Hydey Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Anyone just see his goal for Rangers? We should of signed him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carey 6 Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 They've swapped Foster for Tavernier. That is great business. Pretty gutted we didn't get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mendip City Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Yeah. Strange that we didn't appear to go for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 We've no idea if we made him an offer or not. Maybe he simply had no interest in joining us permenantly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITYAREREDANDWHITE Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Got him and waghorn for a 400k joint price Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Got him and wag horn for a 400k joint price Excellent deal, Tavs alone should be 400k! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mendip City Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Excellent deal, Tavs alone should be 400k! I was about to say that!! Haha. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carey 6 Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 He was ok for us. Started off poorly imo and seemed ill at ease as a wing back, getting caught out of position regularly, but got better as time went on. He would have been ok as a squad member - but not at 400k. As soon as he got a run & gained match practice he was very good, if I had the choice of him or Little I'd pick Tavs every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 He was ok for us. Started off poorly imo and seemed ill at ease as a wing back, getting caught out of position regularly, but got better as time went on. He would have been ok as a squad member - but not at 400k. Hmm, no - hard to judge from a loan but in my opinion he'd be an upgrade on Little with more to his game. Would be a good price for 400k and would improve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Well, Rangers didn't pay 400k for him, so why would it be a good price ? He'd be sat on the bench if Little was fit, no doubt about that - just as he was when he was here. It was in relation to what you said about 400k which was what Rangers paid for him AND Waghorn. I think he'd end up playing more than Little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 400k would be at least 150k too much. And I maintain that he'd get splinters in his arse here - which may explain why he's not. Agree to differ. No way, not many better right wing backs at this level than him; and he can take an excellent free kick/corner which would add to his value. You're right, agree to disagree on this one but I'm sure he'd play more than little if he was here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 I don't quite get what people saw in him. Far from gutted we didn't sign him perm, even with the small squad we currently have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 I've heard he was allergic to Cotterill's hairgel and would have signed but Cotts would n't change his brand . It's as true as i'm an international lama show jumping champion . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londoner Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 He was very good bar his first few weeks which is understandable considering he was rusty. Can't see a full season out of little, whether due to injury or just fitness, doesn't strike me as the fittest player. Disappointed we didn't o for him, could see him getting 5+ goals from RWB which would be outstanding. Surprised and disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coxy27 Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Martyn Waghorn is only 25, I'm surprised. 400K for the both of them would have been a decent deal for us, but for whatever reason they haven't come here, they've gone somewhere else, so we move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 They've swapped Foster for Tavernier. That is great business. Pretty gutted we didn't get him. Why would you want Foster ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhistleHappy Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 * Once upon a time we had Tavernier To whom we raised a glass of Natch or two Today we simply pass away the hours Remembering the great things he could do *Those were the days my friend We thought they'd never end Those were the days Oh yes those were the days La la la la la, la la la la la laaaa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireSection Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 He was ok for us. Started off poorly imo and seemed ill at ease as a wing back, getting caught out of position regularly, but got better as time went on. He would have been ok as a squad member - but not at 400k. A lot better than our other fit option at the moment though. Tavernier was great once he bedded in, he looked like he really could have done a job for us, oh well NEXT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireSection Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted July 26, 2015 Report Share Posted July 26, 2015 I watched the game, Tavernier scored a great goal and endeared himself to the Rangers fans by getting stuck in, going forward he was ok, defensively not so good. The overall standard of this game was appalling and on that showing I didn't witness one player that I would gladly see at AG from either team. PS:- Foderingham is still a total liability with the ball at his feet, you'll be glad to hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted July 26, 2015 Report Share Posted July 26, 2015 Agree that Tavernier got better as he got more game time, by the fund id have said he was better than little, who I think will get found out in the championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aa_bcfc Posted July 26, 2015 Report Share Posted July 26, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted July 26, 2015 Report Share Posted July 26, 2015 I didn't think Tavernier showed much of anything whilst here and he's moved to a pub league which is unambitious. I think people wanting us to have signed him might be feeling a little more desperate than they ought to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted July 26, 2015 Report Share Posted July 26, 2015 I didn't think Tavernier showed much of anything whilst here and he's moved to a pub league which is unambitious. I think people wanting us to have signed him might be feeling a little more desperate than they ought to. Did you go to Chesterfield, Preston and Bradford? All really good performances from him. Just seemed to get better with every game - especially away from home. Have to say that after his first few games, I really thought he was poor but I was wrong about him. 3 goals in 9 games wasn't bad either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.