Mr Mosquito Posted April 14, 2014 Report Share Posted April 14, 2014 In September 2013, Andy Rhodes, Assistant Chief Constable of Lancashire Constabulary, told delegates at a child sexual exploitation conference in Lancashire: "The reason Cyril Smith, Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall got away with what they got away with, which was serious prolonged sexual exploitation of young people, was because leaders who had responsibility to do something, did not do it. They turned a blind eye. Buried their heads in the sand." .......In September 2013, a Channel 4 Dispatches programme "The Paedophile MP: How Cyril Smith Got Away With It" quoted the Crown Prosecution Service as claiming that they had not prosecuted Smith for crimes of abuse because he had been given an assurance in 1970 that he would not be prosecuted, and that prevented them from subsequently reopening the investigation under the law at the time. Political journalist Francis Wheen said that he found this explanation incomprehensible. The programme alleged that a prosecution was probably blocked in the 1970s by the Labour government as it relied on Liberal Party support. Source: wikipedia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddy31 Posted April 14, 2014 Report Share Posted April 14, 2014 Edited out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted April 15, 2014 Report Share Posted April 15, 2014 In September 2013, Andy Rhodes, Assistant Chief Constable of Lancashire Constabulary, told delegates at a child sexual exploitation conference in Lancashire: "The reason Cyril Smith, Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall got away with what they got away with, which was serious prolonged sexual exploitation of young people, was because leaders who had responsibility to do something, did not do it. They turned a blind eye. Buried their heads in the sand." .......In September 2013, a Channel 4 Dispatches programme "The Paedophile MP: How Cyril Smith Got Away With It" quoted the Crown Prosecution Service as claiming that they had not prosecuted Smith for crimes of abuse because he had been given an assurance in 1970 that he would not be prosecuted, and that prevented them from subsequently reopening the investigation under the law at the time. Political journalist Francis Wheen said that he found this explanation incomprehensible. The programme alleged that a prosecution was probably blocked in the 1970s by the Labour government as it relied on Liberal Party support. Source: wikipedia Absolutely and David Steele put the fat piece of shit up for a knighthood, knowing full well about his activities and apparently Nick Clegg says he has been totally unaware of the scandal until recently and even now the Lib Dems have not been very helpful with the enquiry so far, absolute disgrace it's about time the ******* Liberals came clean over this one. Mind you let us not forget several now prominent Labour MP's giving paedo's creedence by giving them a platform during this sad time in our political history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Hitler Posted April 15, 2014 Report Share Posted April 15, 2014 It isn't the first time dirty politics has protected people, Bob Boothby and Tom Driberg were both protected in the 60s as their parties feared the damage their exposure would cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cambridge Batch Red Posted April 15, 2014 Report Share Posted April 15, 2014 Westminster is full of perverts. Doesn't matter which party they are either. The place is infested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.