancinDannyD Posted March 12, 2013 Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 Potential hoax but this has been posted on Rovers forums: if genuine another step closer.. just the JR window to close and s106 agreements to sign if true: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr P Westbury Planning Co-ordinator City Development Bristol City Council By email Peter.westbury@bristol.gov.uk Please ask for: Mike Walton Tel: 0303 444 8043 Email: mike.walton@communities.gsi.gov.uk Your ref: 12/02090/F Our ref: NPCU/CONS/20116/71653 Date: 12 March 2013 Dear Mr Westbury THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONSULTATION) (ENGLAND) DIRECTION 2009 Application No. 12/02090/F Redevelopment of the site comprising the demolition of the stadium and all related structures, and erection of a foodstore with under-croft parking, 65 residential units (houses and apartments) and community/commercial floorspace. Associated works comprising hard and soft landscaping, enlargement of vehicular access to Filton Avenue, and the creation on a mini-roundabout on Filton Avenue, and improvements to road junctions at Filton Avenue/Gloucester Road and Filton Avenue/Muller Road. I refer to your letter of 25 January 2013 referring to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government ("The Secretary of State") an application for planning permission for the above development. The Secretary of State has carefully considered this case against call-in policy, as set out in the Written Ministerial Statement by Nick Boles on 26 October 2012. The policy makes it clear that the power to call in a case will only be used very selectively. The Government is committed to give more power to councils and communities to make their own decisions on planning issues, and believes planning decisions should be made at the local level wherever possible.The Secretary of State has carefully considered the impact of the proposal, and the key policy issues which this case raises. In his opinion, the proposals do not: involve a conflict with national policies on important matters; have significant long term impact on economic growth and meeting housing needs across a wider area than a single local authority; have significant effects beyond their immediate locality; give rise to substantial cross boundary or national controversy; raise significant architectural and urban design issues; or involve the interests of national security or of foreign Governments. Nor does he consider that there is any other sufficient reason to call the application in for his own determination. He has therefore decided the application should be determined at local level, and has not called it in. In considering whether to exercise the discretion to call in this application, the Secretary of State has not considered the matter of whether this application is EIA Development for the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011. The local planning authority responsible for determining this application remains the relevant authority responsible for considering whether these Regulations apply to this proposed development and, if so, for ensuring that the requirements of the Regulations are complied with. The Article 25 Direction issued pursuant to the Secretary of State's letter of 22 February 2013 is hereby withdrawn. Yours sincerely Mike Walton Planning Casework Manager ------------------------------------------------------------------ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i hate you butler Posted March 12, 2013 Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 I know the Anthropology Department will be rubbing their hands at the chance to study that many missing links, but can you imagine how embarrassed most students will be to have those 'tards as near neighbours. I understand they've started Friends of Uwe Campaign to Kick Out Football Failures.they could have shortened it a bit better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gormagubrath Posted March 12, 2013 Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 I know the Anthropology Department will be rubbing their hands at the chance to study that many missing links, but can you imagine how embarrassed most students will be to have those 'tards as near neighbours. I understand they've started Friends of Uwe Campaign to Kick Out Football Failures. Seriously? You think somewhere like UWE would have an Anthropology Dept? It's all applied media studies, nursing and drama studies there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.