Davros Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 If you think we are going to be able to turn over the number of players in the squad that we would like in a few months in the summer. Some of the players out of contract we want to keep and most of the ones that are in contract we don't want to keep and nobody else wants. So I say if you think the squad will have more than 30% turn over your smoking crack IMHO. Plus I have not had this confirmed by anyone but I don't think I have heard any speak of significant relegation clauses in players contracts. So if that's the case and we were paying over the odds ala Peterborough 2.5K a week vs City 10K a week they are going to be hard to shift as well just like the last time good players will be cherry picked leaving us with the over paid shitters!. Sorry just wanted to inject some reality into the were going to get rid of all the wasters come the summer debate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 17 players on contract 12 players out of contract We can't afford Albert and the rest are shit. Do nothing and 41 percent are out.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 The club has a wage clause in players contracts as to what division we are in. Not for all I would venture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fka dagest Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 The forum hasn't seen a squabble over the correct use of English grammar for a while (unless I missed it). What do people think about 'Your all smoking crack'? It's going to be a long summer, so we may as well vary the arguing. Personally I've never smoked crack. I much prefer a small sherry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Brakspear Oxford Gold for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros Posted May 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 The forum hasn't seen a squabble over the correct use of English grammar for a while (unless I missed it). What do people think about 'Your all smoking crack'? It's going to be a long summer, so we may as well vary the arguing. Personally I've never smoked crack. I much prefer a small sherry. Do you know how fast I typed that, young man! You're a pedant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros Posted May 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 17 players on contract 12 players out of contract We can't afford Albert and the rest are shit. Do nothing and 41 percent are out.. That's my point most of the ones you would like to keep are out of contract, do nothing and your left with the shit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Apart from Albert, who we can not afford, we do not wish to keep anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fka dagest Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Do you know how fast I typed that, young man! You're a pedant! I'm more mischievous than pedantic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelRobartes Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 That's my point most of the ones you would like to keep are out of contract, do nothing and your left with the shit! To be fair, Cunningham, Moloney and Anderson will all still be under contract. They'd be three of the first names on my (very short) 'keep' list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i hate rovers Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 If you think we are going to be able to turn over the number of players in the squad that we would like in a few months in the summer. Some of the players out of contract we want to keep and most of the ones that are in contract we don't want to keep and nobody else wants. So I say if you think the squad will have more than 30% turn over your smoking crack IMHO. Plus I have not had this confirmed by anyone but I don't think I have heard any speak of significant relegation clauses in players contracts. So if that's the case and we were paying over the odds ala Peterborough 2.5K a week vs City 10K a week they are going to be hard to shift as well just like the last time good players will be cherry picked leaving us with the over paid shitters!. Sorry just wanted to inject some reality into the were going to get rid of all the wasters come the summer debate yes youre right where on it ...you lick it If you think we are going to be able to turn over the number of players in the squad that we would like in a few months in the summer. Some of the players out of contract we want to keep and most of the ones that are in contract we don't want to keep and nobody else wants. So I say if you think the squad will have more than 30% turn over your smoking crack IMHO. Plus I have not had this confirmed by anyone but I don't think I have heard any speak of significant relegation clauses in players contracts. So if that's the case and we were paying over the odds ala Peterborough 2.5K a week vs City 10K a week they are going to be hard to shift as well just like the last time good players will be cherry picked leaving us with the over paid shitters!. Sorry just wanted to inject some reality into the were going to get rid of all the wasters come the summer debate i think i must be! ive been watching this shite since the 80s it helps.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBW Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 You're* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Team In Keynsham Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Apart from Albert, who we can not afford, we do not wish to keep anyone. Who is the "we" you are referring to? The second one, to be precise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Who is the "we" you are referring to? The second one, to be precise. Fans who do not which to wastly overpay total shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorset_Cider Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Do you know how fast I typed that, young man! You're a pedant! Is that someone who's attracted to young ants? Okay I know....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Don't worry. Like in North Korea nothing will change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Horse With No Name Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 To be fair, Cunningham, Moloney and Anderson will all still be under contract. They'd be three of the first names on my (very short) 'keep' list. what on earth do people see in Anderson? For me he is totally anonymous in most games . Still, its all about opinions I suppose . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldlandReddies Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Yeah, with a bottle of Stella watching the footie. Sweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelRobartes Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 what on earth do people see in Anderson? For me he is totally anonymous in most games . Still, its all about opinions I suppose . I'm quite taken aback by that. It's so far from what I see that it's unreal. In fairness he hasn't been so great recently but it's not like anyone else has been. I thought most of his performances until then made a mockery of McInnes' constant refusal to play him. As you say, it's all about opinions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Team In Keynsham Posted May 2, 2013 Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Fans who do not which to wastly overpay total shit. Presumably you have a list of who they are and confirmation that you are their spokesman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Butterfield Posted May 3, 2013 Report Share Posted May 3, 2013 Must...not.....correct..... Grammar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros Posted May 3, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2013 Must...not.....correct..... Grammar Too late its been done, if you were the real police we would all be screwed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semblar Posted May 3, 2013 Report Share Posted May 3, 2013 If you think we are going to be able to turn over the number of players in the squad that we would like in a few months in the summer. Some of the players out of contract we want to keep and most of the ones that are in contract we don't want to keep and nobody else wants. So I say if you think the squad will have more than 30% turn over your smoking crack IMHO. Plus I have not had this confirmed by anyone but I don't think I have heard any speak of significant relegation clauses in players contracts. So if that's the case and we were paying over the odds ala Peterborough 2.5K a week vs City 10K a week they are going to be hard to shift as well just like the last time good players will be cherry picked leaving us with the over paid shitters!. Sorry just wanted to inject some reality into the were going to get rid of all the wasters come the summer debate "The vast majority of players would have all taken a 50% drop in their wages through the relegation clauses in their contracts. Therefore we'll shrink our wage bill by 50%," O'Driscoll explained. Taken from http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22313358 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calculus Posted May 3, 2013 Report Share Posted May 3, 2013 Must...not.....correct..... Grammar Quite right - he's Walshy's son in law you know.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threshersleftboot Posted May 3, 2013 Report Share Posted May 3, 2013 Before we worry about the players we should start by getting rid of our p----k of a manager,he doesent inspire me and it looks a bleak road ahead with him at the helm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted May 3, 2013 Report Share Posted May 3, 2013 Before we worry about the players we should start by getting rid of our p----k of a manager,he doesent inspire me and it looks a bleak road ahead with him at the helm. yes because we need a 6th manager in 3 years don't we for a change why don't we actually give a manager a chance to re-build a squad instead of just papering over the cracks all the time, You know what happened with the last manager we gave a bit of time too a promotion, a play-off final and a top 10 finish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i hate rovers Posted May 3, 2013 Report Share Posted May 3, 2013 You're* city through and through since 1979 sorry not 1980s youre?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garland-sweden Posted May 3, 2013 Report Share Posted May 3, 2013 Lets hope for the best. Maybe some foreign players will do good in City. Look at the polish player in Dortmund, 4 goals vs Real and he was cheap. Scouting is very important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.