Wardie Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 scott brown move good to see him find a club straight away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider red Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 What i want to know is if he's thought highly of by stowell why the hell have we let him go?? From what i saw of him he looked a really good young goalkeeper and its not like we've got loads of back up for phillips is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest philip Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 thats exactly waht i was thinking, saw him play in the reserves at rovers and looked brilliant must be good as he has got a club quicker than any of the ohter 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 He shouldn't have been released, and should have been promoted to number 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riaz Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 The reason could be that Phillips will be no 1 for quite some time (maybe even 10 years) and also we cannot afford a luxury of 2 back-up keepers (Including stowell) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfc seattle Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 I gotta think if we "thought highly of him" and he was picked up lightning fast. That we must have a new keeper signed or agreeing to sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest philip Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 what you mean ahead of philips? You cant drop philips Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wesco Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 You can think highly of someone but not think they are good enough for you surely. Can't you? He could be a good up and coming player who needs regular football which City can't give to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cider head Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 The reason could be that Phillips will be no 1 for quite some time (maybe even 10 years) and also we cannot afford a luxury of 2 back-up keepers (Including stowell) could be right there, but the club still can't gamble on the fact phillips won't get injured in 10 years stowell won't be around forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wolverhampton cider ed Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 Scott browns me mate and lets just say that the reason for Wilson not keeping him was pathetic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stevey2005 Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 what was the reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfc seattle Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 got me curious as well, what would he not mow DW's lawn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wolverhampton cider ed Posted June 3, 2004 Report Share Posted June 3, 2004 couldnt say Let u all know if he wants me to say dont want to get him in trouble were supposed to be looking at steve harper fromnewcastle though if we went up dont no if we stil are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.