Lack of Action Man Posted January 14, 2016 Report Share Posted January 14, 2016 I would imagine that he will be staying for the long term as he is the link beyween the board and coaching staff. With that in mind, it means that whoever we decide to bring in as next manager has to be able to work under the DOF model of operations otherwise we could find ourselves in an even worse situation. Could it be possible that Burt would leave/be pushed also with the arrival of a new manager and backroom staff? Unlikely, but anything could happen this season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted January 14, 2016 Report Share Posted January 14, 2016 I suppose it all depends on how much he is perceived to be culpable for the various transfer fiascos. If identifying targets is his role, I'm skeptical that he can completely absolved of blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 14, 2016 Report Share Posted January 14, 2016 Given that there seemingly has been some serious breakdown in communication between the board and the coaching staff then I'd suggest he should fall by the way too. More so, I hope before deciding whether to sack SC they thought about KB's post first and whether it may be better to replace him instead or as well as SC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sydneybcfc Posted January 14, 2016 Report Share Posted January 14, 2016 I got the impression the when SC came in the whole DoF and Head Coach system we were trying to set up (and emulate the likes of Swansea) went out the window. SC came in as an old school manager who wanted to do everything including player transfer selection. Burt seemed to get relegated to just a negotiator and chief scout. As much as he gets bagged out, he agreed prices for all these transfers that fell through and I assume offered fair wage deals within our price structure so blaming the deals falling though on him is a little harsh. Now, if it was in fact him and not SC calling the transfer shots then he does have an element of blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CotswoldRed Posted January 14, 2016 Report Share Posted January 14, 2016 Depends how big a manager they want. The bigger the manager, the more it will be up to the manager how recruitment works. This is why I think we'll opt for the cheaper option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Septic Peg Posted January 15, 2016 Report Share Posted January 15, 2016 We obviously have issues in tempting players to come here. We are strict in the player wage structure. Does FFP regs apply to manager wage too? Because I feel we now need a big and talented name to persuade players to take a cut and play under him. Like Moyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.